Standards of Care for Research in Group Work

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal for Specialists in Group Work Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/01933922.2021.1942347
Clark D. Ausloos, Zachary D. Bloom, Kristopher M. Goodrich, K. M. Hunnicutt Hollenbaugh, John J. Taylor, Caitlyn Bennett, Ashley J Blount, Jennifer Gerlach, Katy Schroeder
{"title":"Standards of Care for Research in Group Work","authors":"Clark D. Ausloos, Zachary D. Bloom, Kristopher M. Goodrich, K. M. Hunnicutt Hollenbaugh, John J. Taylor, Caitlyn Bennett, Ashley J Blount, Jennifer Gerlach, Katy Schroeder","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2021.1942347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Standards of Care for Research in Group Work were developed in partnership between the Association for Assessment in Research in Counseling (AARC) and the Association for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW). The purpose of these standards is to highlight empirically validated and literature-supported practices for conducting research in group work, as there are methodological and design considerations that are unique to group work research. These include, but are not limited to, small sample sizes that are often inherent in group work, the dependence of variables when measured in a group setting, historical lack of empirical rigor in group work research, and the need for theoretical and methodological congruence in qualitative research. During the development of this document, the committee used extant research standards to guide and center our efforts, and it was our intent for these standards to be used in conjunction with other established research standards. We also recognized the need to emphasize quantitative and qualitative research guidelines to encompass the importance of both types of research in the counseling field; and to highlight the importance of recognition and attention to concerns related to conducting group work research with participants from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":"27 1","pages":"244 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2021.1942347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Standards of Care for Research in Group Work were developed in partnership between the Association for Assessment in Research in Counseling (AARC) and the Association for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW). The purpose of these standards is to highlight empirically validated and literature-supported practices for conducting research in group work, as there are methodological and design considerations that are unique to group work research. These include, but are not limited to, small sample sizes that are often inherent in group work, the dependence of variables when measured in a group setting, historical lack of empirical rigor in group work research, and the need for theoretical and methodological congruence in qualitative research. During the development of this document, the committee used extant research standards to guide and center our efforts, and it was our intent for these standards to be used in conjunction with other established research standards. We also recognized the need to emphasize quantitative and qualitative research guidelines to encompass the importance of both types of research in the counseling field; and to highlight the importance of recognition and attention to concerns related to conducting group work research with participants from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小组研究的关怀标准
小组工作研究护理标准是由咨询研究评估协会(AARC)和小组工作专家协会(ASGW)合作制定的。这些标准的目的是强调在小组工作中进行研究的经验验证和文献支持的实践,因为小组工作研究有独特的方法和设计考虑。这些问题包括,但不限于,小组工作中通常固有的小样本量,在小组环境中测量变量的依赖性,小组工作研究中历史上缺乏经验严谨性,以及定性研究中理论和方法一致性的需要。在本文件的开发过程中,委员会使用现有的研究标准来指导和集中我们的工作,我们的意图是将这些标准与其他已建立的研究标准结合起来使用。我们还认识到有必要强调定量和定性研究准则,以包括这两种研究在咨询领域的重要性;并强调承认和关注与来自不同和代表性不足背景的参与者进行小组工作研究有关的问题的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Experiential Group Training in Developing Leadership Self-Efficacy of Counselors-In-Training Using Reflecting Teams in Solution-Focused Group Counseling Experiential Training for Master’s Students Exploring Multimodality with Online Peer-Facilitated Experiential Learning in Group Work Training The Achieving Success Everyday (ASE) Group Counseling Model Applied in Rural Schools: Implications for Future School Counselor Training and Practice Examining a Cohesion-Focused Model in Experiential Growth Groups: A Single Case Research Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1