Differences in perception of online anesthesiology between Thai medical students and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Darunee Sripadungkul, Suwitcha Sripadungkul, Suhattaya Boonmak, Polpun Boonmak
{"title":"Differences in perception of online anesthesiology between Thai medical students and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Darunee Sripadungkul,&nbsp;Suwitcha Sripadungkul,&nbsp;Suhattaya Boonmak,&nbsp;Polpun Boonmak","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2023.248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traditional anesthesiology learning was disrupted by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and replaced by online learning. Students and teachers did not prepare well for this change. Determining the differences in perceptions can close the gap and develop more effective curricula. Our study aims to compare students' and teachers' perceptions of online anesthesiology learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective descriptive study, a cross-sectional survey between July 2020 and January 2021 in the Anesthesiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Our participants were fifth-year medical students and teachers participating in online anesthesiology. We compared the perception of the teaching process, support system, learning outcomes, satisfaction, and preference. Using an online structured questionnaire survey with a 4-point Likert scale to measure the degree of agreement with each item. We analyzed the difference between students' and teachers' perceptions by topic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received responses from 174 students and 24 teachers. Students had a significantly higher proportion of positive perceptions than teachers on the teaching process (theoretical teaching, problem-based learning, feedback, and response system), on a support system (technological support, connectivity, and learning materials), on learning outcomes (clinical practice readiness, critical thinking, long-term memory, and enthusiasm), satisfaction score, and online learning preference (p&lt;0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in perception were high in many aspects of online anesthesiology learning. This perception gap was particularly evident in the teaching process, support system, and learning outcomes. And Thai students had more preference for online learning than teachers. Strategies to reduce the gap should focus on teachers' training and supporting online learning should be concerned.</p>","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":"35 1","pages":"45-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/78/kjme-2023-248.PMC10020060.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2023.248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Traditional anesthesiology learning was disrupted by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and replaced by online learning. Students and teachers did not prepare well for this change. Determining the differences in perceptions can close the gap and develop more effective curricula. Our study aims to compare students' and teachers' perceptions of online anesthesiology learning.

Methods: We conducted a prospective descriptive study, a cross-sectional survey between July 2020 and January 2021 in the Anesthesiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Our participants were fifth-year medical students and teachers participating in online anesthesiology. We compared the perception of the teaching process, support system, learning outcomes, satisfaction, and preference. Using an online structured questionnaire survey with a 4-point Likert scale to measure the degree of agreement with each item. We analyzed the difference between students' and teachers' perceptions by topic.

Results: We received responses from 174 students and 24 teachers. Students had a significantly higher proportion of positive perceptions than teachers on the teaching process (theoretical teaching, problem-based learning, feedback, and response system), on a support system (technological support, connectivity, and learning materials), on learning outcomes (clinical practice readiness, critical thinking, long-term memory, and enthusiasm), satisfaction score, and online learning preference (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Differences in perception were high in many aspects of online anesthesiology learning. This perception gap was particularly evident in the teaching process, support system, and learning outcomes. And Thai students had more preference for online learning than teachers. Strategies to reduce the gap should focus on teachers' training and supporting online learning should be concerned.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间泰国医学生和教师对在线麻醉认知的差异
目的:受2019冠状病毒病大流行影响,传统麻醉学学习被在线学习所取代。学生和老师都没有为这一变化做好准备。确定观念上的差异可以缩小差距,开发更有效的课程。本研究旨在比较学生和教师对在线麻醉学学习的看法。方法:我们于2020年7月至2021年1月在泰国孔庆大学医学院麻醉科进行了一项前瞻性描述性横断面调查。我们的参与者是参加在线麻醉学的五年级医学生和教师。我们比较了对教学过程、支持系统、学习成果、满意度和偏好的看法。采用4点李克特量表的在线结构化问卷调查来衡量对每个项目的同意程度。我们分析了学生和教师在主题认知上的差异。结果:共收到174名学生和24名教师的反馈。学生对教学过程(理论教学、基于问题的学习、反馈和反应系统)、支持系统(技术支持、连通性和学习材料)、学习成果(临床实践准备、批判性思维、长期记忆和热情)、满意度得分和在线学习偏好的积极感知比例显著高于教师(p<0.05)。结论:在线麻醉学学习在许多方面存在较大的认知差异。这种认知差距在教学过程、支持系统和学习成果方面尤为明显。泰国学生比老师更喜欢在线学习。缩小差距的策略应侧重于教师培训和支持在线学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean journal of medical education
Korean journal of medical education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model. "Hey, can I go home?": a qualitative case study of wellbeing and the work environment in surgical training. Behind the scenes: teachers collaboration to facilitate interprofessional education between medical and pharmacy students in Indonesia. Current status and challenges of faculty development in Korean medical education and strategies for advancement. Fostering professionalism among health professionals: the essential role of self-regulated and self-directed aptitudes of learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1