Comparison of nutritional value of different ruminant milks in human nutrition

A. Arrichiello, G. Auriemma, F. Sarubbi
{"title":"Comparison of nutritional value of different ruminant milks in human nutrition","authors":"A. Arrichiello, G. Auriemma, F. Sarubbi","doi":"10.3892/ijfn.2022.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The present study was conducted on milk samples from 30 Italian Mediterranean buffaloes, and as many goats, sheep and cattle. Milk samples were subjected to chem‑ ical‑nutritional analysis and compared with commercially available milk samples. In the experiments, the management conditions could have influenced this parameter, determining the observed values. The higher fat content in sheep's milk differed significantly from that in the milk of the other animals analyzed. A higher lactose content was found in the milk of buffaloes and sheep, than in cows and goats. The highest cholesterol content was observed in cow and buffalo milk. These differences were statistically significant. To avoid exces‑ sive cholesterol intake, it is necessary to pay attention to both the quantity and quality of fats contained in food, bearing in mind that the introduction of large quantities of dairy products in the diet can cause a significant intake in cholesterol levels. Furthermore, when selecting the type of milk to be consumed, it is necessary to consider that the amount of total cholesterol is dependent on both the animal of origin and on the integrity of the lipid fraction. To complete the study, a chemical‑nutritional analysis of milk samples normally marketed, both of vegetable and animal origin, was also included. Observing the results, some differences appear evident in the chemical‑nutritional composition of goat and cow milk compared to the raw milk analyzed. In particular, goat's milk has a higher percentage of lipids. However, the differences observed herein were not significant and could be explained by the manufacturing process the samples were subjected to from the stable to the packaging industry. From the results obtained in the present study in the compositional analyses performed, and as also obtained from previous studies, it was found that sheep and goat milk, in particular, may be a valid substitute for cow's milk.","PeriodicalId":93109,"journal":{"name":"International journal of functional nutrition","volume":"71 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of functional nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/ijfn.2022.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

. The present study was conducted on milk samples from 30 Italian Mediterranean buffaloes, and as many goats, sheep and cattle. Milk samples were subjected to chem‑ ical‑nutritional analysis and compared with commercially available milk samples. In the experiments, the management conditions could have influenced this parameter, determining the observed values. The higher fat content in sheep's milk differed significantly from that in the milk of the other animals analyzed. A higher lactose content was found in the milk of buffaloes and sheep, than in cows and goats. The highest cholesterol content was observed in cow and buffalo milk. These differences were statistically significant. To avoid exces‑ sive cholesterol intake, it is necessary to pay attention to both the quantity and quality of fats contained in food, bearing in mind that the introduction of large quantities of dairy products in the diet can cause a significant intake in cholesterol levels. Furthermore, when selecting the type of milk to be consumed, it is necessary to consider that the amount of total cholesterol is dependent on both the animal of origin and on the integrity of the lipid fraction. To complete the study, a chemical‑nutritional analysis of milk samples normally marketed, both of vegetable and animal origin, was also included. Observing the results, some differences appear evident in the chemical‑nutritional composition of goat and cow milk compared to the raw milk analyzed. In particular, goat's milk has a higher percentage of lipids. However, the differences observed herein were not significant and could be explained by the manufacturing process the samples were subjected to from the stable to the packaging industry. From the results obtained in the present study in the compositional analyses performed, and as also obtained from previous studies, it was found that sheep and goat milk, in particular, may be a valid substitute for cow's milk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同反刍动物奶在人体营养中的营养价值比较
。目前的研究是对30头意大利地中海水牛以及同样多的山羊、绵羊和牛的牛奶样本进行的。对牛奶样品进行了化学营养分析,并与市售牛奶样品进行了比较。在实验中,管理条件可能会影响该参数,从而决定观测值。绵羊奶中较高的脂肪含量与所分析的其他动物奶中的脂肪含量明显不同。在水牛和绵羊的牛奶中发现的乳糖含量高于奶牛和山羊。牛奶和水牛奶中胆固醇含量最高。这些差异具有统计学意义。为了避免摄入过多的胆固醇,有必要注意食物中所含脂肪的数量和质量,同时要记住,在饮食中大量摄入乳制品会导致胆固醇水平大幅上升。此外,在选择要食用的牛奶类型时,有必要考虑到总胆固醇的含量取决于动物的来源和脂质部分的完整性。为了完成这项研究,还对通常销售的蔬菜和动物来源的牛奶样本进行了化学营养分析。观察结果,与所分析的原料奶相比,羊奶和牛奶的化学营养成分有一些明显的差异。特别是,羊奶的脂质含量更高。然而,这里观察到的差异并不显著,可以用样品从稳定到包装工业的制造过程来解释。从本研究中进行的成分分析得出的结果,以及从以前的研究中得出的结果,发现绵羊和山羊奶,特别是,可能是牛奶的有效替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coffee extracts and caffeine upregulate the expression of the immune checkpoint factors, PD‑1 and PD‑L1 Antioxidant and anti‑inflammatory effects of a mixture of propolis, red bean and tomato extracts An antioxidant ‘database’ for local food products from the Serres region in Greece Determination of the polyphenolic content and the antioxidant activities of four indigenous Greek red and white wine varieties Evaluation of the efficacy of the combination of Citrus aurantium, Cistus creticus and Olea europaea leaf extract on the lipid profiles of individuals with marginally elevated lipid levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1