‘We want our own data!’: building Black community accountability in the collection of health data using a Black emancipatory action research approach

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Critical and Radical Social Work Pub Date : 2022-06-27 DOI:10.1332/204986021x16530491997004
Alicia Boatswain-Kyte, S. Brotman, Tiffany Callender, Barbara Dejean, J. Hanley, Nabeela Jivraj, Thierry Lindor, Jennifer Moran, Sean Muir, Dinesh Puspparajah
{"title":"‘We want our own data!’: building Black community accountability in the collection of health data using a Black emancipatory action research approach","authors":"Alicia Boatswain-Kyte, S. Brotman, Tiffany Callender, Barbara Dejean, J. Hanley, Nabeela Jivraj, Thierry Lindor, Jennifer Moran, Sean Muir, Dinesh Puspparajah","doi":"10.1332/204986021x16530491997004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community accountability is a model through which to redress anti-Black racism in health care and to create community-based participatory research about the health of Black Canadians. This article provides a case example of a study undertaken by a Black community collective in Quebec made up of researchers, activists, service providers, business leaders and their allies who sought community accountability in making visible the impact of COVID-19 on local Black communities. The principles articulated within the Black emancipatory action research approach (Akom, 2011) are used to ground an analysis of our research-activist process in order to illuminate how knowledge gained through the collection of data can be used to help inform Black communities about the realities, needs and concerns of their members, to advocate for rights and entitlements, and to work towards community accountability in research that empowers Black communities, both in Quebec and elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":44175,"journal":{"name":"Critical and Radical Social Work","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical and Radical Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204986021x16530491997004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community accountability is a model through which to redress anti-Black racism in health care and to create community-based participatory research about the health of Black Canadians. This article provides a case example of a study undertaken by a Black community collective in Quebec made up of researchers, activists, service providers, business leaders and their allies who sought community accountability in making visible the impact of COVID-19 on local Black communities. The principles articulated within the Black emancipatory action research approach (Akom, 2011) are used to ground an analysis of our research-activist process in order to illuminate how knowledge gained through the collection of data can be used to help inform Black communities about the realities, needs and concerns of their members, to advocate for rights and entitlements, and to work towards community accountability in research that empowers Black communities, both in Quebec and elsewhere.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们想要自己的数据!”':利用黑人解放行动研究方法,在收集卫生数据方面建立黑人社区问责制
社区问责制是纠正保健方面的反黑人种族主义和开展关于加拿大黑人健康的社区参与性研究的一种模式。本文提供了一个由魁北克黑人社区集体进行的一项研究的案例,该集体由研究人员、活动人士、服务提供者、商业领袖及其盟友组成,他们寻求社区问责,使COVID-19对当地黑人社区的影响可见。黑人解放行动研究方法中阐述的原则(Akom, 2011)用于对我们的研究活动过程进行分析,以阐明如何通过收集数据获得知识,帮助黑人社区了解其成员的现实、需求和关注点,倡导权利和权利,并在魁北克和其他地方的黑人社区赋权研究中努力实现社区问责制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Talking about needs and rights in inter-agency meetings: interpretive contests in Swedish welfare provision Maybe you can be too resilient: a sociological investigation into how student social workers perceive resilience in their practice Critique and Critical Social Work: a meta-theoretical perspective Who’s right? What rights? How? Rights debates in Irish social work: a call for nuance Lordship and bondage in the dialectics of social work: regulation and professional autonomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1