Evaluation of interrelationships between thyroid function, autoimmunity, insulin resistance and lipid profile in Graves' disease

Pub Date : 2017-05-03 DOI:10.1530/endoabs.49.EP1289
António Carujo, Celestino Neves, Neves Joao Sergio, Oliveira Sofia Castro, O. Sokhatska, C. Esteves, Miguel Pereira, M. Luis, L. Delgado, D. Carvalho
{"title":"Evaluation of interrelationships between thyroid function, autoimmunity, insulin resistance and lipid profile in Graves' disease","authors":"António Carujo, Celestino Neves, Neves Joao Sergio, Oliveira Sofia Castro, O. Sokhatska, C. Esteves, Miguel Pereira, M. Luis, L. Delgado, D. Carvalho","doi":"10.1530/endoabs.49.EP1289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Thyroid hormones modulate the lipoprotein and glucose metabolisms. In hyperthyroidism, insulin resistance is a frequent finding. The aim of our study was to assess the interrelationships between thyroid function, autoimmunity, lipid profile, glucose metabolism and other cardiovascular risk factors in patients with Graves’ disease. \nMaterial & Methods: We recorded free T3, free T4, TSH, TSH receptor antibodies, parameters of the lipid profile, glucose metabolism (including insulin resistance markers like homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance - HOMA-IR), C reactive protein and homocysteine in 126 patients with Graves’ disease in the first cycle of treatment with methimazole (92.9% females, mean age 44.9 ± 15.2 years). Patients were divided in subgroups according to: TSH receptor antibodies [positive (n = 57) or negative (n = 69)] and thyroid function [euthyroidism (n = 74), subclinical (n = 29) or clinical hyperthyroidism (n = 22)]. Spearman correlations, t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests were performed for statistical analysis. \nResults: Comparing the positive and negative TSH receptor antibodies groups, significantly lower apolipoprotein B (80.3 ± 23.9 vs 89.7 ± 23.8 mg/dL; p = 0.047) and TSH [0.180 (0.002-1.080) vs 1.020 (0.235-2.055) μUI/mL; p < 0.001] were found in the positive TSH receptor antibodies group. Comparing with the normal thyroid function group, patients in the clinical hyperthyroid group presented significantly lower apolipoprotein B (70.9 ± 25.8 vs 89.8 ± 24.0 mg/dL; p = 0.007] and higher fasting glucose (96.0 ± 24.4 vs 86.4 ± 10.0 mg/dL; p = 0.019), insulin [10.4 (6.2-15.8) vs 7.5 (4.8-9.7) μUI/mL; p = 0.021], HOMA-IR [2.09 (1.29-4.53) vs 1.55 (0.96-2.13); p = 0.023] and C reactive protein [0.57 (0.20-0.93) vs 0.20 (0.07-0.38) mg/L; p = 0.005]. No significant differences were found between the subclinical hyperthyroid and the normal groups. There was a negative correlation between TSH and the TSH receptor antibodies (r = -0.386; p < 0.001). Apolipoprotein B was positively correlated with TSH (r = 0.236; p = 0.016), and negatively with the TSH receptor antibodies (r = -0.211; p = 0.030). Both free T3 and free T4 were positively correlated with fasting insulin (r = 0.268; p = 0.008 and r = 0.226; p = 0.025, respectively) and HOMA-IR (r = 0.258; p = 0.010 and r = 0.259; p = 0.010, respectively). Free T4 was also positively correlated with fasting glucose (r = 0.269; p = 0.008). \nConclusion: In patients with Graves’ disease, the interrelationships between thyroid function, autoimmunity, insulin resistance and lipid profile may contribute to the increased cardiovascular risk. The lipid profile suggests a hypolipidemic effect.