From star rating to sentiment rating: using textual content of online reviews to develop more effective reputation systems for peer-to-peer accommodation platforms

IF 1.7 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Business Analytics Pub Date : 2022-09-13 DOI:10.1080/2573234X.2022.2122880
H. Zolbanin, Donald Wynn
{"title":"From star rating to sentiment rating: using textual content of online reviews to develop more effective reputation systems for peer-to-peer accommodation platforms","authors":"H. Zolbanin, Donald Wynn","doi":"10.1080/2573234X.2022.2122880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Star ratings on P2P accommodation platforms are highly positive. Such biases have led many users to utilise selective processing strategies to evaluate the textual content of online reviews. However, when many reviews are available for a product or a service, these strategies would be suboptimal at best, posing several challenges to the users of peer-to-peer (P2P) accommodation platforms. To enable the guests to perform more informed evaluations and overcome the challenges that the skewed distribution of star ratings creates for decision-making, we employ content analysis tools to derive an aggregated sentiment score for each listing. Using this score, we define a new measure, called “sentiment rating”, that compares a listing with other similar listings based on their textual reviews. Our choice-based conjoint experiment suggests that unlike users’ initial perception about the function of star rating as the most salient factor in evaluating P2P listings, users actually attribute more importance to sentiment ratings of P2P accommodations. Therefore, a text-based summary of online reviews would indeed help users in evaluating alternatives on a P2P platform and in decision making. We argue that a text-based quantitative summary of user reviews could be a useful supplements to (or substitutes for) star ratings on P2P accommodation platforms and even online retailing websites.","PeriodicalId":36417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2022.2122880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Star ratings on P2P accommodation platforms are highly positive. Such biases have led many users to utilise selective processing strategies to evaluate the textual content of online reviews. However, when many reviews are available for a product or a service, these strategies would be suboptimal at best, posing several challenges to the users of peer-to-peer (P2P) accommodation platforms. To enable the guests to perform more informed evaluations and overcome the challenges that the skewed distribution of star ratings creates for decision-making, we employ content analysis tools to derive an aggregated sentiment score for each listing. Using this score, we define a new measure, called “sentiment rating”, that compares a listing with other similar listings based on their textual reviews. Our choice-based conjoint experiment suggests that unlike users’ initial perception about the function of star rating as the most salient factor in evaluating P2P listings, users actually attribute more importance to sentiment ratings of P2P accommodations. Therefore, a text-based summary of online reviews would indeed help users in evaluating alternatives on a P2P platform and in decision making. We argue that a text-based quantitative summary of user reviews could be a useful supplements to (or substitutes for) star ratings on P2P accommodation platforms and even online retailing websites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从星级评价到情感评价:利用在线评论的文本内容,为点对点住宿平台开发更有效的信誉系统
P2P住宿平台的星级评价非常积极。这种偏见导致许多用户使用选择性处理策略来评估在线评论的文本内容。然而,当一个产品或服务有很多评论时,这些策略充其量是次优的,给点对点(P2P)住宿平台的用户带来了一些挑战。为了使客人能够进行更明智的评估,并克服星级评级的倾斜分布给决策带来的挑战,我们使用内容分析工具为每个列表获得汇总的情感得分。使用这个分数,我们定义了一个新的度量,称为“情绪评级”,它根据文本评论将一个列表与其他类似列表进行比较。我们基于选择的联合实验表明,与用户最初认为星级评价是评估P2P房源最显著的因素不同,用户实际上更重视P2P住宿的情感评级。因此,基于文本的在线评论摘要确实有助于用户在P2P平台上评估备选方案和决策。我们认为,基于文本的用户评论定量摘要可能是P2P住宿平台甚至在线零售网站星级评级的有用补充(或替代)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business Analytics
Journal of Business Analytics Business, Management and Accounting-Management Information Systems
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Decoding technological frames: a qualitative inquiry into business analytics perspectives Maximising competitive advantage: the role of strategic business analytics framework in business strategies Data Analytics for Societal Challenges: Examining Student Participation in the National School Lunch Program Exploring the relationship between YouTube video optimisation practices and video rankings for online marketing: a machine learning approach The era of business analytics: identifying and ranking the differences between business intelligence and data science from practitioners’ perspective using the Delphi method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1