Software Process Diversity: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Analysis of Impact on Project Performance

delete Pub Date : 2015-07-06 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2627173
Narayan Ramasubbu, A. Bharadwaj, G. Tayi
{"title":"Software Process Diversity: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Analysis of Impact on Project Performance","authors":"Narayan Ramasubbu, A. Bharadwaj, G. Tayi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2627173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates software process diversity, defined as the project condition arising out of the simultaneous use of multiple software development process frameworks within a single project. Software process diversity is conceptualized as the response of a project team to such contingencies as requirements volatility, design and technological novelty, customer involvement, and the level of organizational process compliance enforced on the project. Moreover, we conceptualize that the degree of fit (or match) between a project's software process diversity and the level of process compliance enforced on the project impacts overall project performance. This conceptualization was empirically tested by utilizing data collected from 410 large commercial software projects of a multinational firm. The results show that higher levels of requirements volatility, design and technological novelty, and customer involvement increased software process diversity within a project. However, software process diversity decreased relative to increases in the level of process compliance enforced on the project. A higher degree of fit between the process diversity and process compliance of a project, rather than the effects of those variables independently, was found to be significantly associated with a higher level of project performance, as measured in terms of project productivity and software quality. These results indicate that increasing software process diversity in response to project-level contingencies improves project performance only when there is a concomitant increase in organizational process compliance efforts. The implications of these results for research are discussed and prescriptive guidelines derived to manage the fit between process diversity and process compliance for improving software project performance.","PeriodicalId":11044,"journal":{"name":"delete","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"delete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2627173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

This article investigates software process diversity, defined as the project condition arising out of the simultaneous use of multiple software development process frameworks within a single project. Software process diversity is conceptualized as the response of a project team to such contingencies as requirements volatility, design and technological novelty, customer involvement, and the level of organizational process compliance enforced on the project. Moreover, we conceptualize that the degree of fit (or match) between a project's software process diversity and the level of process compliance enforced on the project impacts overall project performance. This conceptualization was empirically tested by utilizing data collected from 410 large commercial software projects of a multinational firm. The results show that higher levels of requirements volatility, design and technological novelty, and customer involvement increased software process diversity within a project. However, software process diversity decreased relative to increases in the level of process compliance enforced on the project. A higher degree of fit between the process diversity and process compliance of a project, rather than the effects of those variables independently, was found to be significantly associated with a higher level of project performance, as measured in terms of project productivity and software quality. These results indicate that increasing software process diversity in response to project-level contingencies improves project performance only when there is a concomitant increase in organizational process compliance efforts. The implications of these results for research are discussed and prescriptive guidelines derived to manage the fit between process diversity and process compliance for improving software project performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件过程多样性:对项目绩效影响的概念化、度量和分析
本文研究了软件过程多样性,定义为在单个项目中同时使用多个软件开发过程框架所产生的项目条件。软件过程多样性被概念化为项目团队对诸如需求波动、设计和技术新颖性、客户参与以及项目上执行的组织过程遵从程度等突发事件的响应。此外,我们概念化了项目的软件过程多样性和在项目上执行的过程遵从程度之间的契合度(或匹配度)会影响整个项目的性能。利用从一家跨国公司的410个大型商业软件项目中收集的数据,对这一概念进行了实证检验。结果表明,更高水平的需求波动性、设计和技术新颖性以及客户参与增加了项目中的软件过程多样性。然而,软件过程多样性相对于在项目上执行的过程遵从性水平的增加而减少。一个项目的过程多样性和过程遵从性之间的高度契合,而不是那些独立变量的影响,被发现与更高水平的项目绩效有显著的关联,正如在项目生产力和软件质量方面测量的那样。这些结果表明,增加软件过程多样性以响应项目级别的偶然性,只有在组织过程遵从性努力同时增加的情况下,才能提高项目性能。本文讨论了这些研究结果的含义,并导出了规范的指导方针,以管理过程多样性和过程遵从性之间的契合,从而改进软件项目的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Balanced Votes Method: A new perspective on symmetry in creating fair redistricting plans and measuring gerrymandering An in Vitro Study to Evaluate and Compare the Remineralizing Potential among Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate (CPP-ACP) with Fluoride and Surface Pre-Reacted Glass (S-PRG) Fillers Using Quantitative Analysis. Sport Sponsorship Announcement and Stock Returns: A Meta-Analytic Review How Shifting from In-Person to Virtual-Only Shareholder Meetings Affects Shareholders’ Voice Did Everything Change After 911? Not Everything!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1