Is the sexual sensation seeking scale a reliable instrument? addressing multiple factor structures in a Colombian sample

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Sexuality Pub Date : 2023-01-24 DOI:10.1080/19419899.2023.2169192
D. Romero, David L. Rodrigues, Moisés Mebarak, Juan C. Tovar-Castro, A. Millán
{"title":"Is the sexual sensation seeking scale a reliable instrument? addressing multiple factor structures in a Colombian sample","authors":"D. Romero, David L. Rodrigues, Moisés Mebarak, Juan C. Tovar-Castro, A. Millán","doi":"10.1080/19419899.2023.2169192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The sexual sensation seeking scale (SSSS) is a widely used instrument to measure individuals’ tendency to seek an optimal level of sexual arousal and novel sexual experiences. However, psychometric studies have suggested different factor structures for this instrument, which may lead to a biased assessment of the subdimensions of sexual sensation seeking. The present study (N = 812) aimed to identify the best factorial model of the SSSS by comparing the model suggested by previous research. Results from Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses showed that none of the models tested have sufficient goodness-of-fit to support the internal validity of the instrument. Thus, this study highlights the limitations of the SSSS in assessing sexual sensation seeking and proposes psychometric alternatives that should be considered by researchers to achieve a reliable measure of sexual sensation seeking.","PeriodicalId":51686,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Sexuality","volume":"50 1","pages":"445 - 452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2023.2169192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The sexual sensation seeking scale (SSSS) is a widely used instrument to measure individuals’ tendency to seek an optimal level of sexual arousal and novel sexual experiences. However, psychometric studies have suggested different factor structures for this instrument, which may lead to a biased assessment of the subdimensions of sexual sensation seeking. The present study (N = 812) aimed to identify the best factorial model of the SSSS by comparing the model suggested by previous research. Results from Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses showed that none of the models tested have sufficient goodness-of-fit to support the internal validity of the instrument. Thus, this study highlights the limitations of the SSSS in assessing sexual sensation seeking and proposes psychometric alternatives that should be considered by researchers to achieve a reliable measure of sexual sensation seeking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性感觉寻求量表是一个可靠的工具吗?解决哥伦比亚样本中的多因素结构
性感觉寻求量表(SSSS)是一种被广泛使用的工具,用于衡量个体寻求最佳性唤起水平和新奇性体验的倾向。然而,心理测量学研究表明,这一工具的因素结构不同,这可能导致对性感觉寻求子维度的评估有偏见。本研究(N = 812)旨在通过比较以往研究提出的模型,找出SSSS的最佳析因模型。探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析的结果表明,所测试的模型都没有足够的拟合优度来支持该工具的内部有效性。因此,本研究强调了SSSS在评估性感觉寻求方面的局限性,并提出了研究人员应该考虑的心理测量替代方案,以实现对性感觉寻求的可靠测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology & Sexuality
Psychology & Sexuality PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
The role of faith in the experience of grief among sexually diverse individuals: a systematic review Do attitude functions and perceiver demographics predict attitudes towards asexuality? Holding hands: LGBTQ people’s experiences of public displays of affection with their partner(s) Changing beliefs about gender: the relation between contact with gender nonconforming individuals and gender essentialism Functional, communicative, and hybrid barriers to accessing mental health care in LGBTQ+ communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1