Supply network resilience learning: An exploratory data analytics study

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT DECISION SCIENCES Pub Date : 2021-02-14 DOI:10.1111/deci.12513
Kedong Chen, Yuhong Li, Kevin Linderman
{"title":"Supply network resilience learning: An exploratory data analytics study","authors":"Kedong Chen,&nbsp;Yuhong Li,&nbsp;Kevin Linderman","doi":"10.1111/deci.12513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When a supplier experiences a disruption, it <i>learns</i> how to better prevent and recover from future disruptions. As suppliers learn to become more resilient, the overall supply network also learns to become more resilient. This research draws on the organizational learning literature to introduce the concept of <i>supply network resilience learning</i>, which we define as the improvement of supply network resilience when suppliers learn from their own disruptions. The analysis integrates agent-based modeling, experimental design, data analytics, and analytical modeling to investigate how supplier learning improves supply network learning. We examine how two types of supplier learning, namely, <i>learning-to-prevent</i> and <i>learning-to-recover</i>, affect supply network learning. The results show that suppliers' <i>learning-to-prevent</i> results in a disruption-free supply network when time approaches infinity. However, the results differ across a more realistic finite time horizon. In this setting, <i>learning-to-recover</i> improves network learning when suppliers face a lower chance of disruption. The analysis also shows that centrally located suppliers enhance network learning, except when the risk of a disruption is high and the chance of diffusing a disruption to another supplier is high. In this setting, noncentral suppliers become more critical to supply network learning. This research provides a framework that will help practitioners understand the contingencies that influence the effect of supplier learning on the overall supply network resilience learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"53 1","pages":"8-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/deci.12513","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

When a supplier experiences a disruption, it learns how to better prevent and recover from future disruptions. As suppliers learn to become more resilient, the overall supply network also learns to become more resilient. This research draws on the organizational learning literature to introduce the concept of supply network resilience learning, which we define as the improvement of supply network resilience when suppliers learn from their own disruptions. The analysis integrates agent-based modeling, experimental design, data analytics, and analytical modeling to investigate how supplier learning improves supply network learning. We examine how two types of supplier learning, namely, learning-to-prevent and learning-to-recover, affect supply network learning. The results show that suppliers' learning-to-prevent results in a disruption-free supply network when time approaches infinity. However, the results differ across a more realistic finite time horizon. In this setting, learning-to-recover improves network learning when suppliers face a lower chance of disruption. The analysis also shows that centrally located suppliers enhance network learning, except when the risk of a disruption is high and the chance of diffusing a disruption to another supplier is high. In this setting, noncentral suppliers become more critical to supply network learning. This research provides a framework that will help practitioners understand the contingencies that influence the effect of supplier learning on the overall supply network resilience learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应网络弹性学习:探索性数据分析研究
当供应商经历中断时,它会学习如何更好地预防和从未来的中断中恢复。随着供应商学会变得更有弹性,整个供应网络也学会变得更有弹性。本研究借鉴组织学习文献,引入供应网络弹性学习的概念,我们将其定义为供应商从自身的中断中学习时供应网络弹性的提高。该分析集成了基于代理的建模、实验设计、数据分析和分析建模,以调查供应商学习如何改善供应网络学习。我们研究了两种类型的供应商学习,即学习预防和学习恢复,如何影响供应网络学习。结果表明,当时间趋近于无穷大时,供应商的学习预防导致了一个无中断的供应网络。然而,在更现实的有限时间范围内,结果会有所不同。在这种情况下,当供应商面临较低的中断机会时,学习恢复可以改善网络学习。分析还表明,除非中断的风险很高,并且将中断扩散到另一个供应商的机会很高,否则集中部署的供应商可以增强网络学习。在这种情况下,非中心供应商对供应网络学习变得更加关键。本研究提供了一个框架,帮助从业者理解影响供应商学习对整体供应网络弹性学习影响的偶然性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information IN THIS ISSUE Issue Information In this issue Explanation seeking and anomalous recommendation adherence in human-to-human versus human-to-artificial intelligence interactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1