CORRESPONDENCE OF HEISENBERG’S VIEWS WITH THE MULTIMODULAR CONCEPT OF A.V. AND L.A. BUROV

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-154-160
I. A. Rybakova
{"title":"CORRESPONDENCE OF HEISENBERG’S VIEWS WITH THE MULTIMODULAR CONCEPT OF A.V. AND L.A. BUROV","authors":"I. A. Rybakova","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-154-160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to a brief analysis of the views of the German physicist in their comparison with the concept of the metaphysical foundations of the universe of modern physicists Alexei Vladimirovich and Lev Alekseevich Burov. The object of the study is the main philosophical work of Heisenberg - the treatise “The Order of Reality” - and the work of the Drillers called “Metaphysical Status of physical Laws”. The metaphysical concepts of the multimodular reality of the mentioned authors are compared, and a brief historical basis for the emergence of these concepts is given. The substantiation of the importance of philosophical research in the field of physics and mathematics, and quantum physics is given - in particular. The necessity of further research of the issue is postulated considering the latest concepts in natural science within the framework of binary geometrophysics of Yu.S. Vladimirov. In conclusion, the importance of the modal (or multimodular) nature of reality is argued for the construction of a new, comprehensive picture of the world, within which it would be possible, finally, to understand the essence of quantum processes that determine reality, and to reach a fundamentally new level of philosophy of natural science.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-154-160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is devoted to a brief analysis of the views of the German physicist in their comparison with the concept of the metaphysical foundations of the universe of modern physicists Alexei Vladimirovich and Lev Alekseevich Burov. The object of the study is the main philosophical work of Heisenberg - the treatise “The Order of Reality” - and the work of the Drillers called “Metaphysical Status of physical Laws”. The metaphysical concepts of the multimodular reality of the mentioned authors are compared, and a brief historical basis for the emergence of these concepts is given. The substantiation of the importance of philosophical research in the field of physics and mathematics, and quantum physics is given - in particular. The necessity of further research of the issue is postulated considering the latest concepts in natural science within the framework of binary geometrophysics of Yu.S. Vladimirov. In conclusion, the importance of the modal (or multimodular) nature of reality is argued for the construction of a new, comprehensive picture of the world, within which it would be possible, finally, to understand the essence of quantum processes that determine reality, and to reach a fundamentally new level of philosophy of natural science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海森堡的观点与多模概念的对应
本文将简要分析这位德国物理学家的观点与现代物理学家阿列克谢·弗拉基米罗维奇和列夫·阿列克谢耶维奇·布罗夫关于宇宙的形而上学基础的概念的比较。本研究的对象是海森堡的主要哲学著作《实在的秩序》和钻探者的著作《物理定律的形而上学地位》。对上述作者的多模实在的形而上学概念进行了比较,并给出了这些概念出现的简要历史基础。哲学研究在物理学和数学领域,特别是量子物理学领域的重要性得到了证实。结合自然科学的最新概念,在美国二元几何物理的框架下,提出了进一步研究这一问题的必要性。Vladimirov。总之,现实的模态(或多模态)本质的重要性被认为是为了构建一个新的、全面的世界图景,在这个图景中,最终有可能理解决定现实的量子过程的本质,并达到自然科学哲学的一个根本的新水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS
REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Idol Or Icon? Francisco Suárez And The Concept Of Being Art and Politics in Roger Scruton’s Conservative Philosophy by Ferenc HÖRCHER (review) Transcendental Phenomenology as Human Possibility: Husserl and Fink on the Phenomenologizing Subject by Denis DŽANIĆ (review) From Death to Life: Key Themes in Plato’s Phaedo by Franco TRABATTONI (review) Matter and Mathematics: An Essentialist Account of the Laws of Nature by Andrew YOUNAN (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1