Application of GNSS derived precipitable water vapour prediction in West Africa

IF 0.9 Q4 REMOTE SENSING Journal of Geodetic Science Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1515/jogs-2019-0005
Akwasi Acheampong, K. Obeng
{"title":"Application of GNSS derived precipitable water vapour prediction in West Africa","authors":"Akwasi Acheampong, K. Obeng","doi":"10.1515/jogs-2019-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Atmospheric water vapour, a major component in weather systems serves as the main source for precipitation, provides latent heat which helps maintain the earth’s energy balance and a major parameter in Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. An observational technique based on the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) has made it possible to easily retrieve Precipitable Water (PW) at station’s antenna position with very high spatial and temporal variabilities. GNSS techniques are superior to ground-based and balloons sensors in terms of accuracy, ease of use, wider coverage and easier assimilation into NWP models. This study sought to use prediction models using daily observational data from Four (4) International GNSS Service stations in West Africa. The best prediction model can be used in cases of station outages and to predict PW over data poor regions using computed Zenith Tropospheric Delays (ZTD). gLAB software was used to process the stations’ data in Precise Point Positioning mode and PW were retrieved using station’s temperature and pressure values. Computed PW were compared against Total Column Water Vapour from ERA-Interim Reanalysis data in 2016. Correlation coefficient (R2) values ranging from 0.947 — 0.995 were obtained for the four stations. With computed PW’s, three regression models were tested to find the best-fit with PW as the dependent variable and ZTD being the independent variable. The quadratic model gave the highest R2 and lowest RMSE values as against the linear and exponential models. Time series forecasts models such as moving average, autoregressive, exponential smoothing and autoregressive integrated moving average were also employed. The forecasts results were compared against ZTD with autoregressive model reporting the highest R2 and lowest RMSE amongst the forecast models developed.","PeriodicalId":44569,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodetic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodetic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2019-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Atmospheric water vapour, a major component in weather systems serves as the main source for precipitation, provides latent heat which helps maintain the earth’s energy balance and a major parameter in Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. An observational technique based on the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) has made it possible to easily retrieve Precipitable Water (PW) at station’s antenna position with very high spatial and temporal variabilities. GNSS techniques are superior to ground-based and balloons sensors in terms of accuracy, ease of use, wider coverage and easier assimilation into NWP models. This study sought to use prediction models using daily observational data from Four (4) International GNSS Service stations in West Africa. The best prediction model can be used in cases of station outages and to predict PW over data poor regions using computed Zenith Tropospheric Delays (ZTD). gLAB software was used to process the stations’ data in Precise Point Positioning mode and PW were retrieved using station’s temperature and pressure values. Computed PW were compared against Total Column Water Vapour from ERA-Interim Reanalysis data in 2016. Correlation coefficient (R2) values ranging from 0.947 — 0.995 were obtained for the four stations. With computed PW’s, three regression models were tested to find the best-fit with PW as the dependent variable and ZTD being the independent variable. The quadratic model gave the highest R2 and lowest RMSE values as against the linear and exponential models. Time series forecasts models such as moving average, autoregressive, exponential smoothing and autoregressive integrated moving average were also employed. The forecasts results were compared against ZTD with autoregressive model reporting the highest R2 and lowest RMSE amongst the forecast models developed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GNSS衍生水汽预报在西非的应用
摘要大气水汽是天气系统的主要组成部分,是降水的主要来源,提供的潜热有助于维持地球能量平衡,是数值天气预报(NWP)模式的主要参数。一种基于全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)的观测技术使得在空间和时间变化非常大的台站天线位置轻松地检索可降水量(PW)成为可能。GNSS技术在精度、易用性、更广泛的覆盖范围和更容易同化到NWP模型方面优于地面和气球传感器。本研究试图利用西非四(4)个国际GNSS服务站的每日观测数据使用预测模型。最好的预测模型可以用于站点中断的情况,并使用计算的天顶对流层延迟(ZTD)来预测数据贫乏地区的PW。采用gLAB软件以精确点定位方式对各站点的数据进行处理,利用各站点的温度和压力值反演PW。将计算的PW与2016年ERA-Interim Reanalysis数据中的总水柱水蒸气进行了比较。相关系数(R2)在0.947 ~ 0.995之间。通过计算PW,以PW为因变量,ZTD为自变量,对三种回归模型进行检验,找出最适合的模型。与线性和指数模型相比,二次模型给出了最高的R2和最低的RMSE值。采用了移动平均、自回归、指数平滑和自回归综合移动平均等时间序列预测模型。将预测结果与ZTD进行比较,自回归模型报告了所开发的预测模型中最高的R2和最低的RMSE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodetic Science
Journal of Geodetic Science REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
3
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Displacement analysis of the October 30, 2020 (M w = 6.9), Samos (Aegean Sea) earthquake A field test of compact active transponders for InSAR geodesy Estimating the slip rate in the North Tabriz Fault using focal mechanism data and GPS velocity field Simulating VLBI observations to BeiDou and Galileo satellites in L-band for frame ties On initial data in adjustments of the geometric levelling networks (on the mean of paired observations)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1