Best Practice to Establish a Reservoir Management Guideline and Operating Strategy Envelope for Improved Water Injection Strategy and Production Sustainability Assurance in a Continuous Reservoir

E. Haryanto, Shubham Mishra, Saltanat Yersaiyn, Javed Jasmeed Adam, I. Khattak
{"title":"Best Practice to Establish a Reservoir Management Guideline and Operating Strategy Envelope for Improved Water Injection Strategy and Production Sustainability Assurance in a Continuous Reservoir","authors":"E. Haryanto, Shubham Mishra, Saltanat Yersaiyn, Javed Jasmeed Adam, I. Khattak","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22036-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reservoir management of a developed oil field with the goal of fulfilling field development requirements and objectives is a continuous challenging process. Over time, the production and injection control, along with pressure maintenance strategies, are refined to achieve not only maximum recovery but also the most capital-efficient field development.\n A reservoir sectorization philosophy, by dissecting the reservoir into smaller reservoir management subareas, is commonly adopted for a large oil field. The high granularity sectorization scheme is often preferred to achieve a harmonized recovery across the field. However, a high sectorization number in a relatively continuous and noncompartmentalized reservoir can lead to some surveillance and data allocation challenges when wells are crossing multiple sector boundaries. With these challenges, we established two key aspects of reservoir management: first is to assess a potentially lower number of sectorization, and second is to generate a well level production and injection guideline. These guidelines must fulfill both short-term production sustainability assurance and long-term field development requirements and objectives.\n In this paper we present an integrated workflow to establish a reservoir management guideline. We started by an analytical evaluation of the historical reservoir management and waterflooding practices. The identified area(s) of improvement from the analytical evaluation were incorporated into dynamic models for different sectorization schemes. The simulation outputs were thoroughly analyzed by a standardized criteria matrix where several parameters were cross referenced to select the optimal sectorization scheme to achieve an even pressure depletion, harmonized sweep, absence of water-cut disparity along with strong economic indicators. A data analytic process on a large pool of historical well production tests and a historical surveillance database was performed to derive different well-level production and injection constraints. Subsequently, output results from sensitivity analysis were evaluated to finalize a robust new operating guideline.\n In this paper we will highlight some lessons learned from a case study where a lower number of reservoir management sectors also provided a substantial added value. The benefits are more apparent with implementation of new well-level guidelines where well-level production, injection, artificial lift, and pressure guidelines are recommended for operational considerations. The workflow to establish or to revise a reservoir management strategy from this study helped to lay out the critical foundation for all the stakeholders involved in asset management.\n The reservoir management practice presented in this paper is useful to make informed decisions so that well-rounded recommendations are available for production sustainability assurance and long-term field production performance optimization. Other fields may also benefit from the reservoir management concepts and workflows presented in this paper.","PeriodicalId":10974,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, February 22, 2022","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, February 22, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22036-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reservoir management of a developed oil field with the goal of fulfilling field development requirements and objectives is a continuous challenging process. Over time, the production and injection control, along with pressure maintenance strategies, are refined to achieve not only maximum recovery but also the most capital-efficient field development. A reservoir sectorization philosophy, by dissecting the reservoir into smaller reservoir management subareas, is commonly adopted for a large oil field. The high granularity sectorization scheme is often preferred to achieve a harmonized recovery across the field. However, a high sectorization number in a relatively continuous and noncompartmentalized reservoir can lead to some surveillance and data allocation challenges when wells are crossing multiple sector boundaries. With these challenges, we established two key aspects of reservoir management: first is to assess a potentially lower number of sectorization, and second is to generate a well level production and injection guideline. These guidelines must fulfill both short-term production sustainability assurance and long-term field development requirements and objectives. In this paper we present an integrated workflow to establish a reservoir management guideline. We started by an analytical evaluation of the historical reservoir management and waterflooding practices. The identified area(s) of improvement from the analytical evaluation were incorporated into dynamic models for different sectorization schemes. The simulation outputs were thoroughly analyzed by a standardized criteria matrix where several parameters were cross referenced to select the optimal sectorization scheme to achieve an even pressure depletion, harmonized sweep, absence of water-cut disparity along with strong economic indicators. A data analytic process on a large pool of historical well production tests and a historical surveillance database was performed to derive different well-level production and injection constraints. Subsequently, output results from sensitivity analysis were evaluated to finalize a robust new operating guideline. In this paper we will highlight some lessons learned from a case study where a lower number of reservoir management sectors also provided a substantial added value. The benefits are more apparent with implementation of new well-level guidelines where well-level production, injection, artificial lift, and pressure guidelines are recommended for operational considerations. The workflow to establish or to revise a reservoir management strategy from this study helped to lay out the critical foundation for all the stakeholders involved in asset management. The reservoir management practice presented in this paper is useful to make informed decisions so that well-rounded recommendations are available for production sustainability assurance and long-term field production performance optimization. Other fields may also benefit from the reservoir management concepts and workflows presented in this paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立油藏管理指南和操作策略包,以改进注水策略和保证连续油藏的可持续性生产
已开发油田的油藏管理是一个具有挑战性的过程,其目标是实现油田开发要求和目标。随着时间的推移,生产和注入控制以及压力保持策略不断完善,不仅可以实现最大采收率,还可以实现最具资本效率的油田开发。对于大型油田,通常采用将油藏划分为较小的油藏管理分区的油藏分区理念。高粒度分段方案通常是首选,以实现整个油田的协调回收。然而,在一个相对连续和非分隔的油藏中,当油井跨越多个扇区边界时,较高的扇区数可能会给监测和数据分配带来一些挑战。面对这些挑战,我们建立了油藏管理的两个关键方面:首先是评估潜在的较低分段数量,其次是生成井级生产和注入指南。这些指导方针必须满足短期生产可持续性保证和长期油田开发要求和目标。在本文中,我们提出了一个集成的工作流程来建立一个水库管理指南。我们首先对历史油藏管理和注水实践进行了分析评估。从分析评价中确定的改进领域被纳入不同部门化方案的动态模型。通过一个标准化的标准矩阵对模拟结果进行了彻底的分析,其中交叉引用了几个参数,以选择最佳的分区方案,以实现均匀的压力耗尽,协调的波及,没有含水差异以及强大的经济指标。通过对大量历史井生产测试和历史监测数据库进行数据分析,得出不同井位的生产和注入约束条件。随后,对敏感性分析的输出结果进行评估,最终确定一个稳健的新操作指南。在本文中,我们将重点介绍从案例研究中吸取的一些经验教训,在该案例中,较少的油藏管理部门也提供了大量的附加价值。实施新的井级指导方针,将井级生产、注入、人工举升和压力指导方针推荐到作业考虑中,其优势更加明显。根据该研究,建立或修改油藏管理策略的工作流程有助于为参与资产管理的所有利益相关者奠定关键基础。本文介绍的油藏管理实践有助于做出明智的决策,从而为保证生产可持续性和长期油田生产绩效优化提供全面的建议。其他领域也可以从本文提出的油藏管理概念和工作流程中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Newly Designed High Expansion Through-Tubing Bridge Plug Service to Reduce Operational Costs and Increase Reliability Pore Geometry Effect on Si, Trapping and Sor in Tight Carbonate Reservoirs Auto-Curve: Downhole Trajectory Automation with Cost Reduction to the Operator by Reducing the Time-to-Target Optimization and Thermal Performance Assessment of Elliptical Pin-Fin Heat Sinks Three-Phase Saturation Evaluation Using Advanced Pulsed Neutron Measurement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1