Trabecular Bone Score as a Risk Factor of Major Osteoporotic Fracture in Postmenopausal Women: The First Study in Thailand.

Atiporn Therdyothin, Tanawat Amphansap
{"title":"Trabecular Bone Score as a Risk Factor of Major Osteoporotic Fracture in Postmenopausal Women: The First Study in Thailand.","authors":"Atiporn Therdyothin, Tanawat Amphansap","doi":"10.6118/jmm.22011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the trabecular bone score (TBS) between Thai postmenopausal women with and without major osteoporotic fracture, and to determine whether TBS is associated with fracture risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All postmenopausal women sent for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the Police General Hospital were retrospectively recruited. The hospital's online database and radiographs were reviewed to collect information on underlying disease, medication, previous fractures, bone mineral density, and trabecular bone score. Patients with anti-osteoporotic medication use, skeletal malignancy, fracture from high-energy trauma, and uninterpretable DXA images were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 407 Thai postmenopausal women were enrolled. They were divided into 292 women without fractures and 115 women with major osteoporotic fractures. The fracture group was older (73.36 ± 9.95 vs. 66.00 ± 8.58, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and had lower serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (23.28 ± 9.09 vs. 26.44 ± 9.20, <i>P</i> = 0.023). The mean TBS was lower in the fracture group, compared to the non-fracture group (1.244 ± 0.101 vs. 1.272 ± 0.099, <i>P</i> = 0.011). The subgroup analysis resulted in noticeably lower TBS in spine fracture, but not other fracture sites. The odds ratio of fracture was 1.355 (<i>P</i> = 0.013) for a decrease in one standard deviation of TBS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TBS was significantly lower in postmenopausal women having fractures with an odd ratio of 1.355 (<i>P</i> = 0.013) per SD decrease in TBS. Categorizing by fracture sites, TBS was only found to be noticeably lower in the lumbar spine despite similar lumbar spine bone mineral density.</p>","PeriodicalId":16410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Menopausal Medicine","volume":"28 3","pages":"112-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/bf/jmm-28-112.PMC9843030.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Menopausal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6118/jmm.22011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the trabecular bone score (TBS) between Thai postmenopausal women with and without major osteoporotic fracture, and to determine whether TBS is associated with fracture risk.

Methods: All postmenopausal women sent for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the Police General Hospital were retrospectively recruited. The hospital's online database and radiographs were reviewed to collect information on underlying disease, medication, previous fractures, bone mineral density, and trabecular bone score. Patients with anti-osteoporotic medication use, skeletal malignancy, fracture from high-energy trauma, and uninterpretable DXA images were excluded.

Results: A total of 407 Thai postmenopausal women were enrolled. They were divided into 292 women without fractures and 115 women with major osteoporotic fractures. The fracture group was older (73.36 ± 9.95 vs. 66.00 ± 8.58, P < 0.001) and had lower serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (23.28 ± 9.09 vs. 26.44 ± 9.20, P = 0.023). The mean TBS was lower in the fracture group, compared to the non-fracture group (1.244 ± 0.101 vs. 1.272 ± 0.099, P = 0.011). The subgroup analysis resulted in noticeably lower TBS in spine fracture, but not other fracture sites. The odds ratio of fracture was 1.355 (P = 0.013) for a decrease in one standard deviation of TBS.

Conclusions: TBS was significantly lower in postmenopausal women having fractures with an odd ratio of 1.355 (P = 0.013) per SD decrease in TBS. Categorizing by fracture sites, TBS was only found to be noticeably lower in the lumbar spine despite similar lumbar spine bone mineral density.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨小梁评分作为绝经后妇女发生重大骨质疏松性骨折的风险因素:泰国首次研究。
目的比较患有和未患有重大骨质疏松性骨折的泰国绝经后妇女的骨小梁评分(TBS),并确定TBS是否与骨折风险相关:方法:回顾性招募了在警察总医院接受双能 X 射线吸收测定(DXA)的所有绝经后妇女。对医院的在线数据库和放射照片进行审查,以收集有关基础疾病、药物治疗、既往骨折、骨矿密度和骨小梁评分的信息。使用抗骨质疏松药物、骨骼恶性肿瘤、高能量创伤导致骨折以及无法解读 DXA 图像的患者被排除在外:共有 407 名泰国绝经后妇女参加了研究。结果:共招募了 407 名泰国绝经后妇女,她们被分为 292 名无骨折妇女和 115 名严重骨质疏松性骨折妇女。骨折组年龄较大(73.36 ± 9.95 vs. 66.00 ± 8.58,P < 0.001),血清 25- 羟维生素 D 水平较低(23.28 ± 9.09 vs. 26.44 ± 9.20,P = 0.023)。与非骨折组相比,骨折组的平均 TBS 更低(1.244 ± 0.101 vs. 1.272 ± 0.099,P = 0.011)。亚组分析结果显示,脊柱骨折组的 TBS 明显低于非骨折组。TBS每降低一个标准差,骨折的几率比为1.355(P = 0.013):结论:绝经后骨折妇女的 TBS 明显降低,TBS 每降低一个标准差的奇数比为 1.355(P = 0.013)。按骨折部位分类,尽管腰椎骨矿物质密度相似,但只有腰椎的TBS明显较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between Fractures and Low Muscle Mass in Korean Menopausal Women: Data from Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey (2010-2011). Minireview: A Need for an Adequate Diet Program for Postmenopausal Women with Obesity in the Republic of Korea. Correlation of Sarcopenic Obesity on Various Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Fracture Risk in Mid-Aged Korean Women. Combination of Soy Isoflavones, 8-Prenylnaringenin and Melatonin Improves Hot Flashes and Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women: Flavie Study. Body Composition and Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Surgical Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1