Evaluation of bottom-up modeling of the blood–brain barrier to improve brain penetration prediction via physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition Pub Date : 2023-01-11 DOI:10.1002/bdd.2344
Christine Bowman, Fang Ma, Jialin Mao, Emile Plise, Eugene Chen, Liling Liu, Shu Zhang, Yuan Chen
{"title":"Evaluation of bottom-up modeling of the blood–brain barrier to improve brain penetration prediction via physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling","authors":"Christine Bowman,&nbsp;Fang Ma,&nbsp;Jialin Mao,&nbsp;Emile Plise,&nbsp;Eugene Chen,&nbsp;Liling Liu,&nbsp;Shu Zhang,&nbsp;Yuan Chen","doi":"10.1002/bdd.2344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predicting the brain penetration of drugs has been notoriously difficult; however, recently, permeability-limited brain models have been constructed. Lead optimization for central nervous system compounds often focuses on compounds that have low transporter efflux, where passive permeability could be a main driver in determining cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/brain concentrations. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the translatability of passive permeability data generated from different in vitro systems and its impact on the prediction of human CSF/brain concentrations using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. In vitro data were generated using gMDCK and parallel artificial membrane permeability assay-blood–brain barrier for comparison and predictions using a quantitative structure-activity relationship model were also evaluated. PBPK modeling was then performed for seven compounds with moderate-high permeability and a range of efflux in vitro, and the CSF/brain mass concentrations and Kpuu were reasonably predicted. This work provides the first step of a promising approach using bottom-up PBPK modeling for CSF/brain penetration prediction to support lead optimization and clinical candidate selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":8865,"journal":{"name":"Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition","volume":"44 1","pages":"60-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdd.2344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting the brain penetration of drugs has been notoriously difficult; however, recently, permeability-limited brain models have been constructed. Lead optimization for central nervous system compounds often focuses on compounds that have low transporter efflux, where passive permeability could be a main driver in determining cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/brain concentrations. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the translatability of passive permeability data generated from different in vitro systems and its impact on the prediction of human CSF/brain concentrations using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. In vitro data were generated using gMDCK and parallel artificial membrane permeability assay-blood–brain barrier for comparison and predictions using a quantitative structure-activity relationship model were also evaluated. PBPK modeling was then performed for seven compounds with moderate-high permeability and a range of efflux in vitro, and the CSF/brain mass concentrations and Kpuu were reasonably predicted. This work provides the first step of a promising approach using bottom-up PBPK modeling for CSF/brain penetration prediction to support lead optimization and clinical candidate selection.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估自下而上的血脑屏障模型,通过基于生理的药代动力学模型改善脑渗透预测
众所周知,预测药物对大脑的渗透是非常困难的;然而,最近已经建立了渗透率受限的脑模型。中枢神经系统化合物的先导物优化通常侧重于具有低转运体外排的化合物,其中被动渗透率可能是确定脑脊液(CSF)/脑浓度的主要驱动因素。本研究的主要目的是利用基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型,评估来自不同体外系统的被动渗透性数据的可翻译性及其对预测人CSF/脑浓度的影响。使用gMDCK和平行人工膜透性测定-血脑屏障生成体外数据进行比较,并使用定量结构-活性关系模型进行预测。然后对7种具有中高渗透性和体外流出范围的化合物进行PBPK建模,合理预测脑脊液/脑质量浓度和Kpuu。这项工作提供了一种有前途的方法的第一步,使用自下而上的PBPK模型进行CSF/脑穿透预测,以支持先导物优化和临床候选物选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biopharmaceutics & Drug Dispositionpublishes original review articles, short communications, and reports in biopharmaceutics, drug disposition, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, especially those that have a direct relation to the drug discovery/development and the therapeutic use of drugs. These includes: - animal and human pharmacological studies that focus on therapeutic response. pharmacodynamics, and toxicity related to plasma and tissue concentrations of drugs and their metabolites, - in vitro and in vivo drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, transport, and excretion studies that facilitate investigations related to the use of drugs in man - studies on membrane transport and enzymes, including their regulation and the impact of pharmacogenomics on drug absorption and disposition, - simulation and modeling in drug discovery and development - theoretical treatises - includes themed issues and reviews and exclude manuscripts on - bioavailability studies reporting only on simple PK parameters such as Cmax, tmax and t1/2 without mechanistic interpretation - analytical methods
期刊最新文献
In Vivo Animal Spices and Experimental Technique to Evaluate Sustained Release Granules. Issue Information Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Compare the Biodistribution of Liposomal Amphotericin B With Conventional Amphotericin B Deoxycholate in Humans Exploring the Potential of Nasal Drug Delivery for Brain Targeted Therapy: A Detailed Analysis A limited sampling model to estimate the area under the curve of mycophenolic acid in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1