Clinical course of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

T. Zolotarova, M. Brynza
{"title":"Clinical course of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation","authors":"T. Zolotarova, M. Brynza","doi":"10.26565/2313-6693-2020-40-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introducrion. Recent randomized controlled trials suggest that catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) patients leads to improvements in left ventricular function, exercise capacity, and quality of life, but focused on HF with reduced left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). Aim. To study the clinical course of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Materials and methods. 194 patients with AF and chronic HF with preserved ejection fraction were included in the study: 136 patients – underwent catheter ablation (CA) for AF; 58 − control group, who continued pharmacological therapy (PT) for rhythm control strategy. All the patients had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I, II or III HF, LVEF > 40 %. Baseline characteristics comprised demographic and clinical data, medical history echocardiography and ECG results of the included patients. Results. Patients on PT were significantly more symptomatic for HF in comparison to CA patients (the average value of NYHA class HF 2,2 ± 07 versus (vs.) 1,8 ± 0,6; p = 0,019), but AF for itself were more symptomatic in CA group (the average value of EHRA 3,1 ± 0,5 vs. 2,9 ± 0,6; p = 0,001). Among patients with HF with preserved LVEF who underwent CA and were followed-up 24 months 52,9 % of patients remained free of AF recurrence; while in the control group only 7 %. At the 24 months follow-up NYHA class significantly improved in ablation group, as well as EHRA score. Conclusions. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was associated with improved the clinical course of chronic heart failure with preserved left ventricle ejection fraction and AF – related symptoms itself.","PeriodicalId":31685,"journal":{"name":"Journal of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University Series Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"117-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University Series Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2313-6693-2020-40-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introducrion. Recent randomized controlled trials suggest that catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) patients leads to improvements in left ventricular function, exercise capacity, and quality of life, but focused on HF with reduced left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). Aim. To study the clinical course of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Materials and methods. 194 patients with AF and chronic HF with preserved ejection fraction were included in the study: 136 patients – underwent catheter ablation (CA) for AF; 58 − control group, who continued pharmacological therapy (PT) for rhythm control strategy. All the patients had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I, II or III HF, LVEF > 40 %. Baseline characteristics comprised demographic and clinical data, medical history echocardiography and ECG results of the included patients. Results. Patients on PT were significantly more symptomatic for HF in comparison to CA patients (the average value of NYHA class HF 2,2 ± 07 versus (vs.) 1,8 ± 0,6; p = 0,019), but AF for itself were more symptomatic in CA group (the average value of EHRA 3,1 ± 0,5 vs. 2,9 ± 0,6; p = 0,001). Among patients with HF with preserved LVEF who underwent CA and were followed-up 24 months 52,9 % of patients remained free of AF recurrence; while in the control group only 7 %. At the 24 months follow-up NYHA class significantly improved in ablation group, as well as EHRA score. Conclusions. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was associated with improved the clinical course of chronic heart failure with preserved left ventricle ejection fraction and AF – related symptoms itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心房颤动射频导管消融后保留射血分数的慢性心力衰竭的临床病程
Introducrion。最近的随机对照试验表明,心力衰竭(HF)患者的房颤(AF)导管消融可改善左心室功能、运动能力和生活质量,但主要集中在左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低的HF患者。的目标。目的:探讨房颤射频消融后保留射血分数的慢性心力衰竭的临床过程。材料和方法。194例房颤和慢性心衰患者纳入研究,并保留射血分数:136例房颤患者接受导管消融(CA);58−对照组,继续采用药物治疗(PT)进行节律控制策略。所有患者均为纽约心脏协会(NYHA) I、II或III级HF, LVEF bb0 40%。基线特征包括纳入患者的人口学和临床资料、病史、超声心动图和心电图结果。结果。与CA患者相比,PT患者的HF症状明显加重(NYHA分级HF的平均值2,2±07 vs. (vs.) 1,8±0.6;p = 0,019),但AF本身在CA组更有症状(EHRA平均值3,1±0,5 vs. 2,9±0,6;p = 0.001)。在保留LVEF的HF患者中,接受CA并随访24个月,9%的患者仍然没有房颤复发;而对照组只有7%。随访24个月,消融组NYHA分级及EHRA评分均显著提高。结论。射频导管消融可改善慢性心力衰竭的临床病程,同时保留左心室射血分数和房颤相关症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of the course acute thromboembolism of the pulmonary artery in women Influence of microbial colonization of the endometry on its function and development of hyperproliferative conditions Features of short-term variability of arterial pressure with different types of circadian rhythm in patients with hypertension disease who have suffered myocardial infarction Expression of cytokeratin and vimentin in villi of the chorion with anteintranatal fetal death on the background of complicated pregnancy Masticatory myofascial pain syndrome provoked by SARS-COV-2 infection in a patient with orofacial pathology (clinical case)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1