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/endoabs.49.EP1289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Thyroid hormones modulate the lipoprotein and glucose metabolisms. In hyperthyroidism, insulin resistance is a frequent finding. The aim of our study was to assess the interrelationships between thyroid function, autoimmunity, lipid profile, glucose metabolism and other cardiovascular risk factors in patients with Graves’ disease. Material & Methods: We recorded free T3, free T4, TSH, TSH receptor antibodies, parameters of the lipid profile, glucose metabolism (including insulin resistance markers like homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance - HOMA-IR), C reactive protein and homocysteine in 126 patients with Graves’ disease in the first cycle of treatment with methimazole (92.9% females, mean age 44.9 ± 15.2 years). Patients were divided in subgroups according to: TSH receptor antibodies [positive (n = 57) or negative (n = 69)] and thyroid function [euthyroidism (n = 74), subclinical (n = 29) or clinical hyperthyroidism (n = 22)]. Spearman correlations, t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests were performed for statistical analysis. Results: Comparing the positive and negative TSH receptor antibodies groups, significantly lower apolipoprotein B (80.3 ± 23.9 vs 89.7 ± 23.8 mg/dL; p = 0.047) and TSH [0.180 (0.002-1.080) vs 1.020 (0.235-2.055) μUI/mL; p < 0.001] were found in the positive TSH receptor antibodies group. Comparing with the normal thyroid function group, patients in the clinical hyperthyroid group presented significantly lower apolipoprotein B (70.9 ± 25.8 vs 89.8 ± 24.0 mg/dL; p = 0.007] and higher fasting glucose (96.0 ± 24.4 vs 86.4 ± 10.0 mg/dL; p = 0.019), insulin [10.4 (6.2-15.8) vs 7.5 (4.8-9.7) μUI/mL; p = 0.021], HOMA-IR [2.09 (1.29-4.53) vs 1.55 (0.96-2.13); p = 0.023] and C reactive protein [0.57 (0.20-0.93) vs 0.20 (0.07-0.38) mg/L; p = 0.005]. No significant differences were found between the subclinical hyperthyroid and the normal groups. There was a negative correlation between TSH and the TSH receptor antibodies (r = -0.386; p < 0.001). Apolipoprotein B was positively correlated with TSH (r = 0.236; p = 0.016), and negatively with the TSH receptor antibodies (r = -0.211; p = 0.030). Both free T3 and free T4 were positively correlated with fasting insulin (r = 0.268; p = 0.008 and r = 0.226; p = 0.025, respectively) and HOMA-IR (r = 0.258; p = 0.010 and r = 0.259; p = 0.010, respectively). Free T4 was also positively correlated with fasting glucose (r = 0.269; p = 0.008). Conclusion: In patients with Graves’ disease, the interrelationships between thyroid function, autoimmunity, insulin resistance and lipid profile may contribute to the increased cardiovascular risk. The lipid profile suggests a hypolipidemic effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Graves病患者甲状腺功能、自身免疫、胰岛素抵抗和血脂的相互关系评价
简介:甲状腺激素调节脂蛋白和葡萄糖代谢。在甲亢中,胰岛素抵抗是一个常见的发现。本研究的目的是评估Graves病患者甲状腺功能、自身免疫、血脂、糖代谢和其他心血管危险因素之间的相互关系。材料与方法:我们记录了126例Graves病患者在甲巯唑治疗第一周期的游离T3、游离T4、TSH、TSH受体抗体、血脂参数、葡萄糖代谢(包括胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估- HOMA-IR)、C反应蛋白和同型半胱氨酸(女性92.9%,平均年龄44.9±15.2岁)。根据TSH受体抗体[阳性(n = 57)或阴性(n = 69)]和甲状腺功能[甲状腺功能亢进(n = 74),亚临床(n = 29)或临床甲状腺功能亢进(n = 22)]将患者分为亚组。采用Spearman相关、t检验和Mann-Whitney检验进行统计分析。结果:TSH受体抗体阳性组与阴性组比较,载脂蛋白B明显降低(80.3±23.9 vs 89.7±23.8 mg/dL;p = 0.047)和TSH [0.180 (0.002-1.080) vs 1.020 (0.235-2.055) μUI/mL;TSH受体抗体阳性组p < 0.001]。与甲状腺功能正常组相比,临床甲状腺功能亢进组患者载脂蛋白B明显降低(70.9±25.8 vs 89.8±24.0 mg/dL);p = 0.007]和更高的空腹血糖(96.0±24.4 vs 86.4±10.0 mg/dL;p = 0.019),胰岛素[10.4(6.2 - -15.8)和7.5(4.8 - -9.7)μUI /毫升;p = 0.021), HOMA-IR[2.09(1.29 - -4.53)和1.55 (0.96 - -2.13);p = 0.023]和C反应蛋白[0.57 (0.20-0.93)vs 0.20 (0.07-0.38) mg/L;P = 0.005]。亚临床甲状腺功能亢进组与正常组无明显差异。TSH与TSH受体抗体呈负相关(r = -0.386;P < 0.001)。载脂蛋白B与TSH呈正相关(r = 0.236;p = 0.016),与TSH受体抗体呈负相关(r = -0.211;P = 0.030)。游离T3、游离T4与空腹胰岛素呈正相关(r = 0.268;P = 0.008, r = 0.226;p = 0.025)和HOMA-IR (r = 0.258;P = 0.010, r = 0.259;P = 0.010)。游离T4与空腹血糖也呈正相关(r = 0.269;P = 0.008)。结论:Graves病患者甲状腺功能、自身免疫、胰岛素抵抗和血脂之间的相互关系可能与心血管风险增加有关。脂质谱显示有降血脂作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1