Common-spectrum process versus cross-correlation for gravitational-wave searches using pulsar timing arrays

J. Romano, J. Hazboun, X. Siemens, A. Archibald
{"title":"Common-spectrum process versus cross-correlation for gravitational-wave searches using pulsar timing arrays","authors":"J. Romano, J. Hazboun, X. Siemens, A. Archibald","doi":"10.1103/PHYSREVD.103.063027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) has recently reported strong statistical evidence for a common-spectrum red-noise process for all pulsars, as seen in their 12.5-yr analysis for an isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background. However, there is currently very little evidence for quadrupolar spatial correlations across the pulsars in the array, which is needed to make a confident claim of detection of a stochastic background. Here we give a frequentist analysis of a very simple signal+noise model showing that the current lack of evidence for spatial correlations is consistent with the magnitude of the correlation coefficients for pairs of Earth-pulsar baselines in the array, and the fact that pulsar timing arraysbare most-likely operating in the intermediate-signal regime. We derive analytic expressions that allow one to compare the expected values of the signal-to-noise ratios for both the common-spectrum and cross-correlation estimators.","PeriodicalId":8455,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVD.103.063027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) has recently reported strong statistical evidence for a common-spectrum red-noise process for all pulsars, as seen in their 12.5-yr analysis for an isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background. However, there is currently very little evidence for quadrupolar spatial correlations across the pulsars in the array, which is needed to make a confident claim of detection of a stochastic background. Here we give a frequentist analysis of a very simple signal+noise model showing that the current lack of evidence for spatial correlations is consistent with the magnitude of the correlation coefficients for pairs of Earth-pulsar baselines in the array, and the fact that pulsar timing arraysbare most-likely operating in the intermediate-signal regime. We derive analytic expressions that allow one to compare the expected values of the signal-to-noise ratios for both the common-spectrum and cross-correlation estimators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用脉冲星定时阵列进行引力波搜索的共谱过程与相互关联
北美纳赫兹引力波天文台(nanogrv)最近报告了强有力的统计证据,证明所有脉冲星都存在共谱红噪声过程,这是他们对各向同性随机引力波背景进行的12.5年分析所看到的。然而,目前很少有证据表明阵列中脉冲星之间存在四极空间相关性,这是对随机背景检测的自信要求。在这里,我们给出了一个非常简单的信号+噪声模型的频率分析,表明目前缺乏空间相关性的证据与阵列中地球-脉冲星基线对相关系数的大小是一致的,并且脉冲星授时阵列很可能在中间信号状态下工作。我们推导了解析表达式,允许人们比较共谱和互相关估计器的信噪比的期望值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantum optics meets black hole thermodynamics via conformal quantum mechanics: I. Master equation for acceleration radiation Balancing Static Vacuum Black Holes with Signed Masses in 4 and 5 Dimensions A new proof of Geroch's theorem on temporal splitting of globally hyperbolic spacetime Noncovariance of “covariant polymerization” in models of loop quantum gravity Strong field gravitational lensing by hairy Kerr black holes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1