ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS OF INTERVENTIONS FOR TRANSTIBIAL AMPUTEES: A SCOPING REVIEW OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES.

IF 0.7 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Technology and Innovation Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI:10.21300/18.2-3.2016.85
M. J. Highsmith, Jason T. Kahle, Amanda L. Lewandowski, Tyler D. Klenow, John J Orriola, Rebecca M Miro, O. Hill, Sylvia Ursula Raschke, M. Orendurff, James T. Highsmith, Bryce Sutton
{"title":"ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS OF INTERVENTIONS FOR TRANSTIBIAL AMPUTEES: A SCOPING REVIEW OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES.","authors":"M. J. Highsmith, Jason T. Kahle, Amanda L. Lewandowski, Tyler D. Klenow, John J Orriola, Rebecca M Miro, O. Hill, Sylvia Ursula Raschke, M. Orendurff, James T. Highsmith, Bryce Sutton","doi":"10.21300/18.2-3.2016.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transtibial amputation (TTA) is life-altering emotionally, functionally, and economically. The economic impact to all stakeholders is largely unknown, as is the cost-effectiveness of prosthetic intervention. This scoping report's purpose was to determine if there is sufficient evidence to conduct a formal systematic review or meta-analysis in any particular prosthetic intervention area and to determine if any evidence statements could be synthesized relative to economic evaluation of interventions provided to patients with TTA. The scoping review revealed six articles representing three topical areas of transtibial care: Care Models, Prosthetic Treatment, and Prosthetic Sockets. All six articles were cost-identification or cost-consequence design and included a total of 704 subjects. Presently, it can be concluded with moderate confidence that specific weight-bearing and total-contact sockets for transtibial amputees are functionally and economically equivalent in the short term when costs, delivery time, and all stakeholder perspectives are considered. Long-term socket outcomes are relatively unexplored. Further primary research is needed beyond this to determine cost-effectiveness for other areas of transtibial prosthetic care although clinical outcomes are somewhat established through systematic review and meta-analysis in other areas of care. Conversely, evaluation of narrative economic reports relative to transtibial care may be sufficient to warrant further analysis. Guidance from the profession may also be useful in devising a strategy for how to assure economic analyses are a routine element of future prosthetic science.","PeriodicalId":44009,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Innovation","volume":"90 1","pages":"85-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21300/18.2-3.2016.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transtibial amputation (TTA) is life-altering emotionally, functionally, and economically. The economic impact to all stakeholders is largely unknown, as is the cost-effectiveness of prosthetic intervention. This scoping report's purpose was to determine if there is sufficient evidence to conduct a formal systematic review or meta-analysis in any particular prosthetic intervention area and to determine if any evidence statements could be synthesized relative to economic evaluation of interventions provided to patients with TTA. The scoping review revealed six articles representing three topical areas of transtibial care: Care Models, Prosthetic Treatment, and Prosthetic Sockets. All six articles were cost-identification or cost-consequence design and included a total of 704 subjects. Presently, it can be concluded with moderate confidence that specific weight-bearing and total-contact sockets for transtibial amputees are functionally and economically equivalent in the short term when costs, delivery time, and all stakeholder perspectives are considered. Long-term socket outcomes are relatively unexplored. Further primary research is needed beyond this to determine cost-effectiveness for other areas of transtibial prosthetic care although clinical outcomes are somewhat established through systematic review and meta-analysis in other areas of care. Conversely, evaluation of narrative economic reports relative to transtibial care may be sufficient to warrant further analysis. Guidance from the profession may also be useful in devising a strategy for how to assure economic analyses are a routine element of future prosthetic science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨胫截肢者干预措施的经济评估:比较研究的范围回顾。
胫骨截肢(TTA)在情感上、功能上和经济上都能改变生活。对所有利益相关者的经济影响在很大程度上是未知的,假肢干预的成本效益也是未知的。本范围界定报告的目的是确定是否有足够的证据在任何特定的假肢干预领域进行正式的系统评价或荟萃分析,并确定是否可以合成任何与向TTA患者提供的干预措施的经济评估相关的证据陈述。范围审查显示了六篇文章,代表了三个主题领域的胫骨护理:护理模式,假体治疗和假体窝。所有6篇文章均采用成本识别或成本后果设计,共纳入704名受试者。目前,考虑到成本、交付时间和所有利益相关者的观点,我们可以适度肯定地得出结论:短期内,用于经胫骨截肢者的特定负重和全接触套在功能和经济上是相当的。相对而言,长期的治疗效果尚未得到探索。尽管临床结果在一定程度上是通过其他领域的系统回顾和荟萃分析确定的,但需要进一步的初步研究来确定其他领域的跨胫假体护理的成本效益。相反,对与跨骨护理相关的叙述性经济报告的评价可能足以保证进一步的分析。来自专业人士的指导也可能有助于制定策略,以确保经济分析成为未来假肢科学的常规元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Innovation
Technology and Innovation MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
VA TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM RESPONDS TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ASSISTANCE PROJECT BRINGS VA HEALTH CARE IDEAS TO LIFE. On Capital, Innovation, and Government Innovative Infrared Heating Technologies for Food and Agricultural Processing Journeys of Innovation: Positively Connected
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1