Enhanced Experimental Carbon Dioxide Sweep Using Surface Coated Silica Nanoparticles as a Foaming Agent

Ahmad Alfakher, D. DiCarlo
{"title":"Enhanced Experimental Carbon Dioxide Sweep Using Surface Coated Silica Nanoparticles as a Foaming Agent","authors":"Ahmad Alfakher, D. DiCarlo","doi":"10.2118/206278-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Solvent flooding is a well-established method of enhanced oil recovery (EOR), with carbon dioxide (CO2) being the most-often used solvent. As CO2 is both less viscous and less dense than the fluids it displaces, the displacement suffers from poor sweep efficiency caused by an unfavorable mobility ratio and unfavorable gravity number. Creating in-situ CO2 foam improves the sweep efficiency of CO2 floods. Another application is the injection of CO2 foam into saline aquifers for carbon capture and storage (CCS).\n The goal of the core flood experiments in this paper was to study the effectiveness of surface coated silica nanoparticles as an in-situ CO2 foaming agent. In each experiment, the pressure drop was measured across five separate sections in the core, as well as along the whole core. In addition, the saturation distribution in the core was calculated periodically using computed tomography (CT) scanning measurements. The experiments consisted of vertical core floods where liquid CO2 displaced brine from the top to the bottom of the core. A flood with surface coated silica nanoparticles suspended in the brine is performed in the same core and at the same conditions to a flood with no nanoparticles, and results from these floods are compared. In these experiments, breakthrough occurred 45% later with foamed CO2, and the final CO2 saturation was also 45% greater than with the unfoamed CO2.\n The study shows how nanoparticles stabilize the CO2 front. The results provide quantitative information on, as well as a graphical representation of, the behavior of the CO2 foam front as it advances through the core. This data can be used to upscale the behavior observed and properties calculated from the core-scale to the reservoir-scale to improve field applications of CO2 flooding.","PeriodicalId":10928,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","volume":"37 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206278-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solvent flooding is a well-established method of enhanced oil recovery (EOR), with carbon dioxide (CO2) being the most-often used solvent. As CO2 is both less viscous and less dense than the fluids it displaces, the displacement suffers from poor sweep efficiency caused by an unfavorable mobility ratio and unfavorable gravity number. Creating in-situ CO2 foam improves the sweep efficiency of CO2 floods. Another application is the injection of CO2 foam into saline aquifers for carbon capture and storage (CCS). The goal of the core flood experiments in this paper was to study the effectiveness of surface coated silica nanoparticles as an in-situ CO2 foaming agent. In each experiment, the pressure drop was measured across five separate sections in the core, as well as along the whole core. In addition, the saturation distribution in the core was calculated periodically using computed tomography (CT) scanning measurements. The experiments consisted of vertical core floods where liquid CO2 displaced brine from the top to the bottom of the core. A flood with surface coated silica nanoparticles suspended in the brine is performed in the same core and at the same conditions to a flood with no nanoparticles, and results from these floods are compared. In these experiments, breakthrough occurred 45% later with foamed CO2, and the final CO2 saturation was also 45% greater than with the unfoamed CO2. The study shows how nanoparticles stabilize the CO2 front. The results provide quantitative information on, as well as a graphical representation of, the behavior of the CO2 foam front as it advances through the core. This data can be used to upscale the behavior observed and properties calculated from the core-scale to the reservoir-scale to improve field applications of CO2 flooding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用表面包覆二氧化硅纳米颗粒作为发泡剂增强二氧化碳扫描实验
溶剂驱是一种成熟的提高采收率(EOR)的方法,其中二氧化碳(CO2)是最常用的溶剂。由于CO2的黏度和密度都低于被驱替的流体,因此由于流动性比和重力数的不利,驱替的波及效率很低。原位生成CO2泡沫可以提高CO2驱油的波及效率。另一个应用是将二氧化碳泡沫注入含盐含水层,用于碳捕获和储存(CCS)。岩心驱油实验的目的是研究表面包覆二氧化硅纳米颗粒作为原位CO2发泡剂的有效性。在每次实验中,压降都是在堆芯的五个独立部分以及整个堆芯上测量的。此外,利用计算机断层扫描(CT)测量周期性地计算岩心的饱和度分布。实验包括垂直岩心洪水,液态二氧化碳取代了岩心顶部到底部的盐水。在相同的岩心和相同的条件下,在盐水中悬浮表面包覆二氧化硅纳米颗粒的驱油方法与不含纳米颗粒的驱油方法进行了比较。在这些实验中,发泡CO2的突破时间比未发泡CO2晚45%,最终的CO2饱和度也比未发泡CO2高45%。这项研究展示了纳米粒子是如何稳定二氧化碳前沿的。结果提供了定量信息,以及图形表示,二氧化碳泡沫前沿的行为,因为它通过核心推进。这些数据可用于将观察到的行为和计算的性质从岩心尺度提升到储层尺度,以改善CO2驱油的现场应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of Wettability Alteration from Alkali/Nanoparticles/Polymer Flooding - Integrating Data of Imbibition, Contact Angle and Interfacial-Tension to Screen Injection Agents Benchmarking and Field-Testing of the Distributed Quasi-Newton Derivative-Free Optimization Method for Field Development Optimization Aplicability of an Innovative and Light Seismic Approach to Monitor SAGD Operations in Surmont: A Blind Test Four Simple Questions: Decision-Centered Risk and Project Management Gas Migration in Wellbores During Pressurized Mud Cap Drilling PMCD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1