Incidence of Early Postpartum Voiding Dysfunction in Primiparae: Comparison Between Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Pub Date : 2013-07-29 DOI:10.1111/luts.12027
Hazem AL-MANDEEL, Ahmed AL-BADR, Ghadeer AL-SHAIKH
{"title":"Incidence of Early Postpartum Voiding Dysfunction in Primiparae: Comparison Between Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section","authors":"Hazem AL-MANDEEL,&nbsp;Ahmed AL-BADR,&nbsp;Ghadeer AL-SHAIKH","doi":"10.1111/luts.12027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the incidence of early postpartum voiding dysfunction (PPVD) in primiparae women delivered vaginally (VD) to those delivered by elective Caesarean section (CS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective study of primiparae in early postpartum period, were grouped into: VD group and CS group. Following the first 24 h from delivery, patients had uroflowmetry and post-void residual urine (PVR) volume measurement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred and fifty six primiparae women recruited; 204 (81%) had VD and 48 (19%) had primary elective CS. Forty-two women in the VD group (20.2%) diagnosed with PPVD compared to only four (8.3%) in the CS group (<i>P</i> = 0.05). Within VD group, women who had vaginal tear (86.4% vs. 44%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) or epidural analgesia (33.3% vs. 18.1%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) experienced higher incidence of PPVD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Women who had normal VD are at higher risk of transient PPVD than those delivered by CS during their early postpartum period.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18028,"journal":{"name":"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms","volume":"6 2","pages":"103-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/luts.12027","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/luts.12027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the incidence of early postpartum voiding dysfunction (PPVD) in primiparae women delivered vaginally (VD) to those delivered by elective Caesarean section (CS).

Methods

A prospective study of primiparae in early postpartum period, were grouped into: VD group and CS group. Following the first 24 h from delivery, patients had uroflowmetry and post-void residual urine (PVR) volume measurement.

Results

Two hundred and fifty six primiparae women recruited; 204 (81%) had VD and 48 (19%) had primary elective CS. Forty-two women in the VD group (20.2%) diagnosed with PPVD compared to only four (8.3%) in the CS group (P = 0.05). Within VD group, women who had vaginal tear (86.4% vs. 44%, P < 0.001) or epidural analgesia (33.3% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.05) experienced higher incidence of PPVD.

Conclusion

Women who had normal VD are at higher risk of transient PPVD than those delivered by CS during their early postpartum period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初产妇产后早期排尿功能障碍的发生率:阴道分娩与剖宫产的比较
目的比较顺产(VD)和择期剖宫产(CS)初产妇产后早期排尿功能障碍(PPVD)的发生率。方法对产后早期初产妇进行前瞻性研究,分为:VD组和CS组。分娩后24小时,患者进行尿流仪和空后残余尿(PVR)体积测量。结果共招募初产妇256例;204例(81%)有VD, 48例(19%)有原发性选择性CS。VD组中42名女性(20.2%)被诊断为PPVD,而CS组中只有4名(8.3%)被诊断为PPVD (P = 0.05)。在VD组中,阴道撕裂(86.4% vs. 44%, P < 0.001)或硬膜外镇痛(33.3% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.05)的女性PPVD发生率更高。结论正常VD的妇女在产后早期发生短暂性PPVD的风险高于经CS分娩的妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: LUTS is designed for the timely communication of peer-reviewed studies which provides new clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers in the field of neurourology, urodynamics and urogynecology. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished referees from around the world, some of whom constitute the journal''s Editorial Board. The journal covers both basic and clinical research on lower urinary tract dysfunctions (LUTD), such as overactive bladder (OAB), detrusor underactivity, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse (POP), painful bladder syndrome (PBS), as well as on other relevant conditions. Case reports are published only if new findings are provided. LUTS is an official journal of the Japanese Continence Society, the Korean Continence Society, and the Taiwanese Continence Society. Submission of papers from all countries are welcome. LUTS has been accepted into Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) with a 2011 Impact Factor.
期刊最新文献
Retrospective Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Elderly and Non-Elderly Patients With Benign Prostatic Enlargement Using Holmium Laser Enucleation and Transurethral Vaporization of the Prostate at Multiple High-Volume Centers Issue Information Digit Length Ratio as an Indicator of Fetal Androgen Levels: Relationship to Prostate Volume-Related Men Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms The Effect of Providing Video-Animated Information to Female Patients With Stress Urinary Incontinence Before the Urodynamic Study on the Patient's Anxiety, Pain, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Repeat the Procedure Usefulness of Mesh Reinforcement in Pubic Fixation Urethral Sling Surgery for Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1