Floating-Point Precision Tuning Using Blame Analysis

Cindy Rubio-González, Cuong Nguyen, Ben Mehne, Koushik Sen, J. Demmel, W. Kahan, Costin Iancu, W. Lavrijsen, D. Bailey, David G. Hough
{"title":"Floating-Point Precision Tuning Using Blame Analysis","authors":"Cindy Rubio-González, Cuong Nguyen, Ben Mehne, Koushik Sen, J. Demmel, W. Kahan, Costin Iancu, W. Lavrijsen, D. Bailey, David G. Hough","doi":"10.1145/2884781.2884850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While tremendously useful, automated techniques for tuning the precision of floating-point programs face important scalability challenges. We present Blame Analysis, a novel dynamic approach that speeds up precision tuning. Blame Analysis performs floating-point instructions using different levels of accuracy for their operands. The analysis determines the precision of all operands such that a given precision is achieved in the final result of the program. Our evaluation on ten scientific programs shows that Blame Analysis is successful in lowering operand precision. As it executes the program only once, the analysis is particularly useful when targeting reductions in execution time. In such case, the analysis needs to be combined with search-based tools such as Precimonious. Our experiments show that combining Blame Analysis with Precimonious leads to obtaining better results with significant reduction in analysis time: the optimized programs execute faster (in three cases, we observe as high as 39.9% program speedup) and the combined analysis time is 9× faster on average, and up to 38× faster than Precimonious alone.","PeriodicalId":6485,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"40 1","pages":"1074-1085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

While tremendously useful, automated techniques for tuning the precision of floating-point programs face important scalability challenges. We present Blame Analysis, a novel dynamic approach that speeds up precision tuning. Blame Analysis performs floating-point instructions using different levels of accuracy for their operands. The analysis determines the precision of all operands such that a given precision is achieved in the final result of the program. Our evaluation on ten scientific programs shows that Blame Analysis is successful in lowering operand precision. As it executes the program only once, the analysis is particularly useful when targeting reductions in execution time. In such case, the analysis needs to be combined with search-based tools such as Precimonious. Our experiments show that combining Blame Analysis with Precimonious leads to obtaining better results with significant reduction in analysis time: the optimized programs execute faster (in three cases, we observe as high as 39.9% program speedup) and the combined analysis time is 9× faster on average, and up to 38× faster than Precimonious alone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用故障分析进行浮点精度调优
虽然非常有用,但用于调优浮点程序精度的自动化技术面临着重要的可伸缩性挑战。我们提出了责备分析,一种新的动态方法,加快了精度调整。责备分析使用不同精度级别的操作数执行浮点指令。分析确定所有操作数的精度,以便在程序的最终结果中达到给定的精度。我们对十个科学方案的评价表明,责备分析在降低操作数精度方面是成功的。由于它只执行一次程序,因此在以减少执行时间为目标时,该分析特别有用。在这种情况下,分析需要与基于搜索的工具(如Precimonious)相结合。我们的实验表明,将Blame Analysis与Precimonious相结合,可以获得更好的结果,并显著减少分析时间:优化后的程序执行速度更快(在三个案例中,我们观察到高达39.9%的程序加速),组合分析时间平均快9倍,比单独使用Precimonious快38倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scalable Thread Sharing Analysis Overcoming Open Source Project Entry Barriers with a Portal for Newcomers Nomen est Omen: Exploring and Exploiting Similarities between Argument and Parameter Names Reliability of Run-Time Quality-of-Service Evaluation Using Parametric Model Checking On the Techniques We Create, the Tools We Build, and Their Misalignments: A Study of KLEE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1