Automated measurements of fish within a trawl using stereo images from a Camera-Trawl device (CamTrawl)

Kresimir Williams , Nathan Lauffenburger , Meng-Che Chuang , Jenq-Neng Hwang , Rick Towler
{"title":"Automated measurements of fish within a trawl using stereo images from a Camera-Trawl device (CamTrawl)","authors":"Kresimir Williams ,&nbsp;Nathan Lauffenburger ,&nbsp;Meng-Che Chuang ,&nbsp;Jenq-Neng Hwang ,&nbsp;Rick Towler","doi":"10.1016/j.mio.2016.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>We present a method to automatically measure fish from images taken using a stereo-camera system installed in a large trawl (CamTrawl). Different visibility and fish density conditions were evaluated to establish accuracy and precision of image-based length estimates when compared with physical length measurements. The automated image-based length estimates compared well with the trawl catch values and were comparable with manual image processing in good visibility conditions. Greatest agreement with trawl catch occurred when fish were within </span><span><math><mn>2</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow></msup></math></span><span> of fully lateral presentation to the cameras, and within 150 cm of the cameras. High turbidity<span> caused substantial over- and underestimates of length composition, and a greater number of incompletely extracted fish outlines. Multiple estimates of individual fish lengths showed a mean coefficient of variation (CV) of 3% in good visibility conditions. The agreement between manual and automated fish measurement estimates was not correlated with fish length or range from the camera (</span></span><span><math><msup><mrow><mstyle><mi>r</mi></mstyle></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mtext>–</mtext><mn>0.08</mn></math></span>). Implementation of these methods can result in a large increase in survey efficiency, given the effort required to process the trawl catch.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100922,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Oceanography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mio.2016.09.008","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211122016300251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

We present a method to automatically measure fish from images taken using a stereo-camera system installed in a large trawl (CamTrawl). Different visibility and fish density conditions were evaluated to establish accuracy and precision of image-based length estimates when compared with physical length measurements. The automated image-based length estimates compared well with the trawl catch values and were comparable with manual image processing in good visibility conditions. Greatest agreement with trawl catch occurred when fish were within 20 of fully lateral presentation to the cameras, and within 150 cm of the cameras. High turbidity caused substantial over- and underestimates of length composition, and a greater number of incompletely extracted fish outlines. Multiple estimates of individual fish lengths showed a mean coefficient of variation (CV) of 3% in good visibility conditions. The agreement between manual and automated fish measurement estimates was not correlated with fish length or range from the camera (r2=00.08). Implementation of these methods can result in a large increase in survey efficiency, given the effort required to process the trawl catch.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用摄像机-拖网设备的立体图像自动测量拖网内的鱼类(CamTrawl)
我们提出了一种使用安装在大型拖网(CamTrawl)上的立体摄像系统从图像中自动测量鱼类的方法。评估了不同的能见度和鱼密度条件,以确定基于图像的长度估计的准确性和精度,并与物理长度测量相比较。基于图像的自动长度估计值与拖网捕获值比较好,并且在良好的能见度条件下与手动图像处理相当。与拖网捕捞最一致的情况是,当鱼在摄影机完全侧向呈现的20°范围内,并在摄影机150厘米范围内。高浊度导致大量的长度组成高估和低估,以及大量不完全提取的鱼轮廓。在良好的能见度条件下,对单鱼长度的多次估计表明,平均变异系数(CV)为3%。人工和自动鱼类测量估计值之间的一致性与鱼类长度或距离相机无关(r2= 0-0.08)。考虑到处理拖网渔获物所需要的努力,实施这些方法可以大大提高调查效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Final issue of Methods in Oceanography Measuring pH in the Arctic Ocean: Colorimetric method or SeaFET? A topological approach for quantitative comparisons of ocean model fields to satellite ocean color data Optical methods for estimating apparent density of sediment in suspension
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1