Hydrophilic Versus Lipophilic Statin Treatments in Patients With Renal Impairment After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Min Hye Kang, Weon Kim, J. S. Kim, K. Jeong, M. Jeong, J. Hwang, S. Hur, H. Hwang
{"title":"Hydrophilic Versus Lipophilic Statin Treatments in Patients With Renal Impairment After Acute Myocardial Infarction","authors":"Min Hye Kang, Weon Kim, J. S. Kim, K. Jeong, M. Jeong, J. Hwang, S. Hur, H. Hwang","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.121.024649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Hydrophilic and lipophilic statins have similar efficacies in treating coronary artery disease. However, specific factors relevant to renal impairment and different arterial pathogeneses could modify the clinical effects of statin lipophilicity, and create differences in protective effects between statin types in patients with renal impairment. Methods and Results A total of 2062 patients with acute myocardial infarction with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 were enrolled from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry between November 2011 and December 2015. The primary end point was a composite of 2‐year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACEs) after acute myocardial infarction occurrence. MACEs were defined as all‐cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke. Propensity‐score matching and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed. A total of 529 patients treated with hydrophilic statins were matched to 529 patients treated with lipophilic statins. There was no difference in the statin equivalent dose between the 2 statin groups. The cumulative event rate of MACEs, all‐cause mortality, and recurrent myocardial infarction were significantly lower in patients treated with hydrophilic statins in the propensity‐score matched population (all P<0.05). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, patients treated with hydrophilic statins had a lower risk for composite MACEs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55–0.90]), all‐cause mortality (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49–0.93]), and recurrent myocardial infarction (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.21–0.73]), but not for revascularization and ischemic stroke. Conclusions Hydrophilic statin treatment was associated with lower risk of MACEs and all‐cause mortality than lipophilic statin in a propensity‐score matched observational cohort of patients with renal impairment following acute myocardial infarction.","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background Hydrophilic and lipophilic statins have similar efficacies in treating coronary artery disease. However, specific factors relevant to renal impairment and different arterial pathogeneses could modify the clinical effects of statin lipophilicity, and create differences in protective effects between statin types in patients with renal impairment. Methods and Results A total of 2062 patients with acute myocardial infarction with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 were enrolled from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry between November 2011 and December 2015. The primary end point was a composite of 2‐year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACEs) after acute myocardial infarction occurrence. MACEs were defined as all‐cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke. Propensity‐score matching and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed. A total of 529 patients treated with hydrophilic statins were matched to 529 patients treated with lipophilic statins. There was no difference in the statin equivalent dose between the 2 statin groups. The cumulative event rate of MACEs, all‐cause mortality, and recurrent myocardial infarction were significantly lower in patients treated with hydrophilic statins in the propensity‐score matched population (all P<0.05). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, patients treated with hydrophilic statins had a lower risk for composite MACEs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55–0.90]), all‐cause mortality (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49–0.93]), and recurrent myocardial infarction (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.21–0.73]), but not for revascularization and ischemic stroke. Conclusions Hydrophilic statin treatment was associated with lower risk of MACEs and all‐cause mortality than lipophilic statin in a propensity‐score matched observational cohort of patients with renal impairment following acute myocardial infarction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲水与亲脂他汀类药物在急性心肌梗死后肾功能损害患者中的应用
背景:亲水和亲脂他汀类药物治疗冠状动脉疾病的疗效相似。然而,与肾脏损害相关的特定因素和不同的动脉病因可改变他汀类药物亲脂性的临床效果,并使他汀类药物在肾脏损害患者中的保护作用存在差异。方法和结果在2011年11月至2015年12月期间,共有2062例肾小球滤过率<60 mL/min / 1.73 m2的急性心肌梗死患者入选韩国急性心肌梗死登记处。主要终点是急性心肌梗死发生后2年主要心脑血管不良事件(mace)的综合。mace定义为全因死亡、复发性心肌梗死、血运重建术和中风。进行倾向评分匹配和Cox比例风险回归。529名接受亲水他汀类药物治疗的患者与529名接受亲脂他汀类药物治疗的患者相匹配。他汀类药物等效剂量在两组间无差异。在倾向评分匹配的人群中,接受亲水他汀类药物治疗的患者mace累积发生率、全因死亡率和复发性心肌梗死显著降低(均P<0.05)。在多变量Cox回归分析中,接受亲水他汀类药物治疗的患者发生复合mace(危险比[HR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55-0.90])、全因死亡率(HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49-0.93])和心肌梗死复发(HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.21-0.73])的风险较低,但血运重建和缺血性卒中的风险较低。结论:在一项倾向评分匹配的急性心肌梗死后肾功能损害患者观察队列中,亲水他汀类药物治疗与亲脂他汀类药物相比,与更低的mace风险和全因死亡率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Survival in Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Active Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study Treatment of Slow‐Flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow‐Mediated Hyperemia: The Randomized RAIN‐FLOW Study Predicting Arterial Thrombotic Events Following Peripheral Revascularization Using Objective Viscoelastic Data Safety of Catheter Ablation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Amyloidosis Corin Missense Variants, Blood Pressure, and Hypertension in 11 322 Black Individuals: Insights From REGARDS and the Jackson Heart Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1