The mediating role of environmental innovation in the relationship between environmental management and firm performance in a multi-stakeholder environment

K. Grekova, H. Bremmers, J. Trienekens, R. Kemp, S. Omta
{"title":"The mediating role of environmental innovation in the relationship between environmental management and firm performance in a multi-stakeholder environment","authors":"K. Grekova, H. Bremmers, J. Trienekens, R. Kemp, S. Omta","doi":"10.3920/JCNS2013.1003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, firms are increasingly challenged to bridge potentially conflicting economic interests of primary commercial stakeholders and sustainability demands from secondary non-commercial stakeholder groups. While a number of firms view investments in environmental management as disconnected from their value-creating activities, others have reported achieved cost efficiency and differentiation advantages. Prior research suggests that environmental innovation might be the missing link between environmental management and firm performance. However, the mediating effect of environmental innovation in the relationship between environmental management and a firm’s performance had not been empirically tested so far. Our paper provides a contribution by conducting an empirical investigation into this possible mediating effect. Although the presumed mediating role of environmental innovation suggests that it is influenced by internal environmental management, environmental innovation literature is especially concerned with the role of external stakeholders in environmental innovation. This study investigates the role of the engagement of stakeholders such as supply chain partners, industry, and public authorities in environmental impact reduction. We hypothesise that environmental innovation positively mediates the relationship between environmental management and firm performance, and that the engagement of stakeholders has a positive impact on environmental innovation. The research model was tested with a variance-based structural equation model using data from 90 Dutch food and beverage firms. The results confirm the positive mediating effect of environmental process innovation on the relationship between environmental management and cost efficiency advantage. Environmental product innovation contributes to a differentiation advantage but it is not significantly influenced by environmental management. So we could not support a positive mediating effect of environmental product innovation on the relationship between environmental management and differentiation advantage. Instead, environmental collaboration with supply chain partners has a strong positive impact on environmental product innovation. It also positively influences environmental process innovation but this influence is much weaker than the influence of internal environmental management. Our findings can assist managers in their decision making regarding the implementation of environmental innovations and environmental collaboration with external parties. The study is also relevant to policy makers as a tool to assess the appropriateness of their policy.","PeriodicalId":17677,"journal":{"name":"Journal on Chain and Network Science","volume":"46 1","pages":"119-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on Chain and Network Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3920/JCNS2013.1003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Nowadays, firms are increasingly challenged to bridge potentially conflicting economic interests of primary commercial stakeholders and sustainability demands from secondary non-commercial stakeholder groups. While a number of firms view investments in environmental management as disconnected from their value-creating activities, others have reported achieved cost efficiency and differentiation advantages. Prior research suggests that environmental innovation might be the missing link between environmental management and firm performance. However, the mediating effect of environmental innovation in the relationship between environmental management and a firm’s performance had not been empirically tested so far. Our paper provides a contribution by conducting an empirical investigation into this possible mediating effect. Although the presumed mediating role of environmental innovation suggests that it is influenced by internal environmental management, environmental innovation literature is especially concerned with the role of external stakeholders in environmental innovation. This study investigates the role of the engagement of stakeholders such as supply chain partners, industry, and public authorities in environmental impact reduction. We hypothesise that environmental innovation positively mediates the relationship between environmental management and firm performance, and that the engagement of stakeholders has a positive impact on environmental innovation. The research model was tested with a variance-based structural equation model using data from 90 Dutch food and beverage firms. The results confirm the positive mediating effect of environmental process innovation on the relationship between environmental management and cost efficiency advantage. Environmental product innovation contributes to a differentiation advantage but it is not significantly influenced by environmental management. So we could not support a positive mediating effect of environmental product innovation on the relationship between environmental management and differentiation advantage. Instead, environmental collaboration with supply chain partners has a strong positive impact on environmental product innovation. It also positively influences environmental process innovation but this influence is much weaker than the influence of internal environmental management. Our findings can assist managers in their decision making regarding the implementation of environmental innovations and environmental collaboration with external parties. The study is also relevant to policy makers as a tool to assess the appropriateness of their policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多利益相关者环境下环境创新在环境管理与企业绩效关系中的中介作用
如今,企业面临着越来越大的挑战,即如何弥合主要商业利益相关者的潜在冲突经济利益和次要非商业利益相关者群体的可持续性需求。虽然一些公司认为环境管理方面的投资与其创造价值的活动脱节,但其他公司报告说取得了成本效率和差异化优势。先前的研究表明,环境创新可能是环境管理与企业绩效之间缺失的一环。然而,环境创新在环境管理与企业绩效关系中的中介作用尚未得到实证检验。我们的论文通过对这种可能的中介效应进行实证调查提供了贡献。虽然假设环境创新的中介作用表明它受到内部环境管理的影响,但环境创新文献特别关注外部利益相关者在环境创新中的作用。本研究探讨了供应链合作伙伴、行业和公共当局等利益相关者在减少环境影响中的作用。我们假设环境创新正向中介环境管理与企业绩效之间的关系,并且利益相关者的参与对环境创新具有正向影响。利用90家荷兰食品和饮料公司的数据,采用基于方差的结构方程模型对研究模型进行了检验。研究结果证实了环境流程创新对环境管理与成本效率优势之间的正向中介作用。环境产品创新有助于企业的差异化优势,但环境管理对其影响不显著。因此,我们不能支持环境产品创新对环境管理与差异化优势之间的正向中介作用。相反,与供应链合作伙伴的环境合作对环境产品创新有很强的积极影响。企业内部环境管理对环境过程创新也有正向影响,但这种影响远弱于企业内部环境管理的影响。我们的研究结果可以帮助管理者在实施环境创新和与外部各方的环境合作方面做出决策。这项研究也与决策者有关,可作为评估其政策是否适当的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The interplay of structural and relational governance in innovation alliances Organizing vegetable supply chains: results of a survey of farmers Determinants of participation and intensity of participation in collective action: evidence from smallholder avocado farmers in Kenya Stakeholder roles for fostering ambidexterity in Sub-Saharan African agricultural netchains for the emergence of multi-stakeholder cooperatives Organisation of German livestock production from the bottom up: a new institutional economic analysis of dairy cattle breeding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1