Rating inter-rater reliability of Shih–Hsu Test of attention between an experienced psychiatric occupational therapist and an occupational therapy student: A pilot study

Yi-Nuo Shih, Chia-Chun Wu, Pei-En Shih, Jia- Hsu, Yin- Liao
{"title":"Rating inter-rater reliability of Shih–Hsu Test of attention between an experienced psychiatric occupational therapist and an occupational therapy student: A pilot study","authors":"Yi-Nuo Shih, Chia-Chun Wu, Pei-En Shih, Jia- Hsu, Yin- Liao","doi":"10.4103/tpsy.tpsy_26_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The “Shih-Hsu Test of Attention” (SHTA) is an iPad-based attention assessment tool developed by occupational therapists in recent years, and has acceptable criterion-related validity and high test–retest reliability in preliminary application. In this study, we intended to explore the inter-rater reliability of SHTA between experienced and inexperienced occupational therapists. Methods: We recruited 24 voluntary study participants aged 20–24 years in this study. The participants completed twice the SHTA by an experienced occupational therapist and an occupational therapy student. Results: Analytical results showed that the inter-rater reliability between experienced and inexperienced occupational therapists using SHTA had satisfactory reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.65). Conclusion: Our preliminary findings showed that the new attention assessment tool, SHTA, had satisfactory inter-rater reliability between experienced and occupational therapy students. We need to wait for a future study with more numbers of study participants in both groups to strengthen the study finding of this pilot study. At this moment, we suggest improving the guidance and training for inexperienced occupational therapists to improve accuracy, and reducing the gap when testing with experienced occupational therapists in future.","PeriodicalId":22278,"journal":{"name":"Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tpsy.tpsy_26_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The “Shih-Hsu Test of Attention” (SHTA) is an iPad-based attention assessment tool developed by occupational therapists in recent years, and has acceptable criterion-related validity and high test–retest reliability in preliminary application. In this study, we intended to explore the inter-rater reliability of SHTA between experienced and inexperienced occupational therapists. Methods: We recruited 24 voluntary study participants aged 20–24 years in this study. The participants completed twice the SHTA by an experienced occupational therapist and an occupational therapy student. Results: Analytical results showed that the inter-rater reliability between experienced and inexperienced occupational therapists using SHTA had satisfactory reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.65). Conclusion: Our preliminary findings showed that the new attention assessment tool, SHTA, had satisfactory inter-rater reliability between experienced and occupational therapy students. We need to wait for a future study with more numbers of study participants in both groups to strengthen the study finding of this pilot study. At this moment, we suggest improving the guidance and training for inexperienced occupational therapists to improve accuracy, and reducing the gap when testing with experienced occupational therapists in future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经验精神科职业治疗师与职业治疗学生之Shih-Hsu注意测验信度评定之初步研究
目的:“施许注意测验”(Shih-Hsu Test of Attention, SHTA)是近年来由职业治疗师开发的一种基于ipad的注意评估工具,在初步应用中具有良好的标准相关效度和较高的重测信度。本研究旨在探讨经验丰富与经验不足的职业治疗师间SHTA的信度。方法:我们招募了24名年龄在20-24岁之间的志愿者。参与者分别由一名经验丰富的职业治疗师和一名职业治疗学生完成两次SHTA。结果:分析结果显示,经验丰富的职业治疗师和经验不足的职业治疗师在使用SHTA时具有满意的信度(类内相关系数= 0.65)。结论:我们的初步研究结果表明,新的注意力评估工具SHTA在经验治疗学生和职业治疗学生之间具有令人满意的信度。我们需要等待未来的研究,在两组中有更多的研究参与者,以加强本初步研究的研究发现。此时,我们建议加强对经验不足的职业治疗师的指导和培训,以提高准确性,并在未来减少与经验丰富的职业治疗师测试时的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Addressing burnout problems among postgraduate trainee doctors: Reflexing on the article “Prevalence of Burnout and Psychiatric Illness among Postgraduate Trainee Doctors of a Tertiary Care Hospital” Sexually transmitted infections among adolescent and young adult patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder Suicide attempts and self-harm in adolescent patients: A series of three cases from Taiwan Freudian three elements in psychoanalysis needs the fourth element reticula What i have learned from French psychiatry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1