Constraints in the Adoption of Farm Pond in Drought Regions of Maharashtra

Gireesh Shivakumarappa, N. V. Kumbhare, R. Padaria, Pramod Kumar, Arpan Bhoumik, Shiv Prasad
{"title":"Constraints in the Adoption of Farm Pond in Drought Regions of Maharashtra","authors":"Gireesh Shivakumarappa, N. V. Kumbhare, R. Padaria, Pramod Kumar, Arpan Bhoumik, Shiv Prasad","doi":"10.48165/ijee.2023.59130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During 2021-22, the beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of the farm pond on-demand initiative in Maharashtra’s Vidarbha and Marathwada regions were analysed and identified the constraints associated with farm pond adoption. Through focus group discussions, observations, and semi-structured interviews with 160 beneficiaries and 160 non beneficiaries of the farm pond programme, quantitative and qualitative data were gathered. The adoption and discontinuation of agricultural ponds were analysed using the rank-based quotient (RBQ) approach to find barriers and contributing variables. After consulting with subject matter experts, reading pertinent literature, and having a conversation with respondents, a list of constraints divided into four major categories-technical, economic, ecological, and personal constraints-and the perceived significant reason for the discontinuation of the farm pond was noted. Results revealed that the economic constraints were considered the most serious ones, with a mean RBQ value of 88.85. Followed by technological (78.25), ecological (61.82) and personal constraints (58.18). Draining the bore well or well to store water in the farm pond was considered as the most serious perceived reason to discontinue the farm pond with an RBQ value of 44.94, followed by a less productive period of farm pond reported by the respondents with RBQ values 40.38.","PeriodicalId":13471,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Extension Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Extension Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48165/ijee.2023.59130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During 2021-22, the beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of the farm pond on-demand initiative in Maharashtra’s Vidarbha and Marathwada regions were analysed and identified the constraints associated with farm pond adoption. Through focus group discussions, observations, and semi-structured interviews with 160 beneficiaries and 160 non beneficiaries of the farm pond programme, quantitative and qualitative data were gathered. The adoption and discontinuation of agricultural ponds were analysed using the rank-based quotient (RBQ) approach to find barriers and contributing variables. After consulting with subject matter experts, reading pertinent literature, and having a conversation with respondents, a list of constraints divided into four major categories-technical, economic, ecological, and personal constraints-and the perceived significant reason for the discontinuation of the farm pond was noted. Results revealed that the economic constraints were considered the most serious ones, with a mean RBQ value of 88.85. Followed by technological (78.25), ecological (61.82) and personal constraints (58.18). Draining the bore well or well to store water in the farm pond was considered as the most serious perceived reason to discontinue the farm pond with an RBQ value of 44.94, followed by a less productive period of farm pond reported by the respondents with RBQ values 40.38.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马哈拉施特拉邦干旱地区采用农场池塘的制约因素
在2021- 2022年期间,对马哈拉施特拉邦维达尔巴和马拉特瓦达地区农场池塘按需计划的受益者和非受益者进行了分析,并确定了与农场池塘采用相关的制约因素。通过焦点小组讨论、观察和对农场池塘方案的160名受益者和160名非受益者的半结构化访谈,收集了定量和定性数据。采用基于秩的商(RBQ)方法对农业池塘的采用和终止进行了分析,以发现障碍和贡献变量。在咨询了主题专家,阅读了相关文献,并与受访者进行了交谈之后,列出了一份限制因素列表,分为四大类:技术,经济,生态和个人限制,并指出了终止农场池塘的重要原因。结果表明,经济制约因素最为严重,平均RBQ值为88.85。其次是技术(78.25)、生态(61.82)和个人约束(58.18)。RBQ值为44.94,被调查者认为是停止农场池塘的最严重原因,其次是农场池塘生产力下降,RBQ值为40.38。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Construction of Scale to Measure Women Farmers’ Attitude towards Climate Resilient Dairy Farming Practices Constraints Faced by Tomato Growers at Production and Marketing Level in Haryana Climate Change Adaptation Constraints among Paddy Growing Farmers in Kalyana-Karnataka Region of Karnataka State Entrepreneurial Aptitude of Women of an Aspirational District of Uttarakhand Cross-Cultural Comparative Analysis of Technological Gap between Tribal Pineapple Growers of Meghalaya, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1