Migration policy implementation and its politics in South Africa

T. Adetiba
{"title":"Migration policy implementation and its politics in South Africa","authors":"T. Adetiba","doi":"10.21303/2504-5571.2022.002383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, migration is to a certain degree an important and highly debated political topic among scholars because of its peculiarity to human movement and relationship between states. Migration is fundamental to liberal democracies and a function of the international system of states. Following the demise of the apartheid system and the adoption of inclusive governance in South Africa in 1994, the country has continued to witness an influx of migrants. However, the call for the deportation and rejection of migrants amongst South Africans has continued to increase with black foreign nationals at the receiving end, sometimes openly or clandestinely done by government officials. Using a qualitative research method, underpinned by the following questions (i) Is South Africa playing politics with its migration policies, while surreptitiously legalizing xenophobism? (ii) Can well-managed migration policies allay the fears of foreign nationals, particularly the blacks in South Africa? (iii) What effects would anti-immigrants’ laws and attitudes have on South Africa’s relations with other [African] countries? The paper argued that South Africa’s preoccupation with restrictionism policies, driven by xenophobism and political interest, seems to have compromised inroads for immigrants that are very important to its economic growth, concluding that unless the rhetoric of a perceived socio-economic threat, posed by migrants, is countered effectively, South Africa’s economies stand to lose out substantially from the implementation of anti-immigration policies.","PeriodicalId":33606,"journal":{"name":"EUREKA Social and Humanities","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUREKA Social and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2022.002383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, migration is to a certain degree an important and highly debated political topic among scholars because of its peculiarity to human movement and relationship between states. Migration is fundamental to liberal democracies and a function of the international system of states. Following the demise of the apartheid system and the adoption of inclusive governance in South Africa in 1994, the country has continued to witness an influx of migrants. However, the call for the deportation and rejection of migrants amongst South Africans has continued to increase with black foreign nationals at the receiving end, sometimes openly or clandestinely done by government officials. Using a qualitative research method, underpinned by the following questions (i) Is South Africa playing politics with its migration policies, while surreptitiously legalizing xenophobism? (ii) Can well-managed migration policies allay the fears of foreign nationals, particularly the blacks in South Africa? (iii) What effects would anti-immigrants’ laws and attitudes have on South Africa’s relations with other [African] countries? The paper argued that South Africa’s preoccupation with restrictionism policies, driven by xenophobism and political interest, seems to have compromised inroads for immigrants that are very important to its economic growth, concluding that unless the rhetoric of a perceived socio-economic threat, posed by migrants, is countered effectively, South Africa’s economies stand to lose out substantially from the implementation of anti-immigration policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非移民政策的实施及其政治
在全球范围内,由于人口流动和国家间关系的特殊性,移民在一定程度上是一个重要的、备受学者争论的政治话题。移民是自由民主的基础,也是国际国家体系的一个功能。在1994年南非种族隔离制度消亡和实行包容性治理之后,移民继续涌入该国。然而,南非人要求驱逐和拒绝移徙者的呼声继续增加,接收移徙者是黑人外国国民,有时是政府官员公开或秘密进行的。采用定性研究方法,以下列问题为基础:(i)南非是否在其移徙政策上玩弄政治,同时暗中使仇外心理合法化?管理良好的移徙政策能否减轻外国国民,特别是南非黑人的恐惧?反移民的法律和态度会对南非与其他[非洲]国家的关系产生什么影响?该论文认为,在仇外心理和政治利益的驱动下,南非对限制主义政策的关注似乎损害了对其经济增长非常重要的移民的进展,结论是,除非移民所构成的社会经济威胁的言论得到有效反击,否则南非的经济将从反移民政策的实施中蒙受重大损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Risky sexual behavior and associated factors among in-school adolescents: a school-based, cross-sectional study Experiencing work in the fourth industrial revolution: a qualitative study on work identity and new ways of work Epistemological access: a case of academic development programmes at a university of technology Virtual small business entrepreneurship opportunities Internationalisation of higher education in the new normal in universities: university management perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1