Eosinophilia attention, diagnosis, treatment, and awareness in physicians: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20406223221146938
Bigui Chen, Yu Fu, Zhufeng Wang, Qiuping Rong, Qingling Zhang, Jiaxing Xie, Xuetao Kong, Mei Jiang
{"title":"Eosinophilia attention, diagnosis, treatment, and awareness in physicians: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Bigui Chen,&nbsp;Yu Fu,&nbsp;Zhufeng Wang,&nbsp;Qiuping Rong,&nbsp;Qingling Zhang,&nbsp;Jiaxing Xie,&nbsp;Xuetao Kong,&nbsp;Mei Jiang","doi":"10.1177/20406223221146938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with incidental eosinophilia is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. But it remains challenging to diagnose and treat owing to its complex etiology. The awareness of physicians and the strategies of diagnosis and treatment toward eosinophilia are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate attention, diagnosis, treatment, and awareness of eosinophilia among physicians, as well as factors influencing clinical practice, and to find ways to improve the efficacy of this disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 to 4 June 2021 in a tertiary hospital. Self-administered and validated electronic questionnaire was used to investigate the attention toward eosinophilia, the strategies of diagnosis and treatment, and the awareness in physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 607 valid questionnaires were collected, with a response rate of 84.5%. Among the responders, 65.4% of physicians claimed to be familiar with patients with eosinophilia but only 11.0% of them had read the relevant guidelines or expert consensus. Among 207 physicians who had ever diagnosed patients with eosinophilia, only 19.4% had performed detailed examinations. The accuracy of awareness questions was 1.6-53.5%, and only 26.5% of physicians had high levels of awareness. An increase in the awareness level of up to 2.82 folds was seen among physicians with factors such as job title, encountering patients with eosinophilia, linking patients' conditions to peripheral blood eosinophil count, and paying attention to guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted the importance of raising awareness and knowledge of eosinophilia among physicians in China. More works on education about eosinophilia guideline are needed, which may help physicians make decision with more benefits to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22960,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/a2/10.1177_20406223221146938.PMC9880572.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223221146938","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Patients with incidental eosinophilia is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. But it remains challenging to diagnose and treat owing to its complex etiology. The awareness of physicians and the strategies of diagnosis and treatment toward eosinophilia are still unclear.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate attention, diagnosis, treatment, and awareness of eosinophilia among physicians, as well as factors influencing clinical practice, and to find ways to improve the efficacy of this disease.

Design: This is a cross-sectional survey.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 to 4 June 2021 in a tertiary hospital. Self-administered and validated electronic questionnaire was used to investigate the attention toward eosinophilia, the strategies of diagnosis and treatment, and the awareness in physicians.

Results: A total of 607 valid questionnaires were collected, with a response rate of 84.5%. Among the responders, 65.4% of physicians claimed to be familiar with patients with eosinophilia but only 11.0% of them had read the relevant guidelines or expert consensus. Among 207 physicians who had ever diagnosed patients with eosinophilia, only 19.4% had performed detailed examinations. The accuracy of awareness questions was 1.6-53.5%, and only 26.5% of physicians had high levels of awareness. An increase in the awareness level of up to 2.82 folds was seen among physicians with factors such as job title, encountering patients with eosinophilia, linking patients' conditions to peripheral blood eosinophil count, and paying attention to guidelines.

Conclusion: This study highlighted the importance of raising awareness and knowledge of eosinophilia among physicians in China. More works on education about eosinophilia guideline are needed, which may help physicians make decision with more benefits to patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗜酸性粒细胞增多症的注意,诊断,治疗和意识在医生:横断面调查。
背景:偶发性嗜酸性粒细胞增多症在临床上越来越常见。但由于其复杂的病因,诊断和治疗仍然具有挑战性。医生对嗜酸性粒细胞增多症的认识和诊断和治疗策略尚不清楚。目的:评价医生对嗜酸性粒细胞增多症的重视程度、诊断、治疗、认知及影响临床实践的因素,探讨提高该病疗效的方法。设计:这是一个横断面调查。方法:于2021年6月1日至4日在某三级医院进行横断面研究。采用自我填写的电子问卷,调查医生对嗜酸性粒细胞增多症的关注程度、诊疗策略和认知程度。结果:共回收有效问卷607份,回复率为84.5%。在应答者中,65.4%的医生声称熟悉嗜酸性粒细胞增多症患者,但只有11.0%的医生阅读过相关指南或专家共识。在207名诊断过嗜酸性粒细胞增多症患者的医生中,只有19.4%的医生做过详细的检查。认知问题的正确率为1.6 ~ 53.5%,仅有26.5%的医生有较高的认知水平。在职称、遇到嗜酸性粒细胞增多的患者、将患者的病情与外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数联系起来、关注指南等因素的影响下,医生对嗜酸性粒细胞增多的认识水平提高了2.82倍。结论:本研究强调了提高中国医生对嗜酸性粒细胞增多症的认识和认识的重要性。需要开展更多关于嗜酸性粒细胞增多指南的教育工作,以帮助医生做出更有利于患者的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease publishes the highest quality peer-reviewed research, reviews and scholarly comment in the drug treatment of all chronic diseases. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers involved in the medical treatment of chronic disease, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
期刊最新文献
Deep and unbiased proteomics, pathway enrichment analysis, and protein–protein interaction of biomarker signatures in migraine Ultrasound therapy for pain reduction in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on cystic fibrosis health-related quality of life and decision-making about daily treatment regimens: a mixed methods exploratory study Lack of awareness and ethnic polarity is a major cause of metabolic associated fatty liver disease in high-risk diabetes population in South London Long-term outcomes and associated factors of Crohn’s disease patients achieving transmural healing based on magnetic resonance enterography: a Chinese retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1