Relevance and Feasibility of a Personalized Dietary Intervention in Older People with Meals-On-Wheels: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

JAR life Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.14283/jarlife.2020.9
S Fleury, C Sulmont-Rossé, H Cabanes, M Perruchaud, A Roger, B Lesourd, P Tronchon, V Van Wymelbeke-Delannoy, I Maître
{"title":"Relevance and Feasibility of a Personalized Dietary Intervention in Older People with Meals-On-Wheels: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.","authors":"S Fleury,&nbsp;C Sulmont-Rossé,&nbsp;H Cabanes,&nbsp;M Perruchaud,&nbsp;A Roger,&nbsp;B Lesourd,&nbsp;P Tronchon,&nbsp;V Van Wymelbeke-Delannoy,&nbsp;I Maître","doi":"10.14283/jarlife.2020.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aimed at assessing the feasibility and the effectiveness of a personalized dietary intervention in a meals-on-wheels service through a randomized controlled pilot trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sixty recipients of home-delivered meals (75% of women; 70-97 years old) were recruited and randomly assigned to a control and an experimental group and followed over a period of 4 months. In the experimental group, the nutritional status (Mini-Nutritional Assessment - MNA questionnaire), the food intake and the food preferences were measured for each participant. Based on this screening, participants were provided with dietary guidance and follow-up. Those at risk of malnutrition were proposed enriched home-delivered meals. Enrichment was set up considering food preferences of the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Looking at the whole sample at baseline, 80% (n=48/60) were at risk of malnutrition. Furthermore, 55% (n=33/60) ate less than 2/3 of their calorie and/or protein recommended allowances. In the experimental group, the intervention led to an increase of protein intakes and to a lower extent of calorie intake. In the control group, no significant changes were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To conclude, this study suggests that providing dietary guidance and adding nutrient-dense food to meals while considering food preferences is feasible and may help older beneficiaries of meals-on-wheels to increase calorie and protein intake and improve their nutritional status. However, there is a need to develop products or recipes to enrich the meals of the elderly more efficiently to achieve the recommended allowance.</p>","PeriodicalId":73537,"journal":{"name":"JAR life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002899/pdf/jarlife-9-040.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAR life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jarlife.2020.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed at assessing the feasibility and the effectiveness of a personalized dietary intervention in a meals-on-wheels service through a randomized controlled pilot trial.

Design: Sixty recipients of home-delivered meals (75% of women; 70-97 years old) were recruited and randomly assigned to a control and an experimental group and followed over a period of 4 months. In the experimental group, the nutritional status (Mini-Nutritional Assessment - MNA questionnaire), the food intake and the food preferences were measured for each participant. Based on this screening, participants were provided with dietary guidance and follow-up. Those at risk of malnutrition were proposed enriched home-delivered meals. Enrichment was set up considering food preferences of the participants.

Results: Looking at the whole sample at baseline, 80% (n=48/60) were at risk of malnutrition. Furthermore, 55% (n=33/60) ate less than 2/3 of their calorie and/or protein recommended allowances. In the experimental group, the intervention led to an increase of protein intakes and to a lower extent of calorie intake. In the control group, no significant changes were observed.

Conclusion: To conclude, this study suggests that providing dietary guidance and adding nutrient-dense food to meals while considering food preferences is feasible and may help older beneficiaries of meals-on-wheels to increase calorie and protein intake and improve their nutritional status. However, there is a need to develop products or recipes to enrich the meals of the elderly more efficiently to achieve the recommended allowance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人个性化饮食干预的相关性和可行性:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在通过随机对照试验,评估个性化饮食干预上门送餐服务的可行性和有效性。设计:60名接受家庭送餐的人(75%为女性;年龄70-97岁),随机分为对照组和实验组,随访4个月。在实验组中,测量了每个参与者的营养状况(迷你营养评估- MNA问卷)、食物摄入量和食物偏好。在此基础上,为参与者提供饮食指导和随访。那些有营养不良风险的人被建议在家里提供营养丰富的饭菜。浓缩是根据参与者的食物偏好设置的。结果:在基线时观察整个样本,80% (n=48/60)有营养不良的风险。此外,55% (n=33/60)的人摄入的卡路里和/或蛋白质少于推荐摄入量的2/3。在实验组中,干预导致蛋白质摄入量增加,卡路里摄入量降低。对照组无明显变化。结论:综上所述,本研究表明,在考虑食物偏好的同时,提供膳食指导,在膳食中添加营养密集的食物是可行的,可以帮助老年人增加热量和蛋白质的摄入,改善他们的营养状况。然而,有必要开发产品或食谱,以更有效地丰富老年人的膳食,以达到建议的津贴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sedentary Behaviour and Fall-related Injuries in Aging Adults: Results from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Effect of Modifiable Lifestyle Factors on Biological Aging. Metabolic Syndrome and Positive Frailty Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study with Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Does Nutritional Supplementation Have a Disease-Modifying Effect on the Alzheimer's Disease Neurodegenerative Process? Does Physical Exercise Modify the Pathophysiology of Alzheimer's Disease in Older Persons?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1