The Resected Tumour Volume of the Specimen as a Marker of the Quality of the Transurethral Resection in T1 Urinary Bladder Cancer

J. Staffan, Olsson Hans
{"title":"The Resected Tumour Volume of the Specimen as a Marker of the Quality of the Transurethral Resection in T1 Urinary Bladder Cancer","authors":"J. Staffan, Olsson Hans","doi":"10.23937/2378-3419/1410123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To study the resected volume (RV) and the resected tumour volume (RTV) in the microscopic examination of the TUR specimen in relation to tumour size, clinical variables and outcome. Materials and methods: This prospectively performed population-based study included all patients in the Southeast Healthcare Region in Sweden with T1 UBC registered in the period 1992-2001, inclusive. RV, RTV and important clinic-pathological variables were studied. All patients had T1 tumours including detrusor muscle at the histopathological examination. Median values for RV and RTV were cut-off points for dichotomisation and 3 cm was the cut-off point for tumour size measured at TUR. Recurrence and progression were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves with Log-rank test and Cox Proportional Hazards analysis. Results: Out of 211 patients we observed low RV in 112 (53%), low RTV in 113 (54%) and tumour size > 3 cm in 109 (52%). Patients with tumour size > 3 cm and low RV had shorter time to recurrence and progression compared to those with high RV (p = 0.006 and p = 0.087, respectively) and this was also the case when comparing patients with low RTV versus high RTV (p < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). Conclusions: Patients with tumours > 3 cm and low RV or low RTV at TUR for T1 UBC are at higher risk for recurrence or progression, indicating an insufficient TUR. Extensive SLR is particularly important for these patients. RV and RTV might also be used as markers to monitor the quality of the TUR to improve treatment outcome.","PeriodicalId":13873,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cancer and clinical research","volume":"21 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cancer and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3419/1410123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the resected volume (RV) and the resected tumour volume (RTV) in the microscopic examination of the TUR specimen in relation to tumour size, clinical variables and outcome. Materials and methods: This prospectively performed population-based study included all patients in the Southeast Healthcare Region in Sweden with T1 UBC registered in the period 1992-2001, inclusive. RV, RTV and important clinic-pathological variables were studied. All patients had T1 tumours including detrusor muscle at the histopathological examination. Median values for RV and RTV were cut-off points for dichotomisation and 3 cm was the cut-off point for tumour size measured at TUR. Recurrence and progression were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves with Log-rank test and Cox Proportional Hazards analysis. Results: Out of 211 patients we observed low RV in 112 (53%), low RTV in 113 (54%) and tumour size > 3 cm in 109 (52%). Patients with tumour size > 3 cm and low RV had shorter time to recurrence and progression compared to those with high RV (p = 0.006 and p = 0.087, respectively) and this was also the case when comparing patients with low RTV versus high RTV (p < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). Conclusions: Patients with tumours > 3 cm and low RV or low RTV at TUR for T1 UBC are at higher risk for recurrence or progression, indicating an insufficient TUR. Extensive SLR is particularly important for these patients. RV and RTV might also be used as markers to monitor the quality of the TUR to improve treatment outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
T1型膀胱癌经尿道切除肿瘤标本体积作为肿瘤切除质量的标志
目的:探讨TUR标本显微检查中切除体积(RV)和切除肿瘤体积(RTV)与肿瘤大小、临床指标及预后的关系。材料和方法:这项前瞻性的基于人群的研究纳入了1992-2001年期间瑞典东南医疗保健区登记的T1 UBC的所有患者。研究RV、RTV及重要临床病理指标。所有患者病理检查均有T1肿瘤,包括逼尿肌。RV和RTV的中位数是二分法的分界点,3cm是TUR测量肿瘤大小的分界点。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线、Log-rank检验和Cox比例风险分析分析复发和进展情况。结果:在211例患者中,我们观察到112例(53%)低RV, 113例(54%)低RTV, 109例(52%)肿瘤大小> 3cm。肿瘤大小> 3cm和低RV的患者与高RV的患者相比,复发和进展时间更短(p = 0.006和p = 0.087分别),当比较低RTV和高RTV的患者时也是如此(p < 0.001和p = 0.017分别)。结论:肿瘤> 3cm且T1期UBC TUR时RV或RTV较低的患者复发或进展的风险较高,表明TUR不足。广泛的单反对这些患者尤为重要。RV和RTV也可作为监测TUR质量的指标,以改善治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological Study of Penile Cancer in Northeast Brazil Punicic Acid Inhibits Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis in Human MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy vs. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Dosimetric Study Alterations of Serum Lipids Profiles in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers Intercalary Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Long Bone Defects of the Lower Extremity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1