The sustainability of Swedish fiscal policy: a re-examination

A. Ndoricimpa
{"title":"The sustainability of Swedish fiscal policy: a re-examination","authors":"A. Ndoricimpa","doi":"10.1108/jed-04-2020-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study reexamines the sustainability of fiscal policy in Sweden.,To test the sustainability of fiscal policy, two approaches are used; the methodology of Kejriwal and Perron (2010), testing for multiple structural changes in a cointegrated regression model and time-varying cointegration test of Bierens and Martins (2010), and Martins (2015).,Using the first approach of testing for multiple structural changes in a cointegrated regression model, the results indicate that government spending and revenue are cointegrated with two breaks. An estimation of a two-break long-run model shows that the slope coefficient increases from 0.678 to 0.892 from the first to the second regime, implying that fiscal deficits were weakly sustainable in the first two regimes, from 1800 to 1943, and from 1944 to 1974. Further, results from time-varying cointegration test indicate that cointegration between spending and revenue in Sweden is time-varying. Fiscal deficits were found to be unsustainable for the periods 1801–1811, 1831–1838, 1853–1860 , 1872–1882, 1897–1902, 1929–1940 and 1976–1982 and weakly sustainable over the rest of the study period.,A number of implications arise from this study: (1) Accounting for breaks in cointegration analysis and in the estimation of the level relationship between spending and revenue is very important because ignoring breaks may lead to an overestimated slope coefficient and hence a bias on the magnitude of fiscal deficit sustainability. (2) In testing for cointegration between spending and revenue, assuming a constant cointegrating slope when it is actually time-varying can also be misleading because deficits can be sustainable for a period of time and unsustainable over another period.,The contribution of this study is three-fold; first, the study uses a long series of annual data spanning over a period of two centuries, from 1800 to 2011. Second, because of the importance of structural change in economics, to examine the existence of a level relationship between spending and revenue, the study uses the methodology of Kejriwal and Perron (2010) to test for multiple structural changes in a cointegrated regression model, as well as time-varying cointegration of Bierens and Martins (2010) and Martins (2015).","PeriodicalId":34568,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Development","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jed-04-2020-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study reexamines the sustainability of fiscal policy in Sweden.,To test the sustainability of fiscal policy, two approaches are used; the methodology of Kejriwal and Perron (2010), testing for multiple structural changes in a cointegrated regression model and time-varying cointegration test of Bierens and Martins (2010), and Martins (2015).,Using the first approach of testing for multiple structural changes in a cointegrated regression model, the results indicate that government spending and revenue are cointegrated with two breaks. An estimation of a two-break long-run model shows that the slope coefficient increases from 0.678 to 0.892 from the first to the second regime, implying that fiscal deficits were weakly sustainable in the first two regimes, from 1800 to 1943, and from 1944 to 1974. Further, results from time-varying cointegration test indicate that cointegration between spending and revenue in Sweden is time-varying. Fiscal deficits were found to be unsustainable for the periods 1801–1811, 1831–1838, 1853–1860 , 1872–1882, 1897–1902, 1929–1940 and 1976–1982 and weakly sustainable over the rest of the study period.,A number of implications arise from this study: (1) Accounting for breaks in cointegration analysis and in the estimation of the level relationship between spending and revenue is very important because ignoring breaks may lead to an overestimated slope coefficient and hence a bias on the magnitude of fiscal deficit sustainability. (2) In testing for cointegration between spending and revenue, assuming a constant cointegrating slope when it is actually time-varying can also be misleading because deficits can be sustainable for a period of time and unsustainable over another period.,The contribution of this study is three-fold; first, the study uses a long series of annual data spanning over a period of two centuries, from 1800 to 2011. Second, because of the importance of structural change in economics, to examine the existence of a level relationship between spending and revenue, the study uses the methodology of Kejriwal and Perron (2010) to test for multiple structural changes in a cointegrated regression model, as well as time-varying cointegration of Bierens and Martins (2010) and Martins (2015).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞典财政政策的可持续性:重新审视
本研究重新审视了瑞典财政政策的可持续性。为了检验财政政策的可持续性,本文采用了两种方法;Kejriwal和Perron(2010)的方法,协整回归模型中多重结构变化的检验以及Bierens和Martins(2010)和Martins(2015)的时变协整检验。采用协整回归模型检验多元结构变化的第一种方法,结果表明政府支出和收入与两个断裂共整。对一个双断点长期模型的估计表明,从第一种制度到第二种制度,斜率系数从0.678增加到0.892,这意味着财政赤字在1800年至1943年和1944年至1974年的前两种制度中是弱可持续性的。此外,时变协整检验的结果表明,瑞典的支出与收入之间的协整是时变的。在1801-1811年、1831-1838年、1853-1860年、1872-1882年、1897-1902年、1929-1940年和1976-1982年期间,财政赤字是不可持续的,在研究期间的其余时间里,财政赤字的可持续性较弱。本研究产生了许多影响:(1)在协整分析和支出与收入之间水平关系的估计中考虑断裂是非常重要的,因为忽略断裂可能导致高估斜率系数,从而导致对财政赤字可持续性程度的偏差。(2)在测试支出和收入之间的协整时,假设一个恒定的协整斜率实际上是时变的,也可能会产生误导,因为赤字可能在一段时间内是可持续的,而在另一段时间内是不可持续的。本研究的贡献有三方面;首先,该研究使用了从1800年到2011年两个世纪的长期年度数据。其次,由于结构变化在经济学中的重要性,为了检验支出和收入之间是否存在水平关系,本研究使用了Kejriwal和Perron(2010)的方法来检验协整回归模型中的多重结构变化,以及Bierens和Martins(2010)和Martins(2015)的时变协整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of technical change on income inequality in Vietnam Asymmetric thresholds of macroeconomic volatility's impact on stock volatility in developing economies: a study in Vietnam Mobile money, food security and coping strategies in a post-conflict and fragile context: evidence from Burundi The effect of financial inclusion and economic integration on green growth in ASEAN Optimum firm size in Vietnam: does subcontracting matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1