Best Practices in Liver Biopsy Histologic Assessment for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Trials: Expert Opinion

GastroHep Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI:10.1155/2022/3538103
C. Filozof, C. Lackner, M. Romero‐Gomez, J. Imperial, R. McGee, Lara Dimick‐Santos, O. Cummings, Cynthia E. Behling, Troy Johnson, A. Sanyal
{"title":"Best Practices in Liver Biopsy Histologic Assessment for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Trials: Expert Opinion","authors":"C. Filozof, C. Lackner, M. Romero‐Gomez, J. Imperial, R. McGee, Lara Dimick‐Santos, O. Cummings, Cynthia E. Behling, Troy Johnson, A. Sanyal","doi":"10.1155/2022/3538103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. In most clinical trials focusing on precirrhotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a liver biopsy is required for confirmation of diagnosis, staging fibrosis, and grading steatohepatitis activity. Reliance on the biopsy, both as a requisite for study entry, as well as for a primary endpoint in clinical trials, poses several challenges that need to be overcome: patient reluctance to undergo the procedure; potential sampling error; concern regarding the handling, processing and shipping of the biopsy of the biopsy material to the central reader(s); and the degree of pathologists’ intra- and interobserver variability in biopsy interpretation. Aims. To provide recommendations for improving the liver biopsy process in order to maximize the accuracy of its histological interpretation in NASH clinical trials. Methods and Results. These recommendations were created by an expert panel of participants from the United States and European Union who met multiple times and reached alignment through review of available data and their individual clinical experiences. The recommendations include the methodology for biopsy procedure, central lab and pathology processing of the specimen, and recommendations to minimize the intra- and intersubject variability. Finally, we are discussing digital pathology technology and machine learning applications as important additions to enhance liver biopsy interpretation.Conclusions. Liver biopsy poses multiple challenges in clinical trials in NASH, and there is a need to standardize the processes to maximize accuracy and minimize variability. Many questions remained unanswered due to limited available data. New evolving modalities may help in the future, but generation of robust data is warranted.","PeriodicalId":12480,"journal":{"name":"GastroHep","volume":"79 1-2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GastroHep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3538103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background. In most clinical trials focusing on precirrhotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a liver biopsy is required for confirmation of diagnosis, staging fibrosis, and grading steatohepatitis activity. Reliance on the biopsy, both as a requisite for study entry, as well as for a primary endpoint in clinical trials, poses several challenges that need to be overcome: patient reluctance to undergo the procedure; potential sampling error; concern regarding the handling, processing and shipping of the biopsy of the biopsy material to the central reader(s); and the degree of pathologists’ intra- and interobserver variability in biopsy interpretation. Aims. To provide recommendations for improving the liver biopsy process in order to maximize the accuracy of its histological interpretation in NASH clinical trials. Methods and Results. These recommendations were created by an expert panel of participants from the United States and European Union who met multiple times and reached alignment through review of available data and their individual clinical experiences. The recommendations include the methodology for biopsy procedure, central lab and pathology processing of the specimen, and recommendations to minimize the intra- and intersubject variability. Finally, we are discussing digital pathology technology and machine learning applications as important additions to enhance liver biopsy interpretation.Conclusions. Liver biopsy poses multiple challenges in clinical trials in NASH, and there is a need to standardize the processes to maximize accuracy and minimize variability. Many questions remained unanswered due to limited available data. New evolving modalities may help in the future, but generation of robust data is warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非酒精性脂肪性肝炎临床试验肝活检组织学评估的最佳实践:专家意见
背景。在大多数关注肝硬化前非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)的临床试验中,需要肝活检来确认诊断、纤维化分期和脂肪性肝炎活动分级。对活检的依赖,无论是作为研究进入的必要条件,还是作为临床试验的主要终点,都提出了几个需要克服的挑战:患者不愿意接受手术;潜在抽样误差;对活组织检查材料的处理、加工和运送到中心阅读器的关注;病理学家在活检解释中的内部和观察者之间的差异程度。目标为改善肝活检过程提供建议,以便在NASH临床试验中最大限度地提高其组织学解释的准确性。方法与结果。这些建议是由来自美国和欧盟的参与者组成的专家小组提出的,他们多次会面,并通过审查现有数据和他们的个人临床经验达成一致。建议包括活检程序的方法、中心实验室和标本的病理处理,以及尽量减少主体内部和主体间差异的建议。最后,我们讨论了数字病理学技术和机器学习应用作为增强肝活检解释的重要补充。肝活检在NASH的临床试验中面临多重挑战,需要标准化该过程以最大限度地提高准确性和减少变异性。由于现有数据有限,许多问题仍未得到解答。新的发展模式可能在未来有所帮助,但生成可靠的数据是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hepatitis D Virus Status Among People With Hepatitis B Virus Infection: A Disconnect Between Guidelines and Practice The Use of Antibiotics for the Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: A Retrospective Review and Quality Improvement Study Management of Antithrombotic Agents During Emergency Endoscopy for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis High Technical Success Rate of Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation Reduces Surgical Requirement for Patients With Stricturing Crohn’s Disease The Suitability of Stool Antigen Testing in the Detection of Helicobacter pylori in a Regional and Rural Area of Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1