Gerda Walther and the Possibility of Telepathy as an Act of Personal Social Mind

A. Calcagno
{"title":"Gerda Walther and the Possibility of Telepathy as an Act of Personal Social Mind","authors":"A. Calcagno","doi":"10.5840/symposium2022261/24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The phenomenologist Gerda Walther posits the possibility of a new social act, which she terms telepathy. It is marked by an intimate in-terpersonal union in which ego and alter ego become capable of sharing in the identical lived experience, though distant from one an-other. Here, there is no fusion or collective identi􀏔ication; rather, in-dividuals, though they live the experience and mind of the other, never lose or transcend their own individuation. Unlike the act of em-pathy, there is no analogical transfer. This article defends the possi-bility of a restricted sense telepathy. The author argues that four conditions must be ful􀏔illed for telepathy to occur: recognition of a social drive; a partially willed act of mind that results in the assump-tion of a certain stance, but it also comes upon us as an experience; constitution of subjects as persons marked by a “fundamental es-sence”; and I-splitting.","PeriodicalId":34988,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/symposium2022261/24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The phenomenologist Gerda Walther posits the possibility of a new social act, which she terms telepathy. It is marked by an intimate in-terpersonal union in which ego and alter ego become capable of sharing in the identical lived experience, though distant from one an-other. Here, there is no fusion or collective identi􀏔ication; rather, in-dividuals, though they live the experience and mind of the other, never lose or transcend their own individuation. Unlike the act of em-pathy, there is no analogical transfer. This article defends the possi-bility of a restricted sense telepathy. The author argues that four conditions must be ful􀏔illed for telepathy to occur: recognition of a social drive; a partially willed act of mind that results in the assump-tion of a certain stance, but it also comes upon us as an experience; constitution of subjects as persons marked by a “fundamental es-sence”; and I-splitting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格尔达·瓦尔特和心灵感应作为一种个人社会心理行为的可能性
现象学家Gerda Walther提出了一种新的社会行为的可能性,她称之为心灵感应。它的特点是一种亲密的人际关系,在这种关系中,自我和另一个自我能够分享相同的生活经验,尽管彼此之间距离遥远。在这里,没有融合或集体认同􀏔ication;相反,个体虽然生活在他人的经验和思想中,但永远不会失去或超越自己的个体化。与emempathy的行为不同,没有类比转移。这篇文章为有限感觉心灵感应的可能性辩护。作者认为心灵感应的发生必须具备四个条件􀏔illed:对社会驱动力的认识;一种部分意志的心理行为,它导致假设某种立场,但它也作为一种经验出现在我们身上;主体作为人的构成,以“基本意义”为标志;和I-splitting。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
S1-3 Three examples of science translation to practice: opioid rotation, management of breakthrough pain, role of methadone S2-2 Supporting the integration of spiritual care as an essential component of palliative care S2-5 Embracing a spiritual and compassionate care for patients living with advanced and terminal illnesses with Existential and Spiritual Distress S3-2 Missing goldilocks and killing kant: the price of canada’s headlong assisted death expansion S3-1 The ethical, legal and professional landscape of physician hastened death
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1