Amyloid-β in Alzheimer's disease - front and centre after all?

Q4 Neuroscience Neuronal signaling Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1042/NS20220086
Caroline Weglinski, Alexander Jeans
{"title":"Amyloid-β in Alzheimer's disease - front and centre after all?","authors":"Caroline Weglinski,&nbsp;Alexander Jeans","doi":"10.1042/NS20220086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The amyloid hypothesis, which proposes that accumulation of the peptide amyloid-β at synapses is the key driver of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis, has been the dominant idea in the field of Alzheimer's research for nearly 30 years. Recently, however, serious doubts about its validity have emerged, largely motivated by disappointing results from anti-amyloid therapeutics in clinical trials. As a result, much of the AD research effort has shifted to understanding the roles of a variety of other entities implicated in pathogenesis, such as microglia, astrocytes, apolipoprotein E and several others. All undoubtedly play an important role, but the nature of this has in many cases remained unclear, partly due to their pleiotropic functions. Here, we propose that all of these AD-related entities share at least one overlapping function, which is the local regulation of amyloid-β levels, and that this may be critical to their role in AD pathogenesis. We also review what is currently known of the actions of amyloid-β at the synapse in health and disease, and consider in particular how it might interact with the key AD-associated protein tau in the disease setting. There is much compelling evidence in support of the amyloid hypothesis; rather than detract from this, the implication of many disparate AD-associated cell types, molecules and processes in the regulation of amyloid-β levels may lend further support.</p>","PeriodicalId":74287,"journal":{"name":"Neuronal signaling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829960/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuronal signaling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1042/NS20220086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The amyloid hypothesis, which proposes that accumulation of the peptide amyloid-β at synapses is the key driver of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis, has been the dominant idea in the field of Alzheimer's research for nearly 30 years. Recently, however, serious doubts about its validity have emerged, largely motivated by disappointing results from anti-amyloid therapeutics in clinical trials. As a result, much of the AD research effort has shifted to understanding the roles of a variety of other entities implicated in pathogenesis, such as microglia, astrocytes, apolipoprotein E and several others. All undoubtedly play an important role, but the nature of this has in many cases remained unclear, partly due to their pleiotropic functions. Here, we propose that all of these AD-related entities share at least one overlapping function, which is the local regulation of amyloid-β levels, and that this may be critical to their role in AD pathogenesis. We also review what is currently known of the actions of amyloid-β at the synapse in health and disease, and consider in particular how it might interact with the key AD-associated protein tau in the disease setting. There is much compelling evidence in support of the amyloid hypothesis; rather than detract from this, the implication of many disparate AD-associated cell types, molecules and processes in the regulation of amyloid-β levels may lend further support.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
淀粉样蛋白β是阿尔茨海默病的前沿和中心?
近30年来,淀粉样蛋白假说一直是阿尔茨海默病研究领域的主导观点,该假说认为突触处淀粉样蛋白-β肽的积累是阿尔茨海默病(AD)发病机制的关键驱动因素。然而,最近出现了对其有效性的严重质疑,主要是由于抗淀粉样蛋白治疗在临床试验中令人失望的结果。因此,许多阿尔茨海默病的研究工作已经转移到了解各种其他实体在发病机制中的作用,如小胶质细胞、星形胶质细胞、载脂蛋白E等。毫无疑问,所有这些都发挥着重要作用,但在许多情况下,其性质尚不清楚,部分原因是它们的多效性。在这里,我们提出所有这些AD相关实体至少有一个重叠的功能,即淀粉样蛋白-β水平的局部调节,这可能是它们在AD发病机制中的关键作用。我们还回顾了目前已知的淀粉样蛋白β在健康和疾病中突触的作用,并特别考虑了它在疾病环境中如何与关键的ad相关蛋白tau相互作用。有许多令人信服的证据支持淀粉样蛋白假说;许多不同的ad相关细胞类型、分子和过程在淀粉样蛋白-β水平的调节中可能会提供进一步的支持,而不是减损这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Neural mechanisms of dopamine function in learning and memory in Caenorhabditis elegans Cytokine activity in Parkinson's disease. Modelling Alzheimer’s disease in a Dish – Dissecting Amyloid-β Metabolism in Human Neurons Inflammation and emotion regulation: a narrative review of evidence and mechanisms in emotion dysregulation disorders Inhibition of insulin-degrading enzyme in human neurons promotes amyloid-β deposition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1