Effect of Fluid Resuscitation Strategies for Obese Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review.

Yijun Zhang, Minjie Wang, Zongqing Lu, Min Yang
{"title":"Effect of Fluid Resuscitation Strategies for Obese Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Yijun Zhang,&nbsp;Minjie Wang,&nbsp;Zongqing Lu,&nbsp;Min Yang","doi":"10.1007/s44231-022-00019-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (2021) recommended, patients with sepsis should be given a liquid infusion of 30 ml/kg (ideal body weight). However, the strategy may result in insufficient resuscitation for obese patients with sepsis. Therefore, we conducted a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of the initial resuscitation strategy in obese sepsis patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A computer search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and other databases collected cohort studies from the beginning of the survey to December 2021 to include articles evaluating initial resuscitation strategies for sepsis-obese patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the six studies included, five used ideal body weight infusion strategies, and three used actual body weight infusion strategies. Differences in fluid volume were observed between the two strategies, but no significant difference was observed in the mortality of obese sepsis patients. In addition, there may be an infusion strategy other than the above two infusion methods, and the safety and efficacy of the new infusion strategy are unclear. The obesity paradox has been observed in most infusion strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The association between obesity and infusion strategy has rarely been investigated in patients with sepsis and septic shock, and the existing results are conflicting. The risk of bias in all included studies was moderate or high. Before providing broad recommendations on the optimal first resuscitation approach to lower the chance of mortality, further clinical trials, and prospective research need to be done.</p>","PeriodicalId":73403,"journal":{"name":"Intensive care research","volume":"3 1","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9610334/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive care research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44231-022-00019-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: As the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (2021) recommended, patients with sepsis should be given a liquid infusion of 30 ml/kg (ideal body weight). However, the strategy may result in insufficient resuscitation for obese patients with sepsis. Therefore, we conducted a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of the initial resuscitation strategy in obese sepsis patients.

Materials and methods: A computer search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and other databases collected cohort studies from the beginning of the survey to December 2021 to include articles evaluating initial resuscitation strategies for sepsis-obese patients.

Results: Of the six studies included, five used ideal body weight infusion strategies, and three used actual body weight infusion strategies. Differences in fluid volume were observed between the two strategies, but no significant difference was observed in the mortality of obese sepsis patients. In addition, there may be an infusion strategy other than the above two infusion methods, and the safety and efficacy of the new infusion strategy are unclear. The obesity paradox has been observed in most infusion strategies.

Conclusion: The association between obesity and infusion strategy has rarely been investigated in patients with sepsis and septic shock, and the existing results are conflicting. The risk of bias in all included studies was moderate or high. Before providing broad recommendations on the optimal first resuscitation approach to lower the chance of mortality, further clinical trials, and prospective research need to be done.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液体复苏策略对肥胖脓毒症和感染性休克患者的影响:一项系统综述。
目的:根据生存脓毒症运动(2021)的建议,脓毒症患者应给予30 ml/kg(理想体重)的液体输注。然而,该策略可能导致肥胖脓毒症患者复苏不足。因此,我们对肥胖脓毒症患者初始复苏策略的有效性进行了系统的评估。材料和方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和其他数据库,收集了从调查开始到2021年12月的队列研究,包括评估败血症肥胖患者初始复苏策略的文章。结果:纳入的6项研究中,5项采用理想体重输注策略,3项采用实际体重输注策略。两种策略在体液量上存在差异,但在肥胖脓毒症患者的死亡率上无显著差异。此外,可能存在上述两种输注方法之外的输注策略,新输注策略的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。肥胖悖论已经在大多数输注策略中被观察到。结论:肥胖与输注策略之间的关系在脓毒症和感染性休克患者中很少被研究,现有的结果也相互矛盾。所有纳入研究的偏倚风险均为中等或较高。在提供关于降低死亡率的最佳首次复苏方法的广泛建议之前,需要进行进一步的临床试验和前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Urgency: A Narrative Review on the Critical Demand for Robust Outcome Measures in Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Effects of Oral Versus Intravenous Linezolid Administration on Treatment Effect and Incidence of Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Severe Infection Septic Shock, Tubular Necrosis, and Central Diabetes Insipidus: A Challenging Syndrome Safety and Feasibility of Electrocardiogram-Guided Tip Positioning Combined with Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Performed in Severe Brain Injury Patients Guidelines for Early Mobilisation of Intubated Patients in Intensive Care Unit: Clinical Pathology Evidence-Base Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1