Early experience with robot-assisted Frey's procedure surgical outcome and technique: Indian perspective.

Ankit Shukla, Senthil Gnanasekaran, Raja Kalayarasan, Biju Pottakkat
{"title":"Early experience with robot-assisted Frey's procedure surgical outcome and technique: Indian perspective.","authors":"Ankit Shukla,&nbsp;Senthil Gnanasekaran,&nbsp;Raja Kalayarasan,&nbsp;Biju Pottakkat","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robotic surgery for pancreatic diseases is currently on the rise, feasible, well-accepted, and safe. Frequently performed procedures in relation to pancreatic diseases include distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy. The literature commonly describes robotic lateral pancreaticojejunostomy; however, data on robot-assisted Frey's is scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We herein, describe our series and technique of robot-assisted Frey's procedure at our tertiary care center between November 2019 and March 2022, and its short-term outcomes in comparison to the open Frey's. Patients with chronic pancreatitis having intractable pain, dilated duct, and no evidence of inflammatory head mass or malignancy were included in the study for robot-assisted Frey's.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, out of 32 patients, nine patients underwent robot assisted Frey's procedure. The duration of surgery was significantly longer in robotic group (570 minutes vs. 360 minutes, <i>p</i> = 0.003). The medians of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative analgesic requirement were lower in robotic group, but the difference was not statistically significant (250 mL vs. 350 mL, <i>p</i> = 0.400 and 3 days vs. 4 days, <i>p</i> = 0.200, respectively). The median length of hospital stay was shorter in the robotic group, though not significant (6 days vs. 7 days, <i>p</i> = 0.540). At a median follow-up of 28 months, there was no significant difference in the postoperative complications and short-term outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic surgery offers benefits of laparoscopic surgery in addition it has better visualization, magnification, dexterity, and ergonomics. Frey's procedure is possible robotically with acceptable outcomes in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"25 4","pages":"145-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/b7/jmis-25-4-145.PMC9763489.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Robotic surgery for pancreatic diseases is currently on the rise, feasible, well-accepted, and safe. Frequently performed procedures in relation to pancreatic diseases include distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy. The literature commonly describes robotic lateral pancreaticojejunostomy; however, data on robot-assisted Frey's is scarce.

Methods: We herein, describe our series and technique of robot-assisted Frey's procedure at our tertiary care center between November 2019 and March 2022, and its short-term outcomes in comparison to the open Frey's. Patients with chronic pancreatitis having intractable pain, dilated duct, and no evidence of inflammatory head mass or malignancy were included in the study for robot-assisted Frey's.

Results: In our study, out of 32 patients, nine patients underwent robot assisted Frey's procedure. The duration of surgery was significantly longer in robotic group (570 minutes vs. 360 minutes, p = 0.003). The medians of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative analgesic requirement were lower in robotic group, but the difference was not statistically significant (250 mL vs. 350 mL, p = 0.400 and 3 days vs. 4 days, p = 0.200, respectively). The median length of hospital stay was shorter in the robotic group, though not significant (6 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.540). At a median follow-up of 28 months, there was no significant difference in the postoperative complications and short-term outcomes between the two groups.

Conclusion: Robotic surgery offers benefits of laparoscopic surgery in addition it has better visualization, magnification, dexterity, and ergonomics. Frey's procedure is possible robotically with acceptable outcomes in selected patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期机器人辅助弗雷氏手术的经验、手术结果和技术:印度视角。
目的:胰腺疾病的机器人手术目前呈上升趋势,可行、被广泛接受和安全。与胰腺疾病相关的常用手术包括远端胰腺切除术和胰十二指肠切除术。文献通常描述机器人外侧胰空肠吻合术;然而,关于机器人辅助弗雷氏症的数据很少。方法:本文描述了我们在2019年11月至2022年3月期间在三级护理中心进行的机器人辅助Frey手术的系列和技术,以及与开放式Frey手术相比的短期结果。慢性胰腺炎患者伴有顽固性疼痛,导管扩张,无炎症性头部肿块或恶性肿瘤的证据被纳入机器人辅助Frey的研究中。结果:在我们的研究中,32名患者中,有9名患者接受了机器人辅助的Frey手术。机器人组手术时间明显更长(570分钟vs 360分钟,p = 0.003)。机器人组术中出血量和术后镇痛需求中位数较低,但差异无统计学意义(250 mL vs 350 mL, p = 0.400, 3 d vs 4 d, p = 0.200)。机器人组的中位住院时间较短,但不显著(6天对7天,p = 0.540)。中位随访28个月,两组术后并发症和短期预后无显著差异。结论:机器人手术不仅具有腹腔镜手术的优点,而且具有更好的可视化、放大、灵巧性和人体工程学。Frey的手术在选定的患者中可以通过机器人实现可接受的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute peritonitis caused by a ruptured urachal cyst accompanied by omphalitis in an adult: a case report and literature review. Analyzing the emergence of surgical robotics in Africa: a scoping review of pioneering procedures, platforms utilized, and outcome meta-analysis. Assessment of mechanical bowel preparation prior to nephrectomy in the minimally invasive surgery era: insights from a national database analysis in the United States. Automated machine learning with R: AutoML tools for beginners in clinical research. Is prophylactic abdominal drainage mandatory in laparoscopic hemicolectomy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1