Characteristics of women who present for abortion towards the end of the mid-trimester in Scotland: national audit 2013–2014

S. Cameron, J. Riddell, Audrey Brown, A. Thomson, C. Melville, G. Flett, L. Caird, George Laird
{"title":"Characteristics of women who present for abortion towards the end of the mid-trimester in Scotland: national audit 2013–2014","authors":"S. Cameron, J. Riddell, Audrey Brown, A. Thomson, C. Melville, G. Flett, L. Caird, George Laird","doi":"10.3109/13625187.2015.1111326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives: Women in Scotland who request an abortion (for non-medical reasons) within the legal gestational limit (up to 24 weeks) but beyond the gestational limit of all abortion facilities in Scotland (only up to 20 weeks) must travel to England if they wish to terminate the pregnancy. We wished to determine the number and characteristics of women presenting at ≥16 weeks’ gestation for abortion, and compare the characteristics of those proceeding to abortion with those continuing the pregnancy. Methods: Over a period of 12 months we conducted a prospective audit of women presenting at ≥16 weeks’ gestation to abortion services throughout Scotland. The characteristics of women proceeding to abortion and those continuing the pregnancy were compared. Results: A total of 267 women presented for abortion at ≥16 weeks’ gestation. Their median age was 22 years (range 14 to 47 years); 231 were from deprived areas (86.5%), 128 (47.9%) already had a child and 73 (27.3%) had previously undergone abortion. A total of 175 women (65.5%) proceeded to abortion, locally (n = 125; 46.8%) or in England (50; 18.7%). Those at ≥20 weeks’ gestation were statistically more likely to continue the pregnancy than those at earlier gestations (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Relatively few women present for abortion in Scotland at ≥16 weeks’ gestation. Those who are over 20 weeks’ gestation and would need to travel to England for abortion are more likely to continue the pregnancy, suggesting that travel is a barrier to accessing legal abortion for this group of women. Provision of abortion services up to 24 weeks’ gestation should be considered within Scotland.","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"60 1","pages":"183 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2015.1111326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: Women in Scotland who request an abortion (for non-medical reasons) within the legal gestational limit (up to 24 weeks) but beyond the gestational limit of all abortion facilities in Scotland (only up to 20 weeks) must travel to England if they wish to terminate the pregnancy. We wished to determine the number and characteristics of women presenting at ≥16 weeks’ gestation for abortion, and compare the characteristics of those proceeding to abortion with those continuing the pregnancy. Methods: Over a period of 12 months we conducted a prospective audit of women presenting at ≥16 weeks’ gestation to abortion services throughout Scotland. The characteristics of women proceeding to abortion and those continuing the pregnancy were compared. Results: A total of 267 women presented for abortion at ≥16 weeks’ gestation. Their median age was 22 years (range 14 to 47 years); 231 were from deprived areas (86.5%), 128 (47.9%) already had a child and 73 (27.3%) had previously undergone abortion. A total of 175 women (65.5%) proceeded to abortion, locally (n = 125; 46.8%) or in England (50; 18.7%). Those at ≥20 weeks’ gestation were statistically more likely to continue the pregnancy than those at earlier gestations (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Relatively few women present for abortion in Scotland at ≥16 weeks’ gestation. Those who are over 20 weeks’ gestation and would need to travel to England for abortion are more likely to continue the pregnancy, suggesting that travel is a barrier to accessing legal abortion for this group of women. Provision of abortion services up to 24 weeks’ gestation should be considered within Scotland.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏格兰妊娠中期末期前来堕胎妇女的特征:2013-2014年国家审计
【摘要】目的:苏格兰妇女在法定妊娠限制(最多24周)内要求堕胎(非医疗原因),但超过苏格兰所有堕胎设施的妊娠限制(最多20周),如果她们希望终止妊娠,必须前往英格兰。我们希望确定在妊娠≥16周出现流产的妇女的数量和特征,并比较那些进行流产的妇女和那些继续妊娠的妇女的特征。方法:在12个月的时间里,我们对苏格兰妊娠≥16周的妇女进行了前瞻性审计。比较了堕胎妇女和继续妊娠妇女的特点。结果:共有267名妇女在妊娠≥16周流产。年龄中位数为22岁(14 ~ 47岁);贫困地区231人(86.5%),已生育128人(47.9%),堕胎73人(27.3%)。175名妇女(65.5%)就地流产(n = 125;46.8%)或在英国(50%;18.7%)。妊娠≥20周的妇女继续妊娠的可能性高于妊娠早期的妇女(p < 0.001)。结论:在苏格兰,妊娠≥16周流产的妇女相对较少。那些怀孕超过20周,需要前往英国堕胎的妇女更有可能继续怀孕,这表明旅行是这群妇女获得合法堕胎的障碍。应考虑在苏格兰境内提供妊娠24周以内的堕胎服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain relief during intrauterine device placement in nulligravid women with both oral ketorolac and an analgesic: a double-blinded randomised trial Legal abortion requests and outcomes for women when the law is restrictive – experience from a referral centre in south-eastern Brazil ‘Do I want children later in life?’ Reproductive intentions of 1700 adolescents Oestrogens in oral contraception: considerations for tailoring prescription to women’s needs Prevalence of high-risk HPV and cervical dysplasia in IUD users and controls: a cross sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1