Sustainability and Food: A Text Analysis of the Scientific Literature

Sara Fabbrizzi , Filomena Maggino , Nicola Marinelli , Silvio Menghini , Cecilia Ricci , Sandro Sacchelli
{"title":"Sustainability and Food: A Text Analysis of the Scientific Literature","authors":"Sara Fabbrizzi ,&nbsp;Filomena Maggino ,&nbsp;Nicola Marinelli ,&nbsp;Silvio Menghini ,&nbsp;Cecilia Ricci ,&nbsp;Sandro Sacchelli","doi":"10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper analyses the evolution of the research debate related to sustainability and to the relation between food and sustainability. A number of text analysis techniques were combined for the investigation of scientific papers. The results stress how discourse analysis of sustainability in the pre-Rio period is mostly associated with agriculture and with a vision where the ecological and environmental aspects are dominant. In the post-Rio phase, the discussion about sustainability, though still strongly linked to environmental issues, enters a holistic dimension that includes social elements. The themes of energy and the sustainability of urban areas become central, and the scientific debate stresses the importance of indicators within an assessment approach linked to the relevance of planning and intervention aspects. The focus on the role of food within the debate on sustainability highlights a food security oriented approach in the pre-Rio phase, with a particular attention towards agriculture and third world Countries. In the post-Rio period, the focus of the analysis moves towards developed Countries. Even though food security remains a strongly significant element of the debate, the attention shifts towards consumers and food choices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100063,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 670-679"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.077","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210784316300778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The paper analyses the evolution of the research debate related to sustainability and to the relation between food and sustainability. A number of text analysis techniques were combined for the investigation of scientific papers. The results stress how discourse analysis of sustainability in the pre-Rio period is mostly associated with agriculture and with a vision where the ecological and environmental aspects are dominant. In the post-Rio phase, the discussion about sustainability, though still strongly linked to environmental issues, enters a holistic dimension that includes social elements. The themes of energy and the sustainability of urban areas become central, and the scientific debate stresses the importance of indicators within an assessment approach linked to the relevance of planning and intervention aspects. The focus on the role of food within the debate on sustainability highlights a food security oriented approach in the pre-Rio phase, with a particular attention towards agriculture and third world Countries. In the post-Rio period, the focus of the analysis moves towards developed Countries. Even though food security remains a strongly significant element of the debate, the attention shifts towards consumers and food choices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续发展与食物:科学文献的文本分析
本文分析了有关可持续性以及粮食与可持续性之间关系的研究争论的演变。一些文本分析技术被结合起来用于科学论文的调查。研究结果强调,里约会议前可持续性的话语分析主要与农业有关,并与生态和环境方面占主导地位的愿景有关。在里约会议后阶段,关于可持续性的讨论虽然仍然与环境问题密切相关,但已进入包括社会因素在内的整体层面。能源和城市地区的可持续性的主题成为中心,科学辩论强调在与规划和干预方面的相关性有关的评估方法中指标的重要性。在关于可持续性的辩论中,对粮食作用的关注突出了里约会议前阶段面向粮食安全的做法,特别注意农业和第三世界国家。在里约会议后时期,分析的重点转向发达国家。尽管食品安全仍然是辩论中一个非常重要的因素,但人们的注意力已转向消费者和食品选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How the Nexus of Water/Food/Energy can be Seen with the Perspective of People well being and the Italian BES Framework Non Solo Cibo, Not Just Food: Which Compatibility between Consumers’ Ethical and Social Preoccupations and Trade and Commercial Law? Developing a Rating Model for Selection Solar Wood Drying Location A Preliminary Study on a New Approach to Estimate Water Resource Allocation: The Net Water Footprint Applied to Animal Products Grain Yield and Yield Components at Triticale under Different Technological Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1