COURT STATISTICS – A TOOL FOR MANAGEMENT AND STRATEGIC PLANNING

Marina Matić Bošković
{"title":"COURT STATISTICS – A TOOL FOR MANAGEMENT AND STRATEGIC PLANNING","authors":"Marina Matić Bošković","doi":"10.47152/rkkp.58.3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Court statistics developed over the time from bureaucratic data collection to monitoring and evaluation of court performances and judicial reforms. In the Europe, the Council of Europe CEPEJ contributed to the promotion of court statistics as a tool for management over judiciary and evaluation of judicial performances. Modern use of statistical reporting requires setting of performance indicators, which tracking will enable monitoring of court performance and inform decision making on further actions. Some of performance indicators are recommended by the CEPEJ and are widely accepted, like clearance rate and disposition time. However, court statistics could include information beyond court cases, like financial data per court and human resource data, which could inform interventions in the area of human resource management and financial resource management, i.e. equalization of workload among courts and judges, as well as calculation of cost per case. The use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in the courts and court statistics contributed significantly to improvement of administration of justice, through development of automatized case management systems, automatic export of relevant reports on court performance based on predefined indicators. However, few preconditions are required for successful deployment of the ICT in judiciary. Countries were putting efforts to strengthen court statistics and some good practices were developed over time. Slovenia dashboard for improvement of disposition time and Serbian court maps for tracking backlog reduction are good examples that could be used replicated in countries with similar challenges and goals.","PeriodicalId":85724,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of criminal law, criminology, and police science","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of criminal law, criminology, and police science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.58.3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Court statistics developed over the time from bureaucratic data collection to monitoring and evaluation of court performances and judicial reforms. In the Europe, the Council of Europe CEPEJ contributed to the promotion of court statistics as a tool for management over judiciary and evaluation of judicial performances. Modern use of statistical reporting requires setting of performance indicators, which tracking will enable monitoring of court performance and inform decision making on further actions. Some of performance indicators are recommended by the CEPEJ and are widely accepted, like clearance rate and disposition time. However, court statistics could include information beyond court cases, like financial data per court and human resource data, which could inform interventions in the area of human resource management and financial resource management, i.e. equalization of workload among courts and judges, as well as calculation of cost per case. The use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in the courts and court statistics contributed significantly to improvement of administration of justice, through development of automatized case management systems, automatic export of relevant reports on court performance based on predefined indicators. However, few preconditions are required for successful deployment of the ICT in judiciary. Countries were putting efforts to strengthen court statistics and some good practices were developed over time. Slovenia dashboard for improvement of disposition time and Serbian court maps for tracking backlog reduction are good examples that could be used replicated in countries with similar challenges and goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法院统计数据-管理和战略规划的工具
随着时间的推移,法院统计从官僚数据收集发展到对法院业绩和司法改革的监测和评估。在欧洲,CEPEJ为促进法院统计作为管理司法和评价司法业绩的工具作出了贡献。统计报告的现代使用需要设定执行指标,跟踪这些指标将能够监测法院的执行情况,并为进一步行动的决策提供信息。一些性能指标是由CEPEJ推荐并被广泛接受的,如清除率和处置时间。但是,法院统计数据可以包括法庭案件以外的资料,如每个法院的财务数据和人力资源数据,这可以为人力资源管理和财政资源管理领域的干预措施提供信息,即法院和法官之间工作量的均衡,以及每个案件费用的计算。在法院和法院统计中使用信息和通信技术,通过发展自动化案件管理系统,根据预先确定的指标自动输出有关法院执行情况的报告,大大有助于改善司法行政。然而,在司法中成功部署信息和通信技术所需的先决条件很少。各国正在努力加强法院统计,并逐渐形成了一些良好做法。斯洛文尼亚改善处理时间的仪表板和塞尔维亚跟踪减少积压的法庭地图都是很好的例子,可以在具有类似挑战和目标的国家中复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT ON CHILDREN AND RESPOND TO SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOME PROBLEMS IN ACHIEVING THE REHABILITATION PURPOSE OF PUNISHMENT INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE OF PUNISHMENT IN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW THEORY AND PRACTICE THE USE OF HACKING TECHNIQUES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE EVALUATION OF HEALTH INTELLIGENCE STUDIES IN TURKEY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1