032 Cognitive deficits are associated with anosmia but not anxio-depressive symptoms in COVID-19

L. Cysique, Y. Allen-Davidian, David R Darley, A. Byrne, Kay Wilhelm, G. Dore, Gail V. Matthews, Bruce J. Brew
{"title":"032 Cognitive deficits are associated with anosmia but not anxio-depressive symptoms in COVID-19","authors":"L. Cysique, Y. Allen-Davidian, David R Darley, A. Byrne, Kay Wilhelm, G. Dore, Gail V. Matthews, Bruce J. Brew","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2021-anzan.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To characterise cognitive performance and olfaction in recovered COVID-19 patients. Methods Patients underwent cognitive, olfaction and mental health assessments 2 months after initial SARS-CoV-2 infection as part of the Sydney St. Vincent’s Hospital ADAPT study, a prospective cohort study. Cognition was assessed with the Cogstate computerised battery and expressed as a demographically-corrected composite z-score and clinically classified as impaired/borderline/unimpaired. Anxio-depressive symptoms were assessed with the Depression in the Medical ill scale-10 (DMI-10), the Somatic and Psychological HEalth Report-34 (SPHERE) Psych sub-scale, and the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IESR) and reduced into single Principal Component explaining 80% of the variance. Olfaction was assessed with the NIH Toolbox Odor Identification test and expressed as demographically-corrected T-scores, and impaired/unimpaired. Disease severity was classified as mild (40%), moderate (50%) or hospitalised (10%). Results 132 patients (mean age=46±15; 40% women, median education=16 years, 10% Non-English-Speaking Background-NESB) were included. 17% had impaired cognition, 10% had borderline deficits, 25% has impaired olfaction. 25% had clinically elevated symptoms on the DMI-10, 13% on the IESR, and 35% on the SPHERE. Regression analyses showed that anxio-depression was not associated with cognitive performance (unadjusted p=.43; adjusted for sex & NESB p=.98) nor impaired/unimpaired status (unadjusted p=.50; adjusted for sex & NESB p=.78). Cognitively impaired patients were more likely to have impaired olfaction (p Conclusions Cognitive impairment is common and not related to psychological factors, may occur independent of disease severity and is associated with anosmia. These point to direct brain effects of COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":19692,"journal":{"name":"Oral abstracts","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2021-anzan.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To characterise cognitive performance and olfaction in recovered COVID-19 patients. Methods Patients underwent cognitive, olfaction and mental health assessments 2 months after initial SARS-CoV-2 infection as part of the Sydney St. Vincent’s Hospital ADAPT study, a prospective cohort study. Cognition was assessed with the Cogstate computerised battery and expressed as a demographically-corrected composite z-score and clinically classified as impaired/borderline/unimpaired. Anxio-depressive symptoms were assessed with the Depression in the Medical ill scale-10 (DMI-10), the Somatic and Psychological HEalth Report-34 (SPHERE) Psych sub-scale, and the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IESR) and reduced into single Principal Component explaining 80% of the variance. Olfaction was assessed with the NIH Toolbox Odor Identification test and expressed as demographically-corrected T-scores, and impaired/unimpaired. Disease severity was classified as mild (40%), moderate (50%) or hospitalised (10%). Results 132 patients (mean age=46±15; 40% women, median education=16 years, 10% Non-English-Speaking Background-NESB) were included. 17% had impaired cognition, 10% had borderline deficits, 25% has impaired olfaction. 25% had clinically elevated symptoms on the DMI-10, 13% on the IESR, and 35% on the SPHERE. Regression analyses showed that anxio-depression was not associated with cognitive performance (unadjusted p=.43; adjusted for sex & NESB p=.98) nor impaired/unimpaired status (unadjusted p=.50; adjusted for sex & NESB p=.78). Cognitively impaired patients were more likely to have impaired olfaction (p Conclusions Cognitive impairment is common and not related to psychological factors, may occur independent of disease severity and is associated with anosmia. These point to direct brain effects of COVID-19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
032在COVID-19中,认知缺陷与嗅觉缺失有关,但与焦虑抑郁症状无关
目的了解COVID-19康复患者的认知功能和嗅觉特征。方法:作为悉尼圣文森特医院ADAPT前瞻性队列研究的一部分,患者在首次感染SARS-CoV-2 2个月后接受认知、嗅觉和心理健康评估。认知用Cogstate计算机化电池进行评估,并以人口统计学校正的复合z分数表示,并在临床上分为受损/边缘/未受损。焦虑抑郁症状的评估采用医学疾病抑郁量表-10 (DMI-10)、躯体和心理健康报告-34 (SPHERE)心理子量表和事件影响量表-修订(IESR),并简化为单一主成分,解释80%的方差。嗅觉用NIH工具箱气味识别测试进行评估,并以人口统计学校正的t分数和受损/未受损表示。疾病严重程度分为轻度(40%)、中度(50%)或住院(10%)。结果132例患者(平均年龄46±15岁;40%为女性,中位受教育程度为16年,10%为非英语背景(nesb)。17%的人有认知障碍,10%有边缘性缺陷,25%有嗅觉障碍。25%的患者在DMI-10上有临床症状升高,13%在IESR上有临床症状升高,35%在SPHERE上有临床症状升高。回归分析显示,焦虑抑郁与认知表现无关(未经调整p= 0.43;调整性别和NESB p= 0.98),也没有受损/未受损状态(未调整p= 0.50;调整性别和NESB p=.78)。结论认知障碍是常见的,与心理因素无关,可能独立于疾病严重程度而发生,并与嗅觉缺失有关。这些都指向了COVID-19对大脑的直接影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BOS4b.003 A definitional framework of advance care planning in dementia achieved a consensus in a 33-country delphi study BOS3c.001 Evaluating the impact of a virtual training programme for advance care planning facilitation in nursing homes in Singapore BOS3b.003 Utilizing simulated learning to develop non-clinical skills: a unique approach to improving advance care planning processes BOS4b.002 Advance care planning with a conversation game: a feasibility and acceptability study BOS5b.003 Attitudinal factors involved in advance directive adoption over a four-year period: evidence from a population-based study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1