A standardized technique for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/10225536231164028
Tao Wen, Huaming Xue, Tong Ma, Tao Yang, Long Xue, Yihui Tu
{"title":"A standardized technique for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Tao Wen,&nbsp;Huaming Xue,&nbsp;Tong Ma,&nbsp;Tao Yang,&nbsp;Long Xue,&nbsp;Yihui Tu","doi":"10.1177/10225536231164028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We developed a new standardized procedure for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of surgery in patients with osteoarthritis (OA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study recruited patients who underwent lateral UKA at our hospital between January 2014 and January 2016. Demographic characteristics and preoperative and postoperative American Knee Society (AKS) clinical scores (including pain, clinical, and knee mobility scores) were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 158 patients (35 male and 123 female) who underwent 160 lateral UKAs were analyzed. Their AKS clinical scores (0-100 points) improved from 53.1 ± 4.1 (range 45-62) preoperatively to 97.0 ± 1.7 (range 92-99) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) postoperatively with additional improvements of 9.1 ± 1.8 (range 3-14) to 47.3 ± 1.5 (range 45-49) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) for pain, 49.7 ± 9.7 (range 35-70) to 97.1 ± 4.1 (range 90-100) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) for function, and 105.0 ± 4.4° (equivalent to ∼100-115°) to 125.5 ± 5.3° (∼110-135°) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) for a range of motion (ROM). No patients required reoperations or revisions. Two patients were readmitted within 60 days due to severe knee swelling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lateral UKA protocol was reproducible and the patients had a good postoperative outcomes. Yet, large-scale, multi-center, prospective studies are needed to further confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48794,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":"10225536231164028"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536231164028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We developed a new standardized procedure for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of surgery in patients with osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods: This retrospective study recruited patients who underwent lateral UKA at our hospital between January 2014 and January 2016. Demographic characteristics and preoperative and postoperative American Knee Society (AKS) clinical scores (including pain, clinical, and knee mobility scores) were collected.

Results: A total of 158 patients (35 male and 123 female) who underwent 160 lateral UKAs were analyzed. Their AKS clinical scores (0-100 points) improved from 53.1 ± 4.1 (range 45-62) preoperatively to 97.0 ± 1.7 (range 92-99) (p < 0.001) postoperatively with additional improvements of 9.1 ± 1.8 (range 3-14) to 47.3 ± 1.5 (range 45-49) (p < 0.001) for pain, 49.7 ± 9.7 (range 35-70) to 97.1 ± 4.1 (range 90-100) (p < 0.001) for function, and 105.0 ± 4.4° (equivalent to ∼100-115°) to 125.5 ± 5.3° (∼110-135°) (p < 0.001) for a range of motion (ROM). No patients required reoperations or revisions. Two patients were readmitted within 60 days due to severe knee swelling.

Conclusion: The lateral UKA protocol was reproducible and the patients had a good postoperative outcomes. Yet, large-scale, multi-center, prospective studies are needed to further confirm our findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外侧单腔膝关节置换术的标准化技术。
目的:我们开发了一种新的标准的外侧单室膝关节置换术(UKA)的手术程序,以最大限度地提高骨关节炎(OA)患者的获益和最小化手术风险。方法:本回顾性研究招募2014年1月至2016年1月在我院行侧方UKA的患者。收集人口统计学特征和术前和术后美国膝关节学会(AKS)临床评分(包括疼痛、临床和膝关节活动度评分)。结果:共分析了158例(男性35例,女性123例)行160例外侧UKAs的患者。部临床评分(0 - 100分)提高从53.1±4.1(45 - 62)术前97.0±1.7(范围92 - 99)(p < 0.001),术后会进一步提升9.1±1.8(范围3 - 14)47.3±1.5(范围45-49)(p < 0.001),疼痛,49.7±9.7(35 - 70)97.1±4.1(范围90 - 100)(p < 0.001)功能,105.0±4.4°(相当于∼100 - 115°),125.5±5.3°(∼110 - 135°)(p < 0.001)活动度(ROM)。没有患者需要再手术或手术修复。2例患者因严重膝关节肿胀在60天内再次入院。结论:侧位UKA方案可重复性好,患者术后效果良好。然而,需要大规模、多中心、前瞻性的研究来进一步证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Does the use of polymethyl-methacrylate cement after intralesional curettage of giant cell tumors of appendicular bone guarantee reduced local recurrence rates? A retrospective analysis. Letter to the editor regarding "the analgesic effect and safety of duloxetine in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review". Orthopaedic surgery academic productivity - how do we measure up? Therapeutic effect of C-type natriuretic peptide on persistent pain in a rat knee arthritis model. Expression and diagnostic significance of integrin beta-2 in synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1