Components, Models of Integration, and Outcomes Associated with Palliative/ end-of-Life Care Interventions in the Burn Unit: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1177/08258597221102735
Jonathan Bayuo, Hammoda Abu-Odah, Adwoa Owusuaa Koduah
{"title":"Components, Models of Integration, and Outcomes Associated with Palliative/ end-of-Life Care Interventions in the Burn Unit: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Jonathan Bayuo,&nbsp;Hammoda Abu-Odah,&nbsp;Adwoa Owusuaa Koduah","doi":"10.1177/08258597221102735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To scope the literature to ascertain the components of palliative care (PC) interventions for burn patients, models of integration, and outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Arksey and O'Malley scoping review design with narrative synthesis was employed and reported following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Primary studies reporting PC interventions in the burn unit were considered for inclusion. CINAHL via EBSCO, PubMed, EMBASE via OVID, Web of Science, and gray literature sources were searched from inception to June 2021. <b>Results:</b> Fifteen studies emerging from high-income settings were retained. Data were organized around three concepts: components of palliative/ end of life care in the burn unit; models of integration; and outcomes. The components of interventions based on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care End-of Life Group domains include decision-making, communication, symptom management and comfort care, spiritual support, and emotional and practical support for families. Consultative and integrative models were noted to be the strategies for integrating PC in the burn unit. The outcomes were varied with only few studies reporting healthcare staff related outcomes. <b>Conclusion:</b> PC may have the potential of improving end-of-life care in the burn unit albeit the limited studies and lack of standardized outcomes makes it difficult to draw stronger conclusions regarding what is likely to work best in the burn unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597221102735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To scope the literature to ascertain the components of palliative care (PC) interventions for burn patients, models of integration, and outcomes. Methods: Arksey and O'Malley scoping review design with narrative synthesis was employed and reported following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Primary studies reporting PC interventions in the burn unit were considered for inclusion. CINAHL via EBSCO, PubMed, EMBASE via OVID, Web of Science, and gray literature sources were searched from inception to June 2021. Results: Fifteen studies emerging from high-income settings were retained. Data were organized around three concepts: components of palliative/ end of life care in the burn unit; models of integration; and outcomes. The components of interventions based on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care End-of Life Group domains include decision-making, communication, symptom management and comfort care, spiritual support, and emotional and practical support for families. Consultative and integrative models were noted to be the strategies for integrating PC in the burn unit. The outcomes were varied with only few studies reporting healthcare staff related outcomes. Conclusion: PC may have the potential of improving end-of-life care in the burn unit albeit the limited studies and lack of standardized outcomes makes it difficult to draw stronger conclusions regarding what is likely to work best in the burn unit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烧伤科姑息/临终关怀干预的组成部分、整合模式和结果:范围综述
目的:对文献进行梳理,以确定烧伤患者姑息治疗(PC)干预措施的组成部分、整合模式和结果。方法:采用Arksey和O'Malley的叙述性综合评价设计,并按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行报道。报告PC干预在烧伤科的初步研究被纳入考虑。检索了从创立到2021年6月的EBSCO CINAHL、PubMed、OVID EMBASE、Web of Science和灰色文献来源。结果:来自高收入环境的15项研究被保留。数据围绕三个概念进行组织:烧伤病房的姑息/临终关怀组成部分;集成模型;和结果。干预措施的组成部分基于罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会危重护理临终组领域,包括决策,沟通,症状管理和舒适护理,精神支持,以及对家庭的情感和实际支持。咨询和综合模式被认为是整合烧伤单元PC的策略。结果各不相同,只有少数研究报告了与医护人员相关的结果。结论:PC可能有潜力改善烧伤病房的临终关怀,尽管有限的研究和缺乏标准化的结果使得很难得出更有力的结论,关于什么可能在烧伤病房最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
期刊最新文献
EMPOWERING END-OF-LIFE CONVERSATIONS: The Role of Specialized Nursing Teams in Facilitating Code Status Changes at Discharge. Family Peace and Affecting Factors in Family Caregivers of Patients With Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study. Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (e-PROMs) in Pediatric Palliative Oncology Care: A Scoping Review. A General Overview of Palliative Care in Morocco: Needs Far Beyond Means The Lived Experiences of Hospice Healthcare Workers Caring for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1