Stress-induced ST-segment elevation following myocardial infarction and its role in wall motion abnormality, myocardial ischemia and viability: comparison of response to exercise, dobutamine and dipyridamole.

T. Yamamoto, T. Miyazaki, Y. Hirano, K. Ishikawa
{"title":"Stress-induced ST-segment elevation following myocardial infarction and its role in wall motion abnormality, myocardial ischemia and viability: comparison of response to exercise, dobutamine and dipyridamole.","authors":"T. Yamamoto, T. Miyazaki, Y. Hirano, K. Ishikawa","doi":"10.1253/JCJ.65.1029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stress-induced ST-segment elevation following myocardial infarction (MI) has been correlated with myocardial ischemia, viability and wall motion abnormality, but its mechanism is still unclear, so the present study compared ST-segment elevation and wall motion response during exercise, dobutamine and dipyridamole stresses. Twenty-five patients with their first anterior MI underwent exercise, dobutamine and dipyridamole echocardiography on different days 4-6 weeks after MI. Left ventricular wall motion was analyzed using 5-grade/16-segment model and myocardial ischemia was considered as a worsening of the wall motion score index (WMSI) during the stress test; myocardial viability was defined as a reduction of WMSI during low dose dobutamine. Dyskinesis formation was defined by visual analysis as akinesis that became dyskinetic or if the dyskinesis worsened. Both exercise and dobutamine induced ST-segment elevation, but dipyridamole did not. There was no significant difference in the degree of ST-segment elevation between the patients with and without myocardial ischemia or dyskinesis formation. Exercise induced a higher ST-segment elevation in patients with myocardial viability than those without (0.17+/-0.09 mV vs 0.09+/-0.07 mV, p<0.05). Exercise-induced ST-segment elevations correlated with dobutamine-induced ST-segment elevations (p<0.01), changes in heart rate (p<0.05) and systolic blood pressure (p<0.05). In conclusions, stress-induced ST-segment elevation does not correlate with either myocardial ischemia or stress-induced dyskinesis, but may be associated with myocardial viability.","PeriodicalId":14544,"journal":{"name":"Japanese circulation journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"1029-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese circulation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/JCJ.65.1029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Stress-induced ST-segment elevation following myocardial infarction (MI) has been correlated with myocardial ischemia, viability and wall motion abnormality, but its mechanism is still unclear, so the present study compared ST-segment elevation and wall motion response during exercise, dobutamine and dipyridamole stresses. Twenty-five patients with their first anterior MI underwent exercise, dobutamine and dipyridamole echocardiography on different days 4-6 weeks after MI. Left ventricular wall motion was analyzed using 5-grade/16-segment model and myocardial ischemia was considered as a worsening of the wall motion score index (WMSI) during the stress test; myocardial viability was defined as a reduction of WMSI during low dose dobutamine. Dyskinesis formation was defined by visual analysis as akinesis that became dyskinetic or if the dyskinesis worsened. Both exercise and dobutamine induced ST-segment elevation, but dipyridamole did not. There was no significant difference in the degree of ST-segment elevation between the patients with and without myocardial ischemia or dyskinesis formation. Exercise induced a higher ST-segment elevation in patients with myocardial viability than those without (0.17+/-0.09 mV vs 0.09+/-0.07 mV, p<0.05). Exercise-induced ST-segment elevations correlated with dobutamine-induced ST-segment elevations (p<0.01), changes in heart rate (p<0.05) and systolic blood pressure (p<0.05). In conclusions, stress-induced ST-segment elevation does not correlate with either myocardial ischemia or stress-induced dyskinesis, but may be associated with myocardial viability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肌梗死后应激性st段抬高及其在壁运动异常、心肌缺血和活力中的作用:运动、多巴酚丁胺和双嘧达莫反应的比较
心肌梗死(MI)后应激性st段升高与心肌缺血、活力和壁运动异常相关,但其机制尚不清楚,因此本研究比较了运动、多巴酚丁胺和双嘧达莫应激时st段升高和壁运动反应。25例首次前路心肌梗死患者在心肌梗死后4-6周的不同天进行运动、多巴酚丁胺和双嘧达莫超声心动图检查,采用5级/16节段模型分析左室壁运动,并将心肌缺血视为压力测试时壁运动评分指数(WMSI)的恶化;心肌活力被定义为在低剂量多巴酚丁胺作用下WMSI的减少。运动障碍的形成被视觉分析定义为运动障碍变为运动障碍或运动障碍恶化。运动和多巴酚丁胺均引起st段抬高,但双嘧达莫没有。有无心肌缺血或运动障碍患者的st段抬高程度无显著差异。运动对心肌存活患者st段抬高的诱导作用高于无运动组(0.17+/-0.09 mV vs 0.09+/-0.07 mV, p<0.05)。运动诱导的st段升高与多巴酚丁胺诱导的st段升高(p<0.01)、心率变化(p<0.05)和收缩压变化(p<0.05)相关。总之,应激诱导的st段抬高与心肌缺血或应激诱导的运动障碍无关,但可能与心肌活力有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous onset of torsade de pointes in long-QT syndrome and the role of sympathovagal imbalance. Comparison of glucose-insulin-thallium-201 infusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), stress-redistribution-reinjection thallium-201 SPECT and low dose dobutamine echocardiography for prediction of reversible dysfunction. Differences in the expression of protein kinase C isoforms and its translocation after stimulation with phorbol ester between young-adult and middle-aged ventricular cardiomyocytes isolated from Fischer 344 rats. Electrophysiological characteristics and radiofrequency ablation of focal atrial tachycardia originating from the superior vena cava. Spectral characteristics of human atrial fibrillation waves of the right atrial free wall with respect to the duration of atrial fibrillation and effect of class I antiarrhythmic drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1