Yield of forests in Ankara Regional Directory of Forestry in Turkey: comparison of regression and artificial neural network models based on statistical and biological behaviors

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.3832/ifor4116-015
Ferhat Bolat, İlker Ercanli, A. Günlü, M. Marchi
{"title":"Yield of forests in Ankara Regional Directory of Forestry in Turkey: comparison of regression and artificial neural network models based on statistical and biological behaviors","authors":"Ferhat Bolat, İlker Ercanli, A. Günlü, M. Marchi","doi":"10.3832/ifor4116-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Models of forest growth and yield provide important information on stand and tree developments and the interactions of these developments with silvicultural treatments. These models have been developed based on assumptions such as independence of observations, uncorrelated error terms, and error terms with constant variance; if these factors are absent, there may be problems with multicollinearity, autocorrelation, or heteroscedasticity, respectively. These problems, which have several adverse effects on parameter estimates, are statistical phenomena and must be avoided. In recent years, the artificial neural network (ANN) model, thanks to its superior features such as the ability to make successful predictions and the absence of the requirement for statistical assumptions, has been commonly used in forestry modeling. However, while goodness-of-fit measures were taken into consideration in the assessment of ANN models, the control of the biological characteristics of model predictions was ignored. In this study, variable-density yield models were developed using nonlinear regression and ANN techniques. These modeling techniques were compared based on some goodness-of-fit measures and the principles of forest yield. The results showed that ANN models were more successful in meeting expected biological patterns than regression models.","PeriodicalId":13323,"journal":{"name":"Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4116-015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Models of forest growth and yield provide important information on stand and tree developments and the interactions of these developments with silvicultural treatments. These models have been developed based on assumptions such as independence of observations, uncorrelated error terms, and error terms with constant variance; if these factors are absent, there may be problems with multicollinearity, autocorrelation, or heteroscedasticity, respectively. These problems, which have several adverse effects on parameter estimates, are statistical phenomena and must be avoided. In recent years, the artificial neural network (ANN) model, thanks to its superior features such as the ability to make successful predictions and the absence of the requirement for statistical assumptions, has been commonly used in forestry modeling. However, while goodness-of-fit measures were taken into consideration in the assessment of ANN models, the control of the biological characteristics of model predictions was ignored. In this study, variable-density yield models were developed using nonlinear regression and ANN techniques. These modeling techniques were compared based on some goodness-of-fit measures and the principles of forest yield. The results showed that ANN models were more successful in meeting expected biological patterns than regression models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其安卡拉森林产量区域林业目录:基于统计和生物行为的回归模型和人工神经网络模型的比较
森林生长和产量模型提供了林分和树木发育以及这些发育与造林处理之间相互作用的重要信息。这些模型是基于诸如观测的独立性、不相关的误差项和具有恒定方差的误差项等假设而开发的;如果这些因素不存在,则可能分别存在多重共线性、自相关或异方差问题。这些对参数估计有不利影响的问题是统计现象,必须加以避免。近年来,人工神经网络(artificial neural network, ANN)模型因其预测能力强、不需要统计假设等优点,在林业建模中得到了广泛的应用。然而,虽然在评估人工神经网络模型时考虑了拟合优度措施,但忽略了对模型预测的生物学特性的控制。本文采用非线性回归和人工神经网络技术建立了变密度产量模型。根据拟合优度指标和森林产量原则,对这些建模技术进行了比较。结果表明,人工神经网络模型比回归模型更能成功地满足预期的生物模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal encompasses a broad range of research aspects concerning forest science: forest ecology, biodiversity/genetics and ecophysiology, silviculture, forest inventory and planning, forest protection and monitoring, forest harvesting, landscape ecology, forest history, wood technology.
期刊最新文献
How biomass and other tree architectural characteristics relate to the structural complexity of a beech-pine forest Performance assessment of two plotless sampling methods for density estimation applied to some Alpine forests of northeastern Italy A WebGIS tool to support forest management at regional and local scale Variations in the performance of hybrid poplars subjected to the inoculation of a microbial consortium and water restriction Effects of silvicultural thinning on stand structure and coarse woody debris in the deciduous Arasbaran forest, Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1