A Modified Test Statistic for Maximum-Minimum Eigenvalue Detection Based on Asymptotic Distribution Thresholds

Darren R. Kartchner, S. Jayaweera
{"title":"A Modified Test Statistic for Maximum-Minimum Eigenvalue Detection Based on Asymptotic Distribution Thresholds","authors":"Darren R. Kartchner, S. Jayaweera","doi":"10.1109/MERCON.2018.8421979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ratio of the maximum and minimum eigenvalues of the sample covariance matrix has been suggested as a test statistic for signal detection in low-SNR regimes. The threshold required to implement a Neyman-Pearson test on this statistic is usually computed by estimating the distribution of this eigenvalue ratio under the null hypothesis using results from random matrix theory (RMT). However, in order to apply asymptotic laws from RMT, the data matrix used to construct the test statistic must have statistically independent columns, which was not satisfied by the test statistics used in previously proposed detectors. This paper forms a data matrix with independent columns to compute the test statistic for maximum-minimum eigenvalue (MME) detection and compares its performance to that of the test statistic as currently defined in literature. The comparison is made with both the semi-asymptotic threshold, which uses the limiting distribution of the maximum eigenvalue and the asymptotic constant to which the minimum eigenvalue converges; as well as the limiting distribution-based threshold, which uses the limiting distribution of the ratio of the maximum and minimum eigenvalues. Simulations compare the expected false alarm rate versus actual false alarm rate, as well as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for the following three cases: the two test statistics with the semi-asymptotic threshold, the two test statistics with the limiting distribution threshold, and the two thresholds in conjunction with the newly proposed test statistic. Results demonstrate that the newly proposed test statistic with the limiting distribution threshold is the only case where the actual false alarm rate remains consistently below the false alarm constraint set in the Neyman-Pearson test, while the previous test statistics are almost completely unresponsive to changes to the false alarm constraint.","PeriodicalId":6603,"journal":{"name":"2018 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)","volume":"11 1","pages":"25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MERCON.2018.8421979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The ratio of the maximum and minimum eigenvalues of the sample covariance matrix has been suggested as a test statistic for signal detection in low-SNR regimes. The threshold required to implement a Neyman-Pearson test on this statistic is usually computed by estimating the distribution of this eigenvalue ratio under the null hypothesis using results from random matrix theory (RMT). However, in order to apply asymptotic laws from RMT, the data matrix used to construct the test statistic must have statistically independent columns, which was not satisfied by the test statistics used in previously proposed detectors. This paper forms a data matrix with independent columns to compute the test statistic for maximum-minimum eigenvalue (MME) detection and compares its performance to that of the test statistic as currently defined in literature. The comparison is made with both the semi-asymptotic threshold, which uses the limiting distribution of the maximum eigenvalue and the asymptotic constant to which the minimum eigenvalue converges; as well as the limiting distribution-based threshold, which uses the limiting distribution of the ratio of the maximum and minimum eigenvalues. Simulations compare the expected false alarm rate versus actual false alarm rate, as well as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for the following three cases: the two test statistics with the semi-asymptotic threshold, the two test statistics with the limiting distribution threshold, and the two thresholds in conjunction with the newly proposed test statistic. Results demonstrate that the newly proposed test statistic with the limiting distribution threshold is the only case where the actual false alarm rate remains consistently below the false alarm constraint set in the Neyman-Pearson test, while the previous test statistics are almost completely unresponsive to changes to the false alarm constraint.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于渐近分布阈值的最大-最小特征值检测的改进检验统计量
样本协方差矩阵的最大和最小特征值之比已被建议作为低信噪比条件下信号检测的检验统计量。在此统计量上实现Neyman-Pearson检验所需的阈值通常是通过使用随机矩阵理论(RMT)的结果估计零假设下该特征值比率的分布来计算的。然而,为了应用RMT的渐近律,用于构造检验统计量的数据矩阵必须具有统计独立的列,这是先前提出的检测器中使用的检验统计量所不能满足的。本文构造了一个独立列的数据矩阵来计算最大最小特征值检测的检验统计量,并将其性能与目前文献中定义的检验统计量进行了比较。比较了利用最大特征值的极限分布的半渐近阈值和最小特征值收敛到的渐近常数;以及基于极限分布的阈值,它利用最大和最小特征值之比的极限分布。仿真比较了以下三种情况的期望虚警率与实际虚警率,以及接收机工作特征(ROC):两个检验统计量具有半渐近阈值,两个检验统计量具有极限分布阈值,两个阈值与新提出的检验统计量结合。结果表明,新提出的具有限制分布阈值的检验统计量是实际虚警率始终低于Neyman-Pearson检验中设置的虚警约束的唯一情况,而以前的检验统计量几乎完全不响应虚警约束的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fired-Siltstone Based Geopolymers for CO2 Sequestration Wells : A Study on the Effect of Curing Temperature Design and Development of a Smart Wheelchair with Multiple Control Interfaces Modelling Transfer Function of Power Transformers Using Sweep Frequency Response Analysis 3D Full-Field Deformation Measuring Technique with Optics-Based Measurements Optimization of Thermal Comfort in Sri Lankan Residential Buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1