A Systematic Review of Treatment Strategies Including Future Novel Therapies in Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever

H. Kouhpayeh
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Treatment Strategies Including Future Novel Therapies in Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever","authors":"H. Kouhpayeh","doi":"10.5812/IJI.113427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is an acute fetal illness the case fatality rate (CFR), which without treatment is between 26% to more than 80%. Despite the administration of ribavirin as a specific antiviral drug for the treatment of CCHF from many years ago, its clinical efficacy is still controversial. Objectives: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ribavirin, favipiravir, and other treatment options for CCHF, including steroids, immunoglobulin, etc. Method: This systematic review included 31 articles, three factsheet from WHO, CDC, and ECDC, two editorial letters, and two textbooks from 2002 to 2020. The following databases were searched: Google Scholar, PubMed, Medscape, Cochrane, WHO, CDC, and ECDC. Results: The selected results of the above articles were concentrated on the different options of supportive treatment, including steroids, immunoglobulin, etc., as well as the efficacy of antiviral drugs, especially ribavirin and favipiravir. While some studies confirmed the clinical efficacy of ribavirin in the treatment of CCHF, some other studies did not confirm its efficacy. All studies justified that supportive therapies are the mainstay of treatment. Conclusions: The cornerstone of therapy of CCHF is supportive treatment. The clinical efficacy of ribavirin for CCHF treatment is questionable, and further randomized case-control clinical trials are required to confirm and recommend it for CCHF treatment. Also, other treatment strategies, including administration of steroids, immunoglobulin, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) require more conclusive data. The promising antiviral drug for CCHF treatment is favipiravir.","PeriodicalId":13989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infection","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/IJI.113427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is an acute fetal illness the case fatality rate (CFR), which without treatment is between 26% to more than 80%. Despite the administration of ribavirin as a specific antiviral drug for the treatment of CCHF from many years ago, its clinical efficacy is still controversial. Objectives: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ribavirin, favipiravir, and other treatment options for CCHF, including steroids, immunoglobulin, etc. Method: This systematic review included 31 articles, three factsheet from WHO, CDC, and ECDC, two editorial letters, and two textbooks from 2002 to 2020. The following databases were searched: Google Scholar, PubMed, Medscape, Cochrane, WHO, CDC, and ECDC. Results: The selected results of the above articles were concentrated on the different options of supportive treatment, including steroids, immunoglobulin, etc., as well as the efficacy of antiviral drugs, especially ribavirin and favipiravir. While some studies confirmed the clinical efficacy of ribavirin in the treatment of CCHF, some other studies did not confirm its efficacy. All studies justified that supportive therapies are the mainstay of treatment. Conclusions: The cornerstone of therapy of CCHF is supportive treatment. The clinical efficacy of ribavirin for CCHF treatment is questionable, and further randomized case-control clinical trials are required to confirm and recommend it for CCHF treatment. Also, other treatment strategies, including administration of steroids, immunoglobulin, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) require more conclusive data. The promising antiviral drug for CCHF treatment is favipiravir.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克里米亚-刚果出血热治疗策略及未来新疗法的系统综述
简介:克里米亚-刚果出血热(CCHF)是一种急性胎儿疾病,病死率(CFR)在未经治疗的情况下在26%至80%以上。尽管利巴韦林作为治疗慢性心力衰竭的特异性抗病毒药物使用已有多年,但其临床疗效仍存在争议。目的:本系统综述旨在评价利巴韦林、法匹拉韦及其他治疗方案(包括类固醇、免疫球蛋白等)治疗CCHF的临床疗效。方法:本系统综述包括31篇文章、3份来自WHO、CDC和ECDC的情况介绍、2封社论和2本教科书(2002 - 2020年)。检索了以下数据库:谷歌Scholar、PubMed、Medscape、Cochrane、WHO、CDC和ECDC。结果:以上文章的选择结果集中在支持治疗的不同选择,包括类固醇、免疫球蛋白等,以及抗病毒药物的疗效,尤其是利巴韦林和法匹拉韦。一些研究证实了利巴韦林治疗慢性心力衰竭的临床疗效,但也有一些研究没有证实其疗效。所有的研究都证明支持疗法是主要的治疗方法。结论:支持治疗是慢性心力衰竭治疗的基础。利巴韦林治疗慢性心力衰竭的临床疗效值得怀疑,需要进一步的随机病例对照临床试验来证实和推荐利巴韦林治疗慢性心力衰竭。此外,其他治疗策略,包括类固醇、免疫球蛋白和单克隆抗体(mab)的使用,需要更多的结论性数据。治疗慢性心力衰竭最有希望的抗病毒药物是法匹拉韦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Antibiotic Susceptibility, Carbapenemase and Metallobetalactamase-producing Strains of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from Hospitalized Patients in Zahedan During 2019 - 2022 Associations Between Blood Group and COVID-19 Mortality, Severity, and Length of Hospitalization Pulmonary Hemorrhage in Neonates with COVID-19 Computerized Tomography Scan Findings in Pediatric Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Urinary Tract Infections Among Patients with Recent Antibiotic Use: A Cross-sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1