A national survey of outpatient hysteroscopy

Lynne Rogerson, Sean Duffy
{"title":"A national survey of outpatient hysteroscopy","authors":"Lynne Rogerson,&nbsp;Sean Duffy","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00471.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To look at the current practice in outpatient hysteroscopy, in particular to determine the availability, staffing levels, equipment used, and facilities throughout the UK, and to ascertain why the service is not more widely available for patients.</p><p>A postal questionnaire with no follow up for non-responders.</p><p>National survey throughout the UK.</p><p>All consultant gynaecologists throughout the UK.</p><p>These were: the availability of outpatient hysteroscopy nationally; the reasons why outpatient hysteroscopy is presently not available in some units, and whether this facility was wanted in those units.</p><p>1148 questionnaires were mailed with 637 responses (55.5%), representing 80.7% of gynaecology units throughout the UK. Of the respondents, 55.6% had access to outpatient hysteroscopy, and of the respondents without access 77.7% would have liked the facility to be available. The reasons given for the lack of an outpatient hysteroscopy service were: lack of funding (35%); unavailable facilities (35%); alternative investigations employed (21.9%); not clinically appropriate (4.9%), and not cost-effective (3.2%).</p><p>Outpatient hysteroscopy is available but its extent could be improved. The clinics are generally run once per week, with about six patients per clinic. It appears to be a consultant-led service, and most of those consultants who do not have access to outpatient hysteroscopy would like the facility to be available but do not have the funding or facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 5-6","pages":"343-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00471.x","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00471.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

To look at the current practice in outpatient hysteroscopy, in particular to determine the availability, staffing levels, equipment used, and facilities throughout the UK, and to ascertain why the service is not more widely available for patients.

A postal questionnaire with no follow up for non-responders.

National survey throughout the UK.

All consultant gynaecologists throughout the UK.

These were: the availability of outpatient hysteroscopy nationally; the reasons why outpatient hysteroscopy is presently not available in some units, and whether this facility was wanted in those units.

1148 questionnaires were mailed with 637 responses (55.5%), representing 80.7% of gynaecology units throughout the UK. Of the respondents, 55.6% had access to outpatient hysteroscopy, and of the respondents without access 77.7% would have liked the facility to be available. The reasons given for the lack of an outpatient hysteroscopy service were: lack of funding (35%); unavailable facilities (35%); alternative investigations employed (21.9%); not clinically appropriate (4.9%), and not cost-effective (3.2%).

Outpatient hysteroscopy is available but its extent could be improved. The clinics are generally run once per week, with about six patients per clinic. It appears to be a consultant-led service, and most of those consultants who do not have access to outpatient hysteroscopy would like the facility to be available but do not have the funding or facilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊宫腔镜全国调查
查看门诊宫腔镜的当前实践,特别是确定整个英国的可用性、人员配备水平、使用的设备和设施,并确定为什么这项服务没有更广泛地为患者提供。一份邮寄问卷,对没有回应的人不予跟进。全英国的全国性调查。全英国所有咨询妇科医生。这些是:全国门诊宫腔镜的可用性;门诊宫腔镜目前不能在某些单位使用的原因,以及这些单位是否需要这种设施。邮寄了1148份问卷,其中637份回复(55.5%),占整个英国妇科单位的80.7%。在受访者中,55.6%的人有机会接受门诊宫腔镜检查,而在没有机会的受访者中,77.7%的人希望有这种设施。缺乏门诊宫腔镜服务的原因是:缺乏资金(35%);没有设施(35%);采用替代调查(21.9%);临床不合适(4.9%),不具有成本效益(3.2%)。门诊宫腔镜是可用的,但其程度有待提高。诊所一般每周开一次,每个诊所约有6名病人。这似乎是一项由咨询师主导的服务,大多数没有机会进行门诊宫腔镜检查的咨询师都希望有这样的设施,但没有资金或设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microendoscopy in the operating room†: author's reply Broken needle tip in Cooper's ligament: high occurrence rate with the EndostitchTM suturing device† Ray Garry's reply to Prof. Dr Rudnicki's letter Reply to Jones Images of endometriosis: an interactive CD-ROM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1