Effects of Affiliative and Aggressive Humor On Creative Thinking

M. S. Rahman, Zhou Zhijin, M. K. Uddin
{"title":"Effects of Affiliative and Aggressive Humor On Creative Thinking","authors":"M. S. Rahman, Zhou Zhijin, M. K. Uddin","doi":"10.3329/dujbs.v31i1.57919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous correlational studies suggest that negative humor style such as aggressive humor style is negatively and positive humor style such as affiliative humor style is positively correlated with creativity. However, it is not yet to experimentally demonstrate the effect of aggressive and affiliative humor on creativity. Therefore, this experimental study was designed to investigate the effect of affiliative humor (AF) and aggressive humor (AG) on creative thinking. The researcher included 60 (38 male, 22 female) participants and randomly assigned 20 in each of AF, AG, and control conditions. To induce humor, theyused12 jokes in each condition. They used Remote Association Task (RAT) for convergent thinking and Alternative Use of task (AUT) for divergent thinking to measure individual creativity. The author expected that (i) people who engage in affiliative humor would perform better at convergent thinking tasks than the control group and the aggressive humor group, (ii) people who engage in affiliative humor would perform better at divergent thinking tasks than the control group and aggressive humor group. Results showed that the affiliative humor successfully induced convergent thinking better than the control group and aggressive humor in the RAT score. Similarly, AF humor successfully induced better creativity than the control group and AG humor group in three components of divergent thinking; fluency, flexibility, and elaboration. However, the mean score of AF humor was better than the AG humor group but not significant. In addition, aggressive humor, likewise affiliative humor, also induced creative thinking in the RAT task and AUT. Thus, the results partially supported all the hypotheses and indicated that in real life, humor induces individual creative thinking whether the humor is positive or negative, it doesn't matter. Both types of humor increase creative thinking.\nDhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci. 31(1): 93-104, 2022 (January)","PeriodicalId":11095,"journal":{"name":"Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbs.v31i1.57919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous correlational studies suggest that negative humor style such as aggressive humor style is negatively and positive humor style such as affiliative humor style is positively correlated with creativity. However, it is not yet to experimentally demonstrate the effect of aggressive and affiliative humor on creativity. Therefore, this experimental study was designed to investigate the effect of affiliative humor (AF) and aggressive humor (AG) on creative thinking. The researcher included 60 (38 male, 22 female) participants and randomly assigned 20 in each of AF, AG, and control conditions. To induce humor, theyused12 jokes in each condition. They used Remote Association Task (RAT) for convergent thinking and Alternative Use of task (AUT) for divergent thinking to measure individual creativity. The author expected that (i) people who engage in affiliative humor would perform better at convergent thinking tasks than the control group and the aggressive humor group, (ii) people who engage in affiliative humor would perform better at divergent thinking tasks than the control group and aggressive humor group. Results showed that the affiliative humor successfully induced convergent thinking better than the control group and aggressive humor in the RAT score. Similarly, AF humor successfully induced better creativity than the control group and AG humor group in three components of divergent thinking; fluency, flexibility, and elaboration. However, the mean score of AF humor was better than the AG humor group but not significant. In addition, aggressive humor, likewise affiliative humor, also induced creative thinking in the RAT task and AUT. Thus, the results partially supported all the hypotheses and indicated that in real life, humor induces individual creative thinking whether the humor is positive or negative, it doesn't matter. Both types of humor increase creative thinking. Dhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci. 31(1): 93-104, 2022 (January)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲和性和攻击性幽默对创造性思维的影响
以往的相关研究表明,攻击性幽默等消极幽默风格与创造力负相关,而亲和性幽默等积极幽默风格与创造力正相关。然而,目前还没有实验证明攻击性和亲和性幽默对创造力的影响。因此,本实验旨在探讨亲和性幽默(AF)和攻击性幽默(AG)对创造性思维的影响。研究人员包括60名参与者(38名男性,22名女性),并在AF、AG和对照组中随机分配20名。为了引起幽默,他们在每种情况下使用了12个笑话。他们用远程关联任务(RAT)测试收敛性思维,用任务替代使用(AUT)测试发散性思维来衡量个体创造力。作者期望:(i)参与附属幽默的人在收敛性思维任务上的表现优于对照组和攻击性幽默组,(ii)参与附属幽默的人在发散性思维任务上的表现优于对照组和攻击性幽默组。结果表明,亲和性幽默组在诱导聚合思维方面优于对照组和攻击性幽默组。同样,在发散思维的三个组成部分上,AF幽默成功地诱导了比对照组和AG幽默组更好的创造力;流利、灵活、细致。而AF幽默组的平均得分优于AG幽默组,但差异不显著。此外,攻击性幽默和隶属性幽默同样在RAT任务和AUT任务中诱发创造性思维。因此,研究结果部分支持了所有的假设,表明在现实生活中,幽默诱发个体的创造性思维,无论幽默是积极的还是消极的,都无关紧要。两种类型的幽默都能促进创造性思维。达卡大学。科学31(1):93-104,2022 (1)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Induction of mutation in Neurospora Crassa using neem (Azadirachta Indica A. Juss) leaf extract Assessing the relationship of prospective, retrospective, and everyday memory with cognitive failure among Bangladeshi adults Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on gender based violence: a study on TMSS microcredit members Exploring clinical features of children with autism in Bogura city of Bangladesh A taxonomic survey of pteridophytic flora of Lalmai Pahar and Mainamati of Cumilla district, Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1