Setting Social Status in Couples and Partners' Budgetary Discretion in Central European Countries

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.13060/00380288.2020.55.6.492
J. Večerník, Martina Mysíková
{"title":"Setting Social Status in Couples and Partners' Budgetary Discretion in Central European Countries","authors":"J. Večerník, Martina Mysíková","doi":"10.13060/00380288.2020.55.6.492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional optics of social stratification research—in which the social position of the family unit is seen as being determined by the status of the male head of the household—have been challenged since the early 1970s. Similarly, economic research which views the household as a single unit has been questioned. Changing family circumstances and the increased share of couples in which the woman has higher earnings, education, and socioeconomic status mean that both these perspectives needs reformulating. The authors illustrate these issues using the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions survey (EU-SILC) for five Central European countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Austria) and draw on its 2006–2016 time series to present the characteristics of partners in couples and the relations between them. Female primacy has increased either in earnings, education, or socio-economic category in all countries except Hungary. The authors use the EU-SILC 2010 ‘Module on Intra-household Sharing of Resources’ to test the hypothesis that a direct link exists between partners’ social status split and separate welfare status, where female primacy in relevant characteristics is taken as a proxy for social status split, while separate welfare status is indicated by partners’ budgetary discretion. The hypothesis is confirmed for Austria, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia, but not for Hungary and Poland. Apart from the personal factors of social status split, two family factors are strongly related to the probability of the budgetary discretion of couple partners across all countries: household income and marital status.","PeriodicalId":45665,"journal":{"name":"Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"791-820"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2020.55.6.492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The conventional optics of social stratification research—in which the social position of the family unit is seen as being determined by the status of the male head of the household—have been challenged since the early 1970s. Similarly, economic research which views the household as a single unit has been questioned. Changing family circumstances and the increased share of couples in which the woman has higher earnings, education, and socioeconomic status mean that both these perspectives needs reformulating. The authors illustrate these issues using the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions survey (EU-SILC) for five Central European countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Austria) and draw on its 2006–2016 time series to present the characteristics of partners in couples and the relations between them. Female primacy has increased either in earnings, education, or socio-economic category in all countries except Hungary. The authors use the EU-SILC 2010 ‘Module on Intra-household Sharing of Resources’ to test the hypothesis that a direct link exists between partners’ social status split and separate welfare status, where female primacy in relevant characteristics is taken as a proxy for social status split, while separate welfare status is indicated by partners’ budgetary discretion. The hypothesis is confirmed for Austria, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia, but not for Hungary and Poland. Apart from the personal factors of social status split, two family factors are strongly related to the probability of the budgetary discretion of couple partners across all countries: household income and marital status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中欧国家夫妻社会地位设置与伴侣预算自由裁量权
自20世纪70年代初以来,社会分层研究的传统观点——家庭单位的社会地位被视为由男性户主的地位决定——受到了挑战。同样,将家庭视为单一单位的经济研究也受到了质疑。不断变化的家庭环境,以及女性收入更高、受教育程度更高、社会经济地位更高的夫妇比例的增加,意味着这两种观点都需要重新表述。作者利用欧盟对五个中欧国家(捷克共和国、匈牙利、波兰、斯洛伐克和奥地利)的收入和生活条件统计调查(EU-SILC)来说明这些问题,并利用其2006-2016年的时间序列来展示夫妻伴侣的特征以及他们之间的关系。在除匈牙利以外的所有国家,女性在收入、教育或社会经济类别中的主导地位都有所提高。作者使用EU-SILC 2010年“家庭内部资源共享模块”来检验伴侣的社会地位分裂和单独福利状态之间存在直接联系的假设,其中女性在相关特征中的首要地位被视为社会地位分裂的代理,而单独福利状态由伴侣的预算自由决定。这一假设在奥地利、捷克共和国和斯洛伐克得到了证实,但在匈牙利和波兰没有得到证实。除了社会地位分裂的个人因素外,两个家庭因素与所有国家的伴侣预算自由裁量权的可能性密切相关:家庭收入和婚姻状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Sociologický časopis je recenzovaný vědecký časopis publikující původní příspěvky k poznání společnosti od českých i zahraničních autorů. Vychází od roku 1965. Časopis přináší stati zabývající se otázkami teoretické sociologie, články zkoumající transformační jevy a sociální procesy probíhající v postkomunistických společnostech, přehledové články zpracovávající vývoj v široké paletě oborů sociologie a příbuzných sociálních věd, informace ze sociologických výzkumů.
期刊最新文献
Petr Gibas a kol.: Bydlení mladých v době krize Michal Kaplánek (ed.): Volný čas dětí staršího školního věku Martin Potůček: Anatomie komunismu: Skutečný příběh jedné rodiny Between Politicisation and Depoliticisation: Restitution of Church Property in Czech Republic What Is Early Childhood Education and Care For? How ECEC for Children up to the Age of Three Is (Not) Discussed in the Czech Republic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1