Policing Protest in a Pandemic

Dave Mead
{"title":"Policing Protest in a Pandemic","authors":"Dave Mead","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2021.1885323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to theDaily Mail, just before the move to a much fuller national lockdown in early November, and re-introduction of bans on outside gatherings of more than two, the Home Secretary Priti Patel ‘briefed chief constables over the weekend to tell officers to enforce the rules’. That is hard to square with longstanding notions of constabulary independence, most notably the well-known dicta in Blackburn. It illustrates well the rather strange, unchartered constitutional waters that we have been in these past six or so months when we consider the topic of protest and the way it is policed. This paper seeks to sketch out some of the terrain—if waters can have a terrain?— and to offer a few insights. It is in three main parts: an outline of the legal restrictions on ‘gatherings’—covering large-scale, staged protest events such as marches, rallies, demos, sit-ins and occupations—in the various Coronavirus Regulations, then a critique of those rules, followed by a discussion about some of the key policing aspects. This raises the immediate observation of a misplaced focus: ‘Protest as socio-political activity requires an appreciation and comprehension of the small-scale and everyday, a reclaiming of protest from below, to paraphrase E.P. Thompson’. Nonetheless, let us consider how the law has treated mass protests this year.","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"16 1","pages":"96 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1885323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

According to theDaily Mail, just before the move to a much fuller national lockdown in early November, and re-introduction of bans on outside gatherings of more than two, the Home Secretary Priti Patel ‘briefed chief constables over the weekend to tell officers to enforce the rules’. That is hard to square with longstanding notions of constabulary independence, most notably the well-known dicta in Blackburn. It illustrates well the rather strange, unchartered constitutional waters that we have been in these past six or so months when we consider the topic of protest and the way it is policed. This paper seeks to sketch out some of the terrain—if waters can have a terrain?— and to offer a few insights. It is in three main parts: an outline of the legal restrictions on ‘gatherings’—covering large-scale, staged protest events such as marches, rallies, demos, sit-ins and occupations—in the various Coronavirus Regulations, then a critique of those rules, followed by a discussion about some of the key policing aspects. This raises the immediate observation of a misplaced focus: ‘Protest as socio-political activity requires an appreciation and comprehension of the small-scale and everyday, a reclaiming of protest from below, to paraphrase E.P. Thompson’. Nonetheless, let us consider how the law has treated mass protests this year.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流行病中的警察抗议
据《每日邮报》报道,就在11月初实施更全面的全国封锁,并重新禁止两人以上的户外集会之前,内政大臣普里蒂·帕特尔“周末向警察局长通报了情况,告诉他们要执行这些规定”。这很难与长期以来警察独立的观念相一致,最著名的是布莱克本的名言。它很好地说明了在过去六个月左右的时间里,当我们考虑到抗议的话题及其监管方式时,我们所处的相当奇怪、未知的宪法水域。这篇论文试图勾勒出一些地形——如果水可以有地形?——并提供一些见解。它分为三个主要部分:概述各种冠状病毒条例中对“集会”的法律限制——包括游行、集会、示威、静坐和占领等大规模的、有组织的抗议活动,然后对这些规则进行批评,然后讨论一些关键的警务方面。这引起了对一个错位焦点的直接观察:“抗议作为一种社会政治活动,需要对小规模和日常的欣赏和理解,改写E.P.汤普森(E.P. Thompson)的话,是一种自下而上的抗议。”尽管如此,让我们考虑一下法律是如何对待今年的大规模抗议的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unity in diversity? Constitutional identities, deliberative processes and a ‘Border Poll’ in Ireland The Nation vs. the People. The unconstitutionality of secessionist referendums under Belgian constitutional law The impact of federalism on secession referendums: comparing Scotland and Québec Assessing the Legitimacy of Referendums as a Vehicle for Constitutional Amendment: Reform and Abolition of the Legislative Councils in Queensland and New South Wales Referendums and representation in democratic constitution making: Lessons from the failed Chilean constitutional experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1