The Difference between Problem Based Learning Model and Discovery Learning Model on Students' Critical Thinking Ability

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI:10.23887/jlls.v5i2.49744
Andrian Arifianto, Henny Dewi Koeswanti
{"title":"The Difference between Problem Based Learning Model and Discovery Learning Model on Students' Critical Thinking Ability","authors":"Andrian Arifianto, Henny Dewi Koeswanti","doi":"10.23887/jlls.v5i2.49744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The success of teachers in carrying out the learning process is influenced by several factors, one of which is the accuracy in the selection of learning models. This study aims to analyze the differences between the PBL model and the discovery learning model in improving students' critical thinking skills. The sample of this research is 27 students. This research is an experimental study using a non-equivalent control group design. The instrument used to measure critical thinking skills is a questionnaire. Prerequisite test using normality test and homogeneity test. Data analysis used t-test (t-test for independent samples). The results showed that there were significant differences in students' critical thinking skills using the PBL model and the discovery learning model in fourth grade students. The difference in the average score of critical thinking skills in the PBL model gets an average score of 68.44, and the discovery learning model gets an average score of 57.09. Therefore, the PBL model can be interpreted as superior to the discovery learning model in terms of critical thinking skills. This is supported by the results of the t-test which has a sig (two-sided) value of 0.000 < 0.05, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. This means that the critical thinking ability of the PBL model is significantly more effective than the discovery learning model.","PeriodicalId":45210,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v5i2.49744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The success of teachers in carrying out the learning process is influenced by several factors, one of which is the accuracy in the selection of learning models. This study aims to analyze the differences between the PBL model and the discovery learning model in improving students' critical thinking skills. The sample of this research is 27 students. This research is an experimental study using a non-equivalent control group design. The instrument used to measure critical thinking skills is a questionnaire. Prerequisite test using normality test and homogeneity test. Data analysis used t-test (t-test for independent samples). The results showed that there were significant differences in students' critical thinking skills using the PBL model and the discovery learning model in fourth grade students. The difference in the average score of critical thinking skills in the PBL model gets an average score of 68.44, and the discovery learning model gets an average score of 57.09. Therefore, the PBL model can be interpreted as superior to the discovery learning model in terms of critical thinking skills. This is supported by the results of the t-test which has a sig (two-sided) value of 0.000 < 0.05, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. This means that the critical thinking ability of the PBL model is significantly more effective than the discovery learning model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
问题型学习模式与发现型学习模式对学生批判性思维能力的影响
教师能否成功地开展学习过程受到几个因素的影响,其中一个因素是学习模式选择的准确性。本研究旨在分析PBL模式与发现学习模式在提高学生批判性思维能力方面的差异。本研究的样本是27名学生。本研究是采用非等效对照组设计的实验研究。用来衡量批判性思维能力的工具是一份问卷。前提检验采用正态性检验和齐性检验。数据分析采用t检验(独立样本t检验)。结果表明,四年级学生使用PBL模式和发现学习模式在批判性思维技能方面存在显著差异。PBL模式与发现学习模式在批判性思维技能上的平均分差异为68.44分,发现学习模式在批判性思维技能上的平均分差异为57.09分。因此,在批判性思维技能方面,PBL模式可以被解释为优于发现学习模式。这得到了t检验结果的支持,其sig(双侧)值为0.000 < 0.05,Ho被拒绝,Ha被接受。这意味着PBL模式的批判性思维能力明显比发现学习模式更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies
International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
46.20%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The first journal of its kind, The International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies publishes lesson and learning studies that are pedagogically aimed at improving the quality of teaching and learning in formal educational settings. These studies may take the form of action research, design experiments, formative evaluations or pedagogical research more generally that is designed to foster a democratic, discursive and action orientated inquiry process. The editorial objective of the journal is to promote interdisciplinary and cross-national collaboration between groups of teacher educators, educational researchers and schoolteachers. The International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies (IJLLS) is the official journal of the World Association of Lesson Studies (WALS). WALS is an association of educational researchers and teaching professionals from various countries in the world who are dedicated to educational research that focuses directly on improving the quality of learning in classrooms and other formal learning environments through pedagogical experiments or action research.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between teacher leadership and teacher learning in Japanese lesson study: focusing on the knowledge-creation process Bringing academic disciplines together to focus on literacy: a secondary school case study Practicing variation theory beyond learning study The potential of lesson study in enhancing secondary school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical practices in lesson planning: evidence from Ethiopia The power of feedback in teacher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